Two-year evaluation of restorations of a packable composite placed in UK general dental practices

British Dental Journal

Volumn 199, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 293-296

  Burke, F J T ^a   Crisp, R J ^a   Balkenhol, M ^b   Bell, T J ^c   Lamb, J J ^c   McDermott, K ^c   Siddons, C ^c   Weller, B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b Hereaus Kulzer   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944496200     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812654     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Reinhardt J W, Capilouto M L. Composite resin esthetic dentistry survey in New England. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120: 541-544.
2. Burke F J T. Patient acceptance of posterior composite restorations. Dent Update 1989; 16: 114-120.
3. Brown L J, Wall T, Wassenaar J D. Trends in resin and amalgam usage as recorded on insurance claims submitted by dentists from the early 1990s and 1998. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 461; Abstract 2542.
4. Burke F J T, Wilson N H F, Cheung S-W, Mjor I A. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent 2001; 29: 317-324.
5. Manhart J, Kunzelmann K-H, Chen H Y, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 33-40.
6. Klein F, Keller A K, Staehle H J, Dorfer C E. Proximal contct formation with different restorative materials and techniques. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 232-235.
7. Opdam N J M, Roeters F J M, Joosten M, vd Veeke O. Class I composite restorations placed with a packing or injection technique. Dent Res 2000; 79: 149; Abstract 42.
8. Mandel I D. Clinical research - the silent partner in dental practice. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 453-463.
9. Burke F J T, Crisp R J, McCord J F. Research in dental practice: A SWOT analysis. Dent Update 2002; 29: 80-87.
10. Burke F J T, Wilson N H F. Introducing the PREP panel. Dent Pract 1994; 32: 30.
11. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980; 30: 347-357
12. Crisp R J, Burke F J T, Balkenhol M. Solitaire II restorations placed in general practice: one-year preliminary evaluation. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 201: Abstract 1323.
13. Burke F J T Shortall A C C. Successful restorations of load-bearing cavities in posterior teeth with direct-placement resin-based composite. Dent Update 2001: 28: 388-398.
14. Mair L H. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quint Int. 1998: 29: 483-490.
15. El-Mowafy O M, Lewis D W, Benmergui C, Levinton C. Meta-analysis on long-term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. J Dent 1994: 22: 33-43.
16. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs: ADA Council on Dental Benefit programs. Statement on posterior resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 1627-1628.
17. Perry R, Kugel G, Leinfelder K. One-year clinical evaluation of Surefil packable composite. Contin Compend Dental Educ 1999; 20: 544-553.
18. Wilson M A, Cowan A J, Randall R C, Crisp R J, Wilson N H F. A pratice-based randomized controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative : one-year results. Oper Dent. 2002: 27: 423-429.