Erratum: Diminishing returns and tradeoffs constrain the laboratory optimization of an enzyme (Nature Communications (2012) 3 (1257) doi: 10.1038/ncomms2246);Diminishing returns and tradeoffs constrain the laboratory optimization of an enzyme

Nature Communications

Volumn 3, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Tokuriki, Nobuhiko ^a,b,c   Jackson, Colin J ^d,e   Afriat Jurnou, Livnat ^c   Wyganowski, Kirsten T ^a   Tang, Renmei ^a   Tawfik, Dan S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^d AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e INSTITUT DE BIOLOGIE STRUCTURALE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARYLESTERASE; ENZYME VARIANT; PHOSPHOTRIESTERASE;

ASYMMETRY; CATALYSIS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; LABORATORY METHOD; MUTATION; OPTIMIZATION; PROTEIN; TRADE-OFF;

ARTICLE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME KINETICS; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ENZYME STRUCTURE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION;

EID: 84871755504     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3678     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. Stebbins, J. The law of diminishing returns. Science 99, 267-271 (1944).
2. Hartl, D. L., Dykhuizen, D. E. & Dean, A. M. Limits of adaptation: the evolution of selective neutrality. Genetics 111, 655-674 (1985). (Pubitemid 16183474)
3. Kondrashov, F. A. In search of the limits of evolution. Nat. Genet. 37, 9-10 (2005).
4. Roff, D. A. & Fairbairn, D. J. The evolution of trade-offs: where are we? J. Evol. Biol. 20, 433-447 (2007).
5. Chou, H. H., Chiu, H. C., Delaney, N. F., Segre, D. & Marx, C. J. Diminishing returns epistasis among beneficial mutations decelerates adaptation. Science 332, 1190-1192 (2011).
6. Khan, A. I., Dinh, D. M., Schneider, D., Lenski, R. E. & Cooper, T. F. Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial population. Science 332, 1193-1196 (2011).
7. Miralles, R., Moya, A. & Elena, S. F. Diminishing returns of population size in the rate of RNA virus adaptation. J. Virol. 74, 3566-3571 (2000). (Pubitemid 30180299)
8. Arjan, J. A. et al. Diminishing returns from mutation supply rate in asexual populations. Science 283, 404-406 (1999).
9. MacLean, R. C., Perron, G. G. & Gardner, A. Diminishing returns from beneficial mutations and pervasive epistasis shape the fitness landscape for rifampicin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Genetics 186, 1345-1354 (2010).
10. Aharoni, A. et al. The 'evolvability' of promiscuous protein functions. Nat. Genet. 37, 73-76 (2005). (Pubitemid 40070942)
11. Khersonsky, O. & Tawfik, D. S. Enzyme promiscuity: a mechanistic and evolutionary perspective. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 79, 471-505 (2010).
12. Poelwijk, F. J., de Vos, M. G. & Tans, S. J. Tradeoffs and optimality in the evolution of gene regulation. Cell 146, 462-470 (2011).
13. Peisajovich, S. G. & Tawfik, D. S. Protein engineers turned evolutionists. Nat. Methods 4, 991-994 (2007). (Pubitemid 350201764)
14. Bloom, J. D. & Arnold, F. H. In the light of directed evolution: pathways of adaptive protein evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9995-10000 (2009).
15. Tracewell, C. A. & Arnold, F. H. Directed enzyme evolution: climbing fitness peaks one amino acid at a time. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13, 3-9 (2009).
16. O'Brien, P. & Herschlag, D. Catalytic promiscuity and the evolution of new enzymatic activities. Chem. Biol. 6, 91-105 (1999).
17. Babtie, A., Tokuriki, N. & Hollfelder, F. What makes an enzyme promiscuous? Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 14, 200-207 (2010).
18. Romero, P. A. & Arnold, F. H. Exploring protein fitness landscapes by directed evolution. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 866-876 (2009).
19. Toscano, M. D., Woycechowsky, K. J. & Hilvert, D. Minimalist active-site redesign: teaching old enzymes new tricks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 46, 3212-3236 (2007). (Pubitemid 46973466)
20. Fasan, R., Meharenna, Y. T., Snow, C. D., Poulos, T. L. & Arnold, F. H. Evolutionary history of a specialized p450 propane monooxygenase. J. Mol. Biol. 383, 1069-1080 (2008).
21. Dalby, P. A. Strategy and success for the directed evolution of enzymes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 4, 473-480 (2011).
22. Caldwell, S. R., Newcomb, J. R., Schlecht, K. A. & Raushel, F. M. Limits of diffusion in the hydrolysis of substrates by the phosphotriesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta. Biochemistry 30, 7438-7444 (1991).
23. Jackson, C. J. et al. In crystallo capture of a Michaelis complex and productbinding modes of a bacterial phosphotriesterase. J. Mol. Biol. 375, 1189-1196 (2008).
24. Roodveldt, C. & Tawfik, D. S. Directed evolution of phosphotriesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta for heterologous expression in Escherichia coli results in stabilization of the metal-free state. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 18, 51-58 (2005). (Pubitemid 40516991)
25. Roodveldt, C. & Tawfik, D. S. Shared promiscuous activities and evolutionary features in various members of the amidohydrolase superfamily. Biochemistry 44, 12728-12736 (2005). (Pubitemid 41377312)
26. Tokuriki, N. & Tawfik, D. S. Chaperonin overexpression promotes genetic variation and enzyme evolution. Nature 459, 668-673 (2009).
27. Vanhooke, J. L., Benning, M. M., Raushel, F. M. & Holden, H. M. Threedimensional structure of the zinc-containing phosphotriesterase with the bound substrate analog diethyl 4-methylbenzylphosphonate. Biochemistry 35, 6020-6025 (1996). (Pubitemid 26147573)
28. Jackson, C. J. et al. Conformational sampling, catalysis, and evolution of the bacterial phosphotriesterase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21631-21636 (2009).
29. Tokuriki, N., Stricher, F., Serrano, L. & Tawfik, D. S. How protein stability and new functions trade off. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000002 (2008).
30. Tokuriki, N. & Tawfik, D. S. Stability effects of mutations and protein evolvability. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19, 596-604 (2009).
31. Tokuriki, N. & Tawfik, D. S. Protein dynamism and evolvability. Science 324, 203-207 (2009).
32. Omburo, G. A., Kuo, J. M., Mullins, L. S. & Raushel, F. M. Characterization of the zinc binding site of bacterial phosphotriesterase. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13278-13283 (1992).
33. Aubert, S. D., Li, Y. & Raushel, F. M. Mechanism for the hydrolysis of organophosphates by the bacterial phosphotriesterase. Biochemistry 43, 5707-5715 (2004). (Pubitemid 38623605)
34. Shim, H. & Raushel, F. M. Self-assembly of the binuclear metal center of phosphotriesterase. Biochemistry 39, 7357-7364 (2000). (Pubitemid 30422051)
35. Jackson, C. J. et al. Anomalous scattering analysis of Agrobacterium radiobacter phosphotriesterase: the prominent role of iron in the heterobinuclear active site. Biochem. J. 397, 501-508 (2006). (Pubitemid 44187508)
36. Benning, M. M., Hong, S. B., Raushel, F. M. & Holden, H. M. The binding of substrate analogs to phosphotriesterase. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30556-30560 (2000).
37. Arnold, F., Wintrode, P., Miyazaki, K. & Gershenson, A. How enzymes adapt: lessons from directed evolution. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 100-106 (2001). (Pubitemid 32144744)
38. Morley, K. L. & Kazlauskas, R. J. Improving enzyme properties: when are closer mutations better? Trends Biotechnol. 23, 231-237 (2005). (Pubitemid 40615535)
39. Wang, L., Tharp, S., Selzer, T., Benkovic, S. J. & Kohen, A. Effects of a distal mutation on active site chemistry. Biochemistry 45, 1383-1392 (2006). (Pubitemid 43214803)
40. Nagatani, R. A., Gonzalez, A., Shoichet, B. K., Brinen, L. S. & Babbitt, P. C. Stability for function trade-offs in the enolase superfamily "catalytic module". Biochemistry 46, 6688-6695 (2007). (Pubitemid 46906400)
41. Khersonsky, O. et al. Optimization of the in-silico-designed kemp eliminase KE70 by computational design and directed evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 407, 391-412 (2011).
42. Kimura, M. The neutral theory of molecular evolution and the world view of the neutralists. Genome 31, 24-31 (1989). (Pubitemid 19189346)
43. Hughes, A. L. Near neutrality: leading edge of the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1133, 162-179 (2008). (Pubitemid 351841332)
44. Bar-Even, A. et al. The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters. Biochemistry 50, 4402-4410 (2011).
45. Weng, J. K., Philippe, R. N. & Noel, J. P. The rise of chemodiversity in plants. Science 336, 1667-1670 (2012).
46. O'Maille, P. et al. Quantitative exploration of the catalytic landscape separating divergent plant sesquiterpene synthases. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 617-623 (2008).
47. Keeling, C. I., Weisshaar, S., Lin, R. P. & Bohlmann, J. Functional plasticity of paralogous diterpene synthases involved in conifer defense. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1085-1090 (2008).
48. Wang, Q. et al. Characterization of CYP76M5-8 indicates metabolic plasticity within a plant biosynthetic gene cluster. J. Biol. Chem. 9, 6159-6168 (2012).
49. Nam, H. et al. Network context and selection in the evolution to enzyme specificity. Science 337, 1101-1104 (2012).
50. Bar-Even, A. & Tawfik, D. S. Engineering specialized metabolic pathways - is there a room for enzyme improvements? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. (2012, in press).
51. Tawfik, D. S., Zemel, R. R., Arad-Yellin, R., Green, B. S. & Eshhar, Z. Simple method for selecting catalytic monoclonal antibodies that exhibit turnover and specificity. Biochemistry 29, 9916-9921 (1990). (Pubitemid 20348527)
52. Kabsch, W. Xds Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125-132 (2010).
53. Evans, P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 72-82 (2006).
54. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 (2004). (Pubitemid 41742764)
55. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213-221 (2010).
56. Grimsley, J. K., Calamini, B., Wild, J. R. & Mesecar, A. D. Structural and mutational studies of organophosphorus hydrolase reveal a cryptic and functional allosteric-binding site. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 442, 169-179 (2005). (Pubitemid 41463707)