A long-term evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of resin-based composite restorations Results of a seven-year study

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 140, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1476-1484

  Gordan, Valeria V ^a,b,c   Garvan, Cynthia W ^a,b,c   Blaser, Paul K ^a,b,c   Mondragon, Eduardo ^a,b,c   Mjör, Ivar A ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical protocols; Dental restoration; Dental restoration failure; Dental restoration wear; Dental sealants; Operative; Randomized controlled clinical trials; Resin based composites; Restorative dentistry

Indexed keywords

EID: 75249088309     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0098     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Rashid RG. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91(4):363-367.
2. Haj-Ali R, Walker MP, Williams K. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems. Gen Dent 2005;53(5):369-375.
3. Magne P. Composite resins and bonded porcelain: the postamalgam era? J Calif Dent Assoc 2006;34(2):135-147.
4. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater 2007;23(1):2-8.
5. Deligeorgi V, Mjör IA, Wilson NH. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations. Prim Dent Care 2001;8(1):5-11.
6. 6. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Longterm evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 2003;31(6):395-405. (Pubitemid 36870889)
7. Tyas MJ. Placement and replacement of restorations by selected practitioners. Aust Dent J 2005;50(2):81-89.
8. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. JADA 2007;138(6):775-783.
9. Forss H, Widstrom E. Reasons for restorative therapyÍ and the longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontol Scan 2004;62(2):82-86.
10. Lucarotti PS, Holder RL, Burke FJ. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (part 1): variation by type of restoration and re-intervention. J Dent 2005;33(10):805-815.
11. Gordan VV. In vitro evaluation of margins of replaced resin based composite restorations. J Esthet Dent 2000;12(4):217-223.
12. Gordan VV. Clinical evaluation of replacement of Class V resin based composite restorations. J Dent 2001;29(7): 485-488.
13. Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Shen C. Replacement of resin-based composite: evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching. Quintessence Int 2002;33(4):273-278.
14. Brantley CF, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Nesbit SP. Does the cycle of rerestoration lead to larger restorations? JADA 1995;126(10): 1407-1413.
15. Dennison JB, Hamilton JC. Treatment decisions and conservation of tooth structure. Dent Clin North Am 2005;49(4):825-845.
16. Ettinger RL. Restoring the ageing dentition: repair or replacement? Int Dent J 1990;40(5):275-282.
17. Gordan VV, Shen C, Riley J 3rd, Mjör IA. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006;18(3):144-154.
18. Moncada G, Martin J, Fernández E, Hempel MC, Mjör I, Gordan VV. Sealing, repair and refurbishment of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial. JADA 2009;140(4):425-432.
19. Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27(5):528-534.
20. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. San Francisco: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bureau of Health Manpower Education, Division of Dental Health, Dental Health Center; 1971. U.S. Public Health Service publication 790-1244
21. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW Jr. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Oper Dent 1994;19(1):26-32.
22. Bissada NF. Symptomatology and clinical features of hypersensi-tive teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1994;39(suppl):31S-32S.
23. Hirata K, Nakashima M, Sekine I, Mukouyama Y, Kimura K. Dentinal fluid movement associated with loading of restorations. J Dent Res 1991;70(6):975-978.
24. Mount GJ, Ngo H. Minimal intervention: a new concept for operative dentistry. Quintessence Int 2000;31(8):527-533.
25. 25. Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. Repair bond strength of restorative resin composite applied to fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Acta Odontol Scand 2004;62(1):51-60. (Pubitemid 38391464)
26. Gordan VV, Shen C, Mjor IA. Marginal gap repair with flowable resin-based composites. Gen Dent 2004;52(5):390-394.
27. 27. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J Jr, Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent 2005;7(1):41-49. (Pubitemid 40521773)
28. Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Blum IR, Wilson N. Teaching students the repair of resin-based composite restorations: a survey of North American dental schools. JADA 2003;134(3):317-323.
29. Donly KJ. Sealants: where we have been; where we are going. Gen Dent 2002;50(5):438-440.
30. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW Jr, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair SM. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: resulte at year 10. JADA 1998;129(1):55-66.
31. Straffon LH, Dennison JB. Clinical evaluation comparing sealant and amalgam after 7 years: final report. JADA 1988;117(6):751-755.
32. Rodriguez-Ferrer HJ, Strahan JD, Newman HN. Effect of gingival health of removing overhanging margins of interproximal subgingival amalgam restorations. J Clin Periodontal 1980;7(6):457-462.
33. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13(4):258-269.
34. Morgan M. Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2004;16(3):211-217.
35. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98-FDI World Dental Federation study design (part I) and criteria for evaluation (part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns (published correction appears in J Adhes Dent 2007;9[6]:546).
36. J Adhes Dent 2007;9(suppl):121-147.
37. 36. Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Vazquez O, Watson RE, Wilson N. Selfetching primer and resin-based restorative material: two-year clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14(5):296-302. (Pubitemid 43020841)
38. Ernst CP, Martin M, Stuff S, Willershausen B. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5(3):148-155.
39. Turkun LS, Turkun M, Ozata F. Two-year clinical evaluation of a packable resin-based composite. JADA 2003;134(9):1205-1212.
40. Lygidakis NA, Chaliasou A, Siounas G. Evaluation of composite restorations in hypomineralised permanent molars: a four year clinical study. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2003;4(3):143-148.