A Measure of the Broad Substrate Specificity of Enzymes Based on 'Duplicate' Catalytic Residues

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Chakraborty, Sandeep ^a   Ásgeirsson, Bjarni ^b   Rao, Basuthkar J ^a  

^a TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYL HYDROLASE; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ASPARAGINE; ENZYME; GLUTAMIC ACID; GLYCINE; METHYLTRANSFERASE; PALMITOYL PROTEIN THIOESTERASE; PALMITOYL PROTEIN THIOESTERASE 1; RNA METHYLTRANSFERASE; THROMBOCYTE ACTIVATING FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; MONOCYTE; MUTAGENESIS; PALMITOYLATION; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; THROMBOCYTE ACTIVATION;

CATALYSIS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; CYTOCHROME P-450 CYP3A; ENZYMES; HYDROLASES; METHYLTRANSFERASES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; STATIC ELECTRICITY; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84869211870     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049313     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Nelson DL, Cox MM (2008) Lehninger's Principles of Biochemistry. W. H. Freeman, fifth edition.
2. Koshland DE, (1958) Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 44: 98-104.
3. Bone R, Silen JL, Agard DA, (1989) Structural plasticity broadens the specificity of an engineered protease. Nature 339: 191-195.
4. Huse M, Kuriyan J, (2002) The conformational plasticity of protein kinases. Cell 109: 275-282.
5. Das C, Hoang QQ, Kreinbring CA, Luchansky SJ, Meray RK, et al. (2006) Structural basis for conformational plasticity of the Parkinson's disease-associated ubiquitin hydrolase UCH-L1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 4675-4680.
6. Ibuka AS, Ishii Y, Galleni M, Ishiguro M, Yamaguchi K, et al. (2003) Crystal structure of extended-spectrum β-lactamase Toho-1: insights into the molecular mechanism for catalytic reaction and substrate specificity expansion. Biochemistry 42: 10634-10643.
7. Sauvage E, Fonze E, Quinting B, Galleni M, Frere JM, et al. (2006) Crystal structure of the Mycobac-terium fortuitum class A β-lactamase: structural basis for broad substrate specificity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50: 2516-2521.
8. Aller SG, Yu J, Ward A, Weng Y, Chittaboina S, et al. (2009) Structure of P-glycoprotein reveals a molecular basis for poly-specific drug binding. Science 323: 1718-1722.
9. Nukaga M, Haruta S, Tanimoto K, Kogure K, Taniguchi K, et al. (1995) Molecular evolution of a class C β-lactamase extending its substrate specificity. J Biol Chem 270: 5729-5735.
10. Samuelson JC, Xu SY, (2002) Directed evolution of restriction endonuclease BstYI to achieve increased substrate specificity. J Mol Biol 319: 673-683.
11. Berger I, Guttman C, Amar D, Zarivach R, Aharoni A, (2011) The molecular basis for the broad substrate specificity of human sulfotransferase 1A1. PLoS ONE 6: e26794.
12. Kaup BA, Piantini U, Wust M, Schrader J, (2007) Monoterpenes as novel substrates for oxidation and halo-hydroxylation with chloroperoxidase from Caldariomyces fumago. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73: 1087-1096.
13. Doucet N, De Wals PY, Pelletier JN, (2004) Site-saturation mutagenesis of Tyr-105 reveals its im-portance in substrate stabilization and discrimination in TEM-1 beta-lactamase. J Biol Chem 279: 46295-46303.
14. Nath A, Atkins WM, (2008) A quantitative index of substrate promiscuity. Biochemistry 47: 157-166.
15. Jensen RA, (1976) Enzyme recruitment in evolution of new function. Annu Rev Microbiol 30: 409-425.
16. Jacob F, (1977) Evolution and tinkering. Science 196: 1161-1166.
17. Copley SD, (2003) Enzymes with extra talents: moonlighting functions and catalytic promiscuity. Curr Opin Chem Biol 7: 265-272.
18. Khersonsky O, Tawfik DS, (2010) Enzyme promiscuity: a mechanistic and evolutionary perspective. Annu Rev Biochem 79: 471-505.
19. Chakraborty S, Minda R, Salaye L, Bhattacharjee SK, Rao BJ, (2011) Active site detection by spatial conformity and electrostatic analysis- unravelling a proteolytic function in shrimp alkaline phosphatase. PLoS ONE 6: e28470.
20. Chakraborty S, Rao BJ, (2012) A measure of the promiscuity of proteins and characteristics of residues in the vicinity of the catalytic site that regulate promiscuity. PLoS ONE 7: e32011.
21. Honig B, Nicholls A, (1995) Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science 268: 1144-1149.
22. Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA, (2001) Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 10037-10041.
23. Jeffery CJ, (2009) Moonlighting proteins-an update. Mol Biosyst 5: 345-350.
24. Porter CT, Bartlett GJ, Thornton JM, (2004) The Catalytic Site Atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D129-133.
25. Poehlsgaard J, Douthwaite S, (2005) The bacterial ribosome as a target for antibiotics. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 870-881.
26. Weisblum B, (1995) Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39: 577-585.
27. Martin JL, McMillan FM, (2002) SAM (dependent) I AM: the S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase fold. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12: 783-793.
28. Schluckebier G, Zhong P, Stewart KD, Kavanaugh TJ, Abad-Zapatero C, (1999) The 2.2 Å structure of the rRNA methyltransferase ErmC' and its complexes with cofactor and cofactor analogs: implications for the reaction mechanism. J Mol Biol 289: 277-291.
29. Vester B, Nielsen AK, Hansen LH, Douthwaite S, (1998) ErmE methyltransferase recognition elements in RNA substrates. J Mol Biol 282: 255-264.
30. Tsutsumi R, Fukata Y, Fukata M, (2008) Discovery of protein-palmitoylating enzymes. Pflügers Arch 456: 1199-1206.
31. Adams MN, Christensen ME, He Y, Waterhouse NJ, Hooper JD, (2011) The role of palmitoylation in signalling, cellular trafficking and plasma membrane localization of protease-activated receptor-2. PLoS ONE 6: e28018.
32. Linder ME, Deschenes RJ, (2003) New insights into the mechanisms of protein palmitoylation. Bio-chemistry 42: 4311-4320.
33. Bellizzi JJ, Widom J, Kemp C, Lu JY, Das AK, et al. (2000) The crystal structure of palmitoyl protein thioesterase 1 and the molecular basis of infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 4573-4578.
34. Calero G, Gupta P, Nonato MC, Tandel S, Biehl ER, et al. (2003) The crystal structure of palmitoyl protein thioesterase-2 (PPT2) reveals the basis for divergent substrate specificities of the two lysosomal thioesterases, PPT1 and PPT2. J Biol Chem 278: 37957-37964.
35. Chao W, Olson MS, (1993) Platelet-activating factor: receptors and signal transduction. Biochem J 292 (Pt 3): 617-629.
36. Drolet AM, Thivierge M, Turcotte S, Hanna D, Maynard B, et al. (2011) Platelet-activating factor induces Th17 cell differentiation. Mediators Inflamm 2011: 913802.
37. Fragel-Madeira L, Meletti T, Mariante RM, Monteiro RQ, Einicker-Lamas M, et al. (2011) Platelet activating factor blocks interkinetic nuclear migration in retinal progenitors through an arrest of the cell cycle at the S/G2 transition. PLoS ONE 6: e16058.
38. McIntyre TM, Prescott SM, Stafforini DM, (2009) The emerging roles of PAF acetylhydrolase. J Lipid Res 50Suppl: S255-259.
39. Ho YS, Sheffield PJ, Masuyama J, Arai H, Li J, et al. (1999) Probing the substrate specificity of the intracellular brain platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase. Protein Eng 12: 693-700.
40. Vallee BL, Auld DS, (1993) Zinc: biological functions and coordination motifs. Acc. Chem. Res 26: 543-551.
41. Helland R, Larsen RL, Asgeirsson B, (2009) The 1.4 Å crystal structure of the large and cold-active Vibrio sp. alkaline phosphatase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1794: 297-308.
42. Park C, Raines RT, (2003) Catalysis by ribonuclease A is limited by the rate of substrate association. Biochemistry 42: 3509-3518.
43. van Loo B, Jonas S, Babtie AC, Benjdia A, Berteau O, et al. (2010) An efficient, multiply promiscuous hydrolase in the alkaline phosphatase superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 2740-2745.
44. Koshland DE, (1958) Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 44: 98-104.
45. Cirino PC, Mayer KM, Umeno D, (2003) Generating mutant libraries using error-prone PCR. Methods Mol Biol 231: 3-9.
46. Stemmer WP, (1994) Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature 370: 389-391.
47. Zhao H, Giver L, Shao Z, Affholter JA, Arnold FH, (1998) Molecular evolution by staggered extension process (StEP) in vitro recombination. Nat Biotechnol 16: 258-261.
48. Kolkman JA, Stemmer WP, (2001) Directed evolution of proteins by exon shuffling. Nat Biotechnol 19: 423-428.
49. Reetz MT, Carballeira JD, (2007) Iterative saturation mutagenesis (ISM) for rapid directed evolution of functional enzymes. Nat Protoc 2: 891-903.
50. Climie S, Ruiz-Perez L, Gonzalez-Pacanowska D, Prapunwattana P, Cho SW, et al. (1990) Saturation site-directed mutagenesis of thymidylate synthase. J Biol Chem 265: 18776-18779.
51. Reetz MT, Carballeira JD, Peyralans J, Hobenreich H, Maichele A, et al. (2006) Expanding the substrate scope of enzymes: combining mutations obtained by CASTing. Chemistry 12: 6031-6038.
52. Zanghellini A, Jiang L, Wollacott AM, Cheng G, Meiler J, et al. (2006) New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci 15: 2785-2794.
53. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL, (1997) De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 278: 82-87.
54. Malisi C, Kohlbacher O, Hocker B, (2009) Automated scaffold selection for enzyme design. Proteins 77: 74-83.
55. Georgiev I, Lilien RH, Donald BR, (2008) The minimized dead-end elimination criterion and its application to protein redesign in a hybrid scoring and search algorithm for computing partition functions over molecular ensembles. J Comput Chem 29: 1527-1542.
56. Lovell SC, Word JM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC, (2000) The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins 40: 389-408.
57. Chakraborty S, (2012) An automated flow for directed evolution based on detection of promiscuous scaffolds using spatial and electrostatic properties of catalytic residues. PLoS ONE 7: e40408.
58. Bolon DN, Mayo SL, (2001) Enzyme-like proteins by computational design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 14274-14279.
59. Jiang L, Altho EA, Clemente FR, Doyle L, Rothlisberger D, et al. (2008) De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 319: 1387-1391.
60. Faiella M, Andreozzi C, de Rosales RT, Pavone V, Maglio O, et al. (2009) An artificial di-iron oxo-protein with phenol oxidase activity. Nat Chem Biol 5: 882-884.
61. Siegel JB, Zanghellini A, Lovick HM, Kiss G, Lambert AR, et al. (2010) Computational design of an enzyme catalyst for a stereoselective bimolecular Diels-Alder reaction. Science 329: 309-313.
62. Rothlisberger D, Khersonsky O, Wollacott AM, Jiang L, DeChancie J, et al. (2008) Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 453: 190-195.
63. Park H, Lee S, Suh J, (2005) Structural and dynamical basis of broad substrate specificity, catalytic mechanism, and inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4. J Am Chem Soc 127: 13634-13642.
64. Wu R, Xie H, Mo Y, Cao Z, (2009) Broad substrate specificity and catalytic mechanism of Pseudomonas stutzeri L-rhamnose isomerase: insights from QM/MM molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem A 113: 11595-11603.
65. Ghuysen JM, (1991) Serine beta-lactamases and penicillin-binding proteins. Annu Rev Microbiol 45: 37-67.
66. Matagne A, Dubus A, Galleni M, Frere JM, (1999) The beta-lactamase cycle: a tale of selective pressure and bacterial ingenuity. Nat Prod Rep 16: 1-19.
67. Lim D, Strynadka NC, (2002) Structural basis for the beta lactam resistance of PBP2a from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Struct Biol 9: 870-876.
68. Koutsioulis D, Lyskowski A, Maki S, Guthrie E, Feller G, et al. (2010) Coordination sphere of the third metal site is essential to the activity and metal selectivity of alkaline phosphatases. Protein Sci 75-84.
69. Dolinsky TJ, Nielsen JE, McCammon JA, Baker NA, (2004) PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res 32: W665-667.
70. Stajich JE, Block D, Boulez K, Brenner SE, Chervitz SA, et al. (2002) The bioperl toolkit: Perl modules for the life sciences. Genome Res. 12: 1611-1618.
71. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A, (2000) EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet 16: 276-277.
72. Gherardini PF, Wass MN, Helmer-Citterich M, Sternberg MJ, (2007) Convergent evolution of enzyme active sites is not a rare phenomenon. J Mol Biol 372: 817-845.
73. Kleywegt GJ, (1999) Recognition of spatial motifs in protein structures. J Mol Biol 285: 1887-1897.
74. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402.