A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in Class II restorations

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 274-278

  Wucher, Martin ^b   Grobler, Sias R ^a,b   Senekal, Petrus J C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE   (South Africa)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; COMPOMER; DYRACT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME AND BOND 2.1; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICATE; TPH SPECTRUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ACETONE; ADULT; BICUSPID; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICATES;

EID: 0037844939     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Koran P, Kurschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998;10:17-22.
2. Franchi M, Breschi L. Effects of acid-etching solutions on human enamel and dentin. Quint Int 1995;26:431-435.
3. Ianzano JA, Gwinnett AJ. Clincial evaluation of Class V restorations using a total etch technique: 1-year results. Am J Dent 1993;6:207-210.
4. Jordan RE, Suzuki M. Early clinical evaluation of four new bonding resins used for conservative restoration of cervical erosion lesions. J Dent Assoc 1993;59:81-84.
5. Rasmusson C-G, Köhler B, Odman P. A three-year clinical evaluation of two different composite resins. Acta Odont Scand 1998;56:70-75.
6. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, et al. clinical evaluation of posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent 1999;27:13-19.
7. Ruse ND. What is a compomer? J Can Dent Assoc 1999;65:500-504.
8. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quint Int 1996;27:203-209.
9. Mjor IA. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: A preliminary report. Quint Int 1996;27:171-174.
10. Van Dijken JWV. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. Am J Dent 1996;9:195-198.
11. Köhler B, Rasmusson CG, Odman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 2000;28:111-116.
12. Peters TCRB, Roeters JM, Frankenmolen FWA. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 1-year results. Am J Dent 1996;9:83-87.
13. Trushkowsky RD, Gwinnett AJ. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1996;9:96-99.
14. Lidums A, Wilkie R, Smales R. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: A 2-year clinical study. Am J Dent 1993;6:185-188.
15. Welbury RR, Murray JJ. A clinical trial of the Glass-ionomer cement - composite resin "sandwich" technique in Class II cavities in permanent premolar and molar teeth. Quint Int 1990;21:507-512.
16. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-358.
17. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. USPHS 1971; Publication No 790-244, San Francisco USGPO.
18. Cunha RF. A thirty months clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2000;24:113-115.
19. Marks LAM, Weerheijm KL, Amerongen WE, et al. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation. Caries Res 1999;33:387-392.
20. Roeters JM, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk CW. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1998;11:143-148.
21. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1997;25:229-232.
22. Roberts MW, Folio J, Moffa JP, et al. Clinical evaluation of a composite resin system with a dentin bonding agent for restoration of permanent posterior teeth: A 3-year study. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:301-306.
23. Mair LH. Wear patterns in two amalgams and three posterior composites after 5 years clinical service. J Dent 1995;23:107-112.
24. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 1992;8:310-319.
25. Williams PT, Johnson LN. Composite resin restoratives revisited. J Can Dent Res 1993;59:538-543.
26. Burke FJT, MacCaughey AD. The four generations of dentin bonding. Am Dent J 1995;8:88-92.
27. Duke ES. Adhesion and its application with restorative materials. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37;329-340.
28. Heymann HO, Bayne SC. Current concepts in dentin bonding; focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124;26-36.
29. Pashley DH, Pashley EL. Dentin permeability and restorative dentistry. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1991;4:5-9.
30. Pashley DH. Clinical correlations of dentin structure and function. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:777-781.
31. Pashley DH. Dentin bonding: overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:46-50.
32. Pashley DH. Dentin bonding agents. Curr Opin Dent 1992;2:46-51.
33. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: A brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quint Int 1995;26:95-110.
34. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quint Int 1997;28:135-144.
35. Applequist EA, Meiers JC. Effect of bulk insertion, prepolymerized resin composite balls, and beta-quartz inserts on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Quint Int 1996;27:253-258.
36. Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA, Curtis JW. Clinical guidelines for photocuring restorative resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:1280-1286.
37. Burgess JO, Barghi N, Chan DCN, et al. A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials. Am J Dent 1993;6:137-141.
38. Lewis BA, Burgess JO, Gray SE. Mechanical properties of dental base materials. Am J Dent 1992;5:69-72.
39. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quint Int 1996;27:203-209.
40. Christensen GJ. Glass ionomer-resin: A maturing concept. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:248-249.
41. Flessa HP, Bauer C, Al-Kathar N, et al. Wear resistance and gap formation in Class I cavities using silico-phosphate-cements and glass ionomer-cements. J Dent Res 1995;74:538 (Abstr. 1099).
42. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Federlin M, et al. Marginal adaptation of composite fillings vs. hybrid-ionomer/composite sandwich fillings. J Dent Res 1995;74:490 (Abstr. 716).
43. Koprulu H, Gurgan S, Onen A. Marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material: An investigation of placement techniques. Quint Int 1995;26:729-732.
44. Brunette DM. Critical thinking / understanding and evaluating. Dental Research. Quintessence Publishing, Quintessence Book 1997.
45. Habib CM, Kugel G, et al. Clinical evaluation of TPH/Variglass VLC for restoration of Class II carious lesions of premolars and permanent molars. Dentsply Departmental Correspondence. March 1995.