The PDB is a covering set of small protein structures

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 334, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 793-802

  Kihara, Daisuke ^a,b   Skolnick, Jeffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fragments; PDB; Protein structure comparison; Protein structure space; Relative RMSD

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; MOLECULAR SIZE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 0242720595     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.027     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucl. Acids Res. 28:2000;235-242.
2. Holm L., Sander C. Touring protein fold space with Dali/FSSP. Nucl. Acids Res. 26:1998;316-319.
3. Lo Conte L., Brenner S.E., Hubbard T.J., Chothia C., Murzin A.G. SCOP database in 2002: refinements accommodate structural genomics. Nucl. Acids Res. 30:2002;264-267.
4. Orengo C.A., Michie A.D., Jones S., Jones D.T., Swindells M.B., Thornton J.M. CATH - a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure. 5:1997;1093-1108.
5. Chothia C. Proteins. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature. 357:1992;543-544.
6. Orengo C.A., Jones D.T., Thornton J.M. Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature. 372:1994;631-634.
7. Wang Z.X. How many fold types of protein are there in nature? Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 26:1996;186-191.
8. Skolnick J., Kihara D. Defrosting the frozen approximation: PROSPECTOR - a new approach to threading. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 42:2001;319-331.
9. Bowie J.U., Luthy R., Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 253:1991;164-170.
10. Jones D.T. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 287:1999;797-815.
11. Madej T., Gibrat J.F., Bryant S.H. Threading a database of protein cores. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;356-369.
12. Sali A., Blundell T.L. Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234:1993;779-815.
13. Rost B., Sander C. Improved prediction of protein secondary structure by use of sequence profiles and neural networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 90:1993;7558-7562.
14. Jones D.T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292:1999;195-202.
15. Karplus K., Karchin R., Barrett C., Tu S., Cline M., Diekhans M., et al. What is the value added by human intervention in protein structure prediction? Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 2001;86-91.
16. Asai K., Hayamizu S., Handa K. Prediction of protein secondary structure by the hidden Markov model. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 9:1993;141-146.
17. Lu H., Skolnick J. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 44:2001;223-232.
18. DeBolt S.E., Skolnick J. Evaluation of atomic level mean force potentials via inverse folding and inverse refinement of protein structures: atomic burial position and pairwise non-bonded interactions. Protein Eng. 9:1996;637-655.
19. Bonneau R., Strauss C., Rohl C., Chivian D., Bradley P., Malmstrom L., et al. De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 322:2002;65.
20. Kihara D., Lu H., Kolinski A., Skolnick J. TOUCHSTONE: an ab initio protein structure prediction method that uses threading-based tertiary restraints. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2001;10125-10130.
21. Kihara D., Zhang Y., Lu H., Kolinski A., Skolnick J. Ab initio protein structure prediction on a genomic scale: application to the Mycoplasma genitalium genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;5993-5998.
22. Kolinski A., Jaroszewski L., Rotkiewicz P., Skolnick J. An efficient Monte Carlo model of protein chains. Modeling the short-range correlations between side group center of mass. J. Phys. Chem. 102:1998;4628-4637.
23. Skolnick J., Kolinski A., Ortiz A. Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 38:2000;3-16.
24. Kabsch W. A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallog. A34:1978;827-828.
25. Gerstein M., Levitt M. Using iterative dynamic programming to obtain accurate pairwise and multiple alignments of protein structures. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 4:1996;59-67.
26. May A.C. Pairwise iterative superposition of distantly related proteins and assessment of the significance of 3-D structural similarity. Protein Eng. 9:1996;1093-1101.
27. Taylor W.R., Orengo C.A. Protein structure alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 208:1989;1-22.
28. Holm L., Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233:1993;123-138.
29. Grindley H.M., Artymiuk P.J., Rice D.W., Willett P. Identification of tertiary structure resemblance in proteins using a maximal common subgraph isomorphism algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 229:1993;707-721.
30. Mizuguchi K., Go N. Comparison of spatial arrangements of secondary structural elements in proteins. Protein Eng. 8:1995;353-362.
31. Bachar O., Fischer D., Nussinov R., Wolfson H. A computer vision based technique for 3-D sequence-independent structural comparison of proteins. Protein Eng. 6:1993;279-288.
32. Shindyalov I.N., Bourne P.E. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng. 11:1998;739-747.
33. Godzik A. The structural alignment between two proteins: is there a unique answer? Protein Sci. 5:1996;1325-1338.
34. Pearson W.R., Lipman D.J. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 85:1988;2444-2448.
35. Shindyalov I.N., Bourne P.E. An alternative view of protein fold space. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 38:2000;247-260.
36. de la Cruz X., Sillitoe I., Orengo C. Use of structure comparison methods for the refinement of protein structure predictions. I. Identifying the structural family of a protein from low-resolution models. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 46:2002;72-84.
37. Holm L., Sander C. Mapping the protein universe. Science. 273:1996;595-603.
38. Shindyalov I.N., Bourne P.E. An alternative view of protein fold space. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 38:2000;247-260.
39. Boutonnet N.S., Kajava A.V., Rooman M.J. Structural classification of alphabetabeta and betabetaalpha supersecondary structure units in proteins. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 30:1998;193-212.
40. Harrison A., Pearl F., Mott R., Thornton J., Orengo C. Quantifying the similarities within fold space. J. Mol. Biol. 323:2002;909-926.
41. Yang A.S., Honig B. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. I. Protein structural alignment and a quantitative measure for protein structural distance. J. Mol. Biol. 301:2000;665-678.
42. Betancourt M.R., Skolnick J. Universal similarity measure for comparing protein structures. Biopolymers. 59:2001;305-309.
43. Betancourt M.R., Skolnick J. Finding the needle in a haystack: educing native folds from ambiguous ab initio protein structure predictions. J. Comp. Chem. 22:2001;339-353.
44. Reva B.A., Finkelstein A.V., Skolnick J. What is the probability of a chance prediction of a protein structure with a RMSD of 6A? Fold. Des. 3:1998;141-147.