When a domain is not a domain, and why it is important to properly filter proteins in databases: Conflicting definitions and fold classification systems for structural domains make filtering of such databases imperative

BioEssays

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1060-1069

  Towse, Clare Louise ^a   Daggett, Valerie ^a  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational biology; Dynameome; Intrinsic disorder; Protein structure

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; FILTRATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN TARGETING; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 84869123655     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201200116     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, et al. 2007. CDD: a conserved domain database for interactive domain family analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D237-40.
2. Kendrew J, Bodo G, Dintzis H, Parrish R, et al. 1958. A three-dimensional model of the myoglobin molecule obtained by X-ray analysis. Nature 181: 662-6.
3. Perutz MF, Rossmann MG, Cullis AF, Muirhead H, et al. 1960. Structure of haemoglobin: a three-dimensional Fourier synthesis at 5.5-Å resolution, obtained by X-ray analysis. Nature 185: 416-22.
4. Levitt M, Chothia C. 1976. Structural patterns in globular proteins. Nature 261: 552-8.
5. Grant A, Lee D, Orengo C. 2004. Progress towards mapping the universe of protein folds. Genome Biol 5: 107.
6. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, et al. 2000. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235-42.
7. Taylor WR, Chelliah V, Hollup SM, MacDonald JT, et al. 2009. Probing the "dark matter" of protein fold space. Structure 17: 1244-52.
8. Skolnick J, Zhou H, Brylinski M. 2012. Further evidence for the likely completeness of the library of solved single domain protein structures. J Phys Chem B 116: 6654-64.
9. Kihara D, Skolnick J. 2003. The PDB is a covering set of small protein structures. J Mol Biol 334: 793-802.
10. Skolnick J, Arakaki AK, Lee SY, Brylinski M. 2009. The continuity of protein structure space is an intrinsic property of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 15690-5.
11. Schaeffer RD, Daggett V. 2011. Protein folds and protein folding. Protein Eng Des Sel 24: 11-9.
12. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. 1995. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247: 536-40.
13. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, et al. 1997. CATH - a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5: 1093-109.
14. Dietmann S. 2001. A fully automatic evolutionary classification of protein folds: Dali Domain Dictionary version 3. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 55-7.
15. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJP, et al. 2004. SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D226-9.
16. Van Der Kamp MW, Schaeffer RD, Jonsson AL, Scouras AD, et al. 2010. Dynameomics: a comprehensive database of protein dynamics. Structure 18: 423-35.
17. Beck DAC, Jonsson AL, Schaeffer RD, Scott KA, et al. 2008. Dynameomics: mass annotation of protein dynamics and unfolding in water by high-throughput atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. Protein Eng Des Sel 21: 353-68.
18. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, et al. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409: 860-921.
19. Day R, Beck DAC, Armen RS, Daggett V. 2003. A consensus view of fold space: combining SCOP, CATH, and the Dali domain dictionary. Protein Sci 12: 2150-60.
20. Schaeffer RD, Jonsson AL, Simms AM, Daggett V. 2011. Generation of a consensus protein domain dictionary. Bioinformatics 27: 46-54.
21. Marchler-Bauer A, Lu S, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, et al. 2010. CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D225-9.
22. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Chandonia J-M, Brenner SE, et al. 2008. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D419-25.
23. Benson NC, Daggett V. 2008. Dynameomics: large-scale assessment of native protein flexibility. Protein Sci 17: 2038-50.
24. Islam SA, Luo J, Sternberg MJE. 1995. Identification and analysis of domains in proteins. Protein Eng Des Sel 8: 513-26.
25. Uversky VN. 2011. Intrinsically disordered proteins from A to Z. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 43: 1090-103.
26. Uversky VN. 2010. The mysterious unfoldome: structureless, underappreciated, yet vital part of any given proteome. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010: 568068.
27. Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, et al. 2004. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J Mol Biol 337: 635-45.
28. Fink AL. 2005. Natively unfolded proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15: 35-41.
29. Le Gall T, Romero PR, Cortese MS, Uversky VN, et al. 2007. Intrinsic disorder in the Protein Data Bank. J Biomol Struct Dyn 24: 325-42.
30. Dosztányi Z, Csizmók V, Tompa P, Simon I. 2005. The pairwise energy content estimated from amino acid composition discriminates between folded and intrinsically unstructured proteins. J Mol Biol 347: 827-39.
31. Vucetic S, Obradovic Z, Vacic V, Radivojac P, et al. 2005. DisProt: a database of protein disorder. Bioinformatics 21: 137-40.
32. Xue B, Mizianty MJ, Kurgan L, Uversky VN. 2012. Protein intrinsic disorder as a flexible armor and a weapon of HIV-1. Cell Mol Life Sci 69: 1211-59.
33. Willbold D, Hoffmann S, Rösch P. 1997. Secondary structure and tertiary fold of the human immunodeficiency virus protein U (Vpu) cytoplasmic domain in solution. Eur J Biochem 245: 581-8.
34. Morshauser RC, Hu W, Wang H, Pang Y, et al. 1999. High-resolution solution structure of the 18kDa substrate-binding domain of the mammalian chaperone protein Hsc70. J Mol Biol 289: 1387-403.
35. Berkovits HJ, Berg JM. 1999. Metal and DNA binding properties of a two-domain fragment of neural zinc finger factor 1, a CCHC-type zinc binding protein. Biochemistry 38: 16826-30.
36. Uversky VN, Gillespie JR, Fink AL. 2000. Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins 41: 415-27.
37. Matthews JM, Kowalski K, Liew CK, Sharpe BK, et al. 2001. A class of zinc fingers involved in protein-protein interactions. Eur J Biochem 267: 1030-8.
38. Falla TJ, Karunaratne DN, Hancock RE. 1996. Mode of action of the antimicrobial peptide indolicidin. J Biol Chem 271: 19298-303.
39. Maxwell KL, Yee AA, Booth V, Arrowsmith CH, et al. 2001. The solution structure of bacteriophage λ protein W, a small morphogenetic protein possessing a novel fold. J Mol Biol 308: 9-14.
40. Maxwell KL, Yee AA, Arrowsmith CH, Gold M, et al. 2002. The solution structure of the bacteriophage λ head-tail joining protein, gpFII. J Mol Biol 318: 1395-404.
41. Fukushima K, Kikuchi J, Koshiba S, Kigawa T, et al. 2002. Solution structure of the DFF-C domain of DFF45/ICAD. A structural basis for the regulation of apoptotic DNA fragmentation. J Mol Biol 321: 317-27.
42. Hunter S, Jones P, Mitchell A, Apweiler R, et al. 2012. InterPro in 2011: new developments in the family and domain prediction database. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D306-12.
43. Paliy O, Gargac SM, Cheng Y, Uversky VN, et al. 2008. Protein disorder is positively correlated with gene expression in Escherichia coli. J Proteome Res 7: 2234-45.
44. Ng KK, Petersen JF, Cherney MM, Garen C, et al. 2000. Structural basis for the inhibition of porcine pepsin by Ascaris pepsin inhibitor-3. Nat Struct Biol 7: 653-7.
45. Sickmeier M, Hamilton JA, LeGall T, Vacic V, et al. 2007. DisProt: the database of disordered Proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D786-93.
46. Orengo CA, Pearl FM, Bray JE, Todd AE, et al. 1999. The CATH database provides insights into protein structure/function relationships. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 275-9.
47. Dyson HJ, Wright PE. 2005. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 197-208.
48. Demarest SJ, Martinez-Yamout M, Chung J, Chen H, et al. 2002. Mutual synergistic folding in recruitment of CBP/p300 by p160 nuclear receptor coactivators. Nature 415: 549-53.
49. Shaiu WL, Hu T, Hsieh TS. 1999. The hydrophilic, protease-sensitive terminal domains of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerases have essential intracellular functions. Pac Symp Biocomput 4: 578-89.
50. Fass D, Bogden CE, Berger JM. 1999. Quaternary changes in topoisomerase II may direct orthogonal movement of two DNA strands. Nat Struct Biol 6: 322-6.
51. Bochtler M, Hartmann C, Song HK, Bourenkov GP, et al. 2000. The structures of HslU and the ATP-dependent protease HslU-HslV. Nature 403: 800-5.
52. Wang J, Song JJ, Franklin MC, Kamtekar S, et al. 2001. Crystal structures of the HslVU peptidase-ATPase complex reveal an ATP-dependent proteolysis mechanism. Structure 9: 177-84.
53. Chen JW, Romero P, Uversky VN, Dunker AK. 2006. Conservation of intrinsic disorder in protein domains and families: I. A database of conserved predicted disordered regions. J Proteome Res 5: 879-87.
54. Tompa P, Fuxreiter M, Oldfield CJ, Simon I, et al. 2009. Close encounters of the third kind: disordered domains and the interactions of proteins. BioEssays 31: 328-35.
55. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, et al. 2004. UCSF Chimera - A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25: 1605-12.