Generation of a consensus protein domain dictionary

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 46-54

  Schaeffer, R Dustin ^a   Jonsson, Amanda L ^b   Simms, Andrew M ^a   Daggett, Valerie ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; BOOK; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DICTIONARIES AS TOPIC; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 78650524534     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq625     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alva,V, et al. (2008) Cradle-loop barrels and the concept of metafolds in protein classification by natural descent. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 18, 358-365.
2. Andreeva,A, et al. (2008) Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D419-D425.
3. Beck,D.A, et al. (2008) Dynameomics: mass annotation of protein dynamics and unfolding in water by high-throughput atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. Protein Eng. Des. Sel., 21, 353-368.
4. Chandonia,J.M, et al. (2004) The ASTRAL Compendium in 2004. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D189-D192.
5. Coulson,A.F. and Moult,J. (2002) A unifold, mesofold, and superfold model of protein fold use. Proteins, 46, 61-71.
6. Csaba,G., et al. (2009) Systematic comparison of SCOPand CATH: a new gold standard for protein structure analysis. BMC Struct. Biol., 9, 23.
7. Cuff,A.L, et al. (2009) The CATH classification revisited-architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D310-D314.
8. Day,R, et al. (2003) A consensus view of fold space: combining SCOP, CATH, and the Dali Domain Dictionary. Protein Sci., 12, 2150-2160.
9. Dietmann,S, et al. (2001) A fully automatic evolutionary classification of protein folds: Dali Domain Dictionary version 3. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 55-57.
10. Greene,L.H, et al. (2007) The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, D291-D297.
11. Grishin,N.V. (2001) Fold change in evolution of protein structures. J. Struct. Biol., 134, 167-185.
12. Hadley,C. and Jones,D.T. (1999) A systematic comparison of protein structure classifications: SCOP, CATH and FSSP. Structure, 7, 1099-1112.
13. Holland,T.A, et al. (2006) Partitioning protein structures into domains: why is it so difficult? J. Mol. Biol., 361, 562-590.
14. Holm,L, et al. (2008) Searching protein structure databases with DaliLite v.3. Bioinformatics, 24, 2780-2781.
15. Jefferson,E.R, et al. (2008) A comparison of SCOP and CATH with respect to domain-domain interactions. Proteins, 70, 54-62.
16. Kendrew,J.C, et al. (1960) Structure of myoglobin: A three-dimensional Fourier synthesis at 2 A resolution. Nature, 185, 422-427.
17. Kolodny,R, et al. (2006) Protein structure comparison: implications for the nature of 'fold space', and structure and function prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 16, 393-398.
18. Krishna Murthy,H.M, et al. (2009) Dengue virus NS3 serine protease. Crystal structure and insights into interaction of the active site with substrates by molecular modeling and structural analysis of mutational effects. J. Biol. Chem., 284, 34468-34468.
19. Levitt,M. and Chothia,C. (1976) Structural patterns in globular proteins. Nature, 261, 552-558.
20. Majumdar,I, et al. (2009) A database of domain definitions for proteins with complex interdomain Sgeometry. PLoS One, 4, e5084.
21. Murzin,A.G, et al. (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536-540.
22. Nagano,N, et al. (2002) One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. J. Mol. Biol., 321, 741-765.
23. Orengo,C.A, et al. (1997) CATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure, 5, 1093-1108.
24. Pascual-Garcia,A, et al. (2009) Cross-over between discrete and continuous protein structure space: insights into automatic classification and networks of protein structures. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000331.
25. Perutz,M.F, et al. (1960) Structure of haemoglobin: a three-dimensional Fourier synthesis at 5.5-A. resolution, obtained by X-ray analysis. Nature, 185, 416-422.
26. Phillips,D.C. (1967) The Hen-white lysozyme molecule. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 57, 483-495.
27. Rueda,M, et al. (2007) A consensus view of protein dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 796-801.
28. Sam,V, et al. (2006) ROC and confusion analysis of structure comparison methods identify the main causes of divergence from manual protein classification, BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 206.
29. Schaeffer,R.D, et al. (2010) Protein folds and protein folding. Prot. Eng. Des. Sel., Available at http://peds.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/11/02/protein.gzq096.
30. Simms,A.M., et al. (2008) Dynameomics: design of a computational lab workflow and scientific data repository for protein simulations. Protein Eng. Des. Sel., 21, 369-377.
31. Sowdhamini,R. and Blundell,T.L. (1995) An automatic method involving cluster analysis of secondary structures for the identification of domains in proteins. Protein Sci., 4, 506-520.
32. Valas,R.E, et al. (2009) Nothing about protein structure makes sense except in the light of evolution. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 19, 329-334.
33. van der Kamp,M.W, et al. (2010) Dynameomics: a comprehensive database of protein dynamics. Structure, 18, 423-435.
34. Veretnik,S, et al. (2004) Toward consistent assignment of structural domains in proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 339, 647-678.
35. Westbrook,J, et al. (2005) PDBML: the representation of archival macromolecular structure data in XML. Bioinformatics, 21, 988-992.
36. Wetlaufer,D.B. (1973) Nucleation, rapid folding, and globular intrachain regions in proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 70, 697-701.
37. Wolf,Y.I, et al. (2000) Estimating the number of protein folds and families from complete genome data. J. Mol. Biol., 299, 897-905.