Application of hydration thermodynamics to the evaluation of protein structures and protein-ligand binding

Entropy

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1443-1468

  Harano, Yuichi ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Binding free energy; Hydration entropy 1; Hydration thermodynamics; Protein structure stability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867649170     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10994300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/e14081443     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Anfinsen, C.B. Principles that govern folding of protein chains. Science 1973, 181, 223-230.
2. Dill, K.A. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 7133-7155.
3. Xu, D.; Lin, S.L.; Nussiov, R. Protein binding versus protein folding: The role of hydrophilic bridges in protein associations. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 265, 68-84.
4. Hendsch, Z.S.; Tidor, B. Do salt bridges stabilize proteins: A continuum electrostatic analysis. Protein Sci. 1994, 3, 211-226.
5. Takano, K.; Yamagata, Y.; Fujii, S.; Yutani, K. Contribution of the hydrophobic effect to the stability of human lysozyme: Calorimetric studies and X-ray structural analyses of the nine valineto alanine mutants. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 688-689.
6. Pace, C.N. Polar group burial contribute more to protein stability than nonpolar group burial.m Biochemistry 2001, 40, 310-313.
7. Maxwell, K.L.; Davidson, A.R. Mutagenesis of a buried polar interaction in an SH3 domain: Sequence conservation provides the best prediction of stability effects. Biochemistry 1998, 37,16172-16182.
8. Isom, D.G.; Cataneda C.A.; Cannon, B.R.; Velu, P.D.; Garcia-Moreno E.B. Charges in thehydrophobic interior of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 16096-16100.
9. Weeks, J.D.; Pratt, L.R. Introduction to special issue on water and associated liquids. J. Stat. Phys.2011, 145, 207-208.
10. Klapper, M.H. On the nature of protein interior. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1971, 229, 557-566.
11. Tsai, J.; Taylor, R.; Chothia, C.; Gerstein, M. The packing density in proteins: Standard radii and volumes. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 290, 253-266.
12. Zhou, Y.; Vitkup, D.; Karplus, M. Native proteins are surface-molten solids: Application of the Lindemann criterion for the solid versus liquid state. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 285, 1371-1375.
13. Fleming, P.J.; Richards, F.M. Protein packing: Dependence on protein size, secondary structure and amino acid composition. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 299, 487-498.
14. Mitchell, J.B.O.; Price, S.L. The nature of the N-H O=C hydrogen-bond: An intermolecular perturbation-theory study of the formamide formaldehyde complex. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11,1217-1233.
15. Mitchell, J.B.O.; Price, S.L. On the relative strengths of amide...amide and amide...water hydrogen bonds. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1991, 180, 517-523.
16. Honig, B.; Cohen, F.E. Adding backbone to protein folding: Why proteins are polypeptides. Fold. Des. 1996, 1, R17-R20.
17. Baldwin, R.L. In search of the energetic role of peptide hydrogen bonds. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278,17581-17588.
18. Kauzmann, W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv. Protein Chem. 1959, 14, 1-63.
19. Lesser, G.J.; Rose, G.D. Hydrophobicity of amino acid subgroup in proteins. Proteins 1990, 8, 6-13.
20. Kinoshita, M.; Sugai, Y. Methodology of predicting approximate shapes and size distribution of micelles: Illustration for simple models. J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 1445-1455.
21. Dobson, C.M. Protein folding and misfolding. Nature 2003, 426, 884-890.
22. Asakura, S.; Oosawa, F. Interaction between particles suspended in solutions of macromolecules. J. Polym. Sci. 1958, 33, 183-192.
23. Dinsmore, A.D.; Yodh, A.G.; Pine, D.J. Entropic control of particle motion using passive surface microstructure. Nature 1996, 383, 239-242.
24. Anderson, V.J.; Lekkerkerker, H.N.W. Insights into phase transition kinetics from colloid science. Nature 2002, 416, 811-815.
25. Harano, Y.; Kinoshita, M. Large gain in translational entropy of water is a major driving force in protein folding. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 399, 342-348.
26. Harano, Y.; Kinoshita, M. Translational-entropy gain of solvent upon protein folding. Biophys. J. 2005, 89, 2701-2710.
27. Doig, A.J.; Sternberg, M.J.E. Side-chain conformational entropy in protein folding. Protein Sci. 1995, 4, 2247-2251.
28. Roth, R.; Harano, Y.; Kinoshita, M. Morphometric approach to the solvation free energy of complex molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 78101.
29. Harano, Y.; Roth, R.; Sugita, Y.; Ikeguchi, M.; Kinoshita, M Physical basis for characterizing native structures of proteins. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 437, 112-116.
30. Cann, N.M.; Patey, G.N. An investigation of the influence of solute size and insertion conditions on solvation thermodynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106, 8165-8195.
31. Kinoshita, M.; Harano, Y.; Akiyama, R. Changes in thermodynamic quantities upon contact of two solutes in solvent under isochoric and isobaric conditions. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 244504.
32. Imai, T.; Harano, Y.; Kinoshita M.; Kovalenko, A.; Hirata, F. Theoretical analysis on hydration thermodynamics of proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 125, 024911.
33. Kinoshita, M.; Matubayasi, N.; Harano, Y.; Nakahara, M. Pair-correlation entropy of hydrophobic hydration: Decomposition into translational and orientational contributions and analysis of solutesize effects. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 244512.
34. Imai, T.; Harano, Y.; Kinoshita M.; Kovalenko, A.; Hirata, F. Theoretical analysis on changes in thermodynamic quantities upon protein folding: Essential role of hydration. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 225102.
35. Kusalik, P.G.; Patey, G.N. On the molecular theory of aqueous electrolyte solutions. I. The solution of the RHNC approximation for models in finite concentration. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 7715-7738.
36. Kusalik, P.G.; Patey, G.N. The solution of the reference hypernetted-chain approximation for water-like models. Mol. Phys. 1988, 65, 1105-1119.
37. Kinoshita, M.; Bérard, D.R. Analysis of the bulk and surface-induced structure of electrolyte solutions using integral equation theories. J. Comput. Phys. 1996, 124, 230-241.
38. Kinoshita, M. Molecular origin of the hydrophobic effect: Analysis using the angle-dependent integral equation theory. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 024507.
39. Kinoshita, M. Water structure and phase transition near a surface. J. Sol. Chem. 2004, 33,661-687.
40. Ren, P.; Ponder, J.W. Polarizable atomic multipole water model for molecular mechanics simulation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5933-5947.
41. Morita, T. Theory of classical fluids: Hyper-netted chain approximation. III: A new integral equation for the pair distribution function. Prog. Theor. Phys. 1960, 23, 829-845.
42. Morita, T.; Hiroike, K. A new approach of the theory of classical fluids. III: General treatment of classical systems. Prog. Theor. Phys. 1961, 25, 537-578.
43. Connolly, M.L. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science 1983, 221, 709-713.
44. McDonald, I.K.; Thornton, J.M. Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 132, 1-10.
45. Snedon, S.F.; Tobias, D.J.; Brooks, C.L., III. Thermodynamics of amide hydrogen bond formation in polar and apolar solvents. J. Mol. Biol. 1989, 209, 817-820.
46. Fleming, P.J.; Rose, G.D. Do all backbone polar groups in proteins form hydrogen bonds?. Protein Sci. 2005, 14, 1911-1917.
47. Yoshidome, T.; Oda, K.; Harano, Y.; Roth, R.; Sugita, Y.; Ikeguchi, M.; Kinoshita, M. Free-energy function based on an all-atom model for proteins. Proteins 2009, 77, 950-961.
48. Yasuda, S.; Yoshidome, T.; Harano, Y.; Roth, R.; Oshima, H.; Oda, K.; Sugita, Y.; Ikeguchi, M.; Kinoshita, M. Free-energy function for discriminating the native fold of a protein from misfolded decoys. Proteins 2011, 79, 2161-2171.
49. Park, B.; Levitt, M. Energy functions that discriminates X-ray and near native folds from wellconstructed decoys. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 258, 367-392.
50. Simons, K.T.; Kooperberg, C.; Huang, E; Baker, D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 268, 209-225.
51. Simons, K.T.; Bonneau, R.; Ruczinski, I.; Baker D. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins 1999, 37, 171-176.
52. Samudrala, R.; Xia, Y.; Levitt, M.; Huang, E. S. A combined approach for ab initio construction of low resolution protein tertiary structures from sequence. In Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, Mauni Lani, Big Island, HI, USA, 4-9 January 1999; Volume 4, pp. 505-516.
53. Xia, Y.; Huang, E.S.; Levitt, M.; Samudrala, R. Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 300, 171-185.
54. Keasar, C.; Levitt, M. A novel approach to decoy set generation: Designing a physical energy function having local minima with native structure characteristics. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 329, 159-174.
55. Samudrala, R.; Levitt, M. A comprehensive analysis of 40 blind protein structure predictions. BMC Struct. Biol. 2002, 2, 3-18.
56. Samudrala, R.; Levitt, M. Decoys 'R' Us: A database of incorrect protein conformations to improve protein structure prediction. Protein Sci. 2000, 9, 1399-1401.
57. Güntert, P.; Braun, W.; Wüthrich, K. Efficient computation of three-dimensional protein structures in solution from nuclear magnetic resonance data using the program DIANA and the supporting programs CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 217, 517-530.
58. Bowie, J.U.; Lüthy, R.; Eisenberg, D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991, 253, 164-170.
59. Sippl, M.J. Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 1993, 7,473-501.
60. Lu, M.; Dousis, A.D.; Ma, J. OPUS-PSP: An orientation-dependent statistical all-atom potential derived from side-chain packing. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 376, 288-301.
61. Miyazawa, S.; Jernigan, R.L. How effective for fold recognition is a potential of mean force that includes relative orientations between contacting residues in proteins? J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122,024901:1-024901:18.
62. Lee, M.C.; Duan, Y. Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model. Proteins 2004, 55, 620-634.
63. Zhang, C.; Liu, S.; Zhou, H.; Zhou, Y. An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state. Protein Sci. 2004, 13,400-411.
64. Onizuka, K.; Noguchi, T.; Akiyama, Y.; Matsuda, H. Using data compression for multidimensional distribution analysis. Control Intell. Syst. 2002, 17, 48-54.
65. Zhou, H.; Zhou, Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci. 2002, 11,2714-2726.
66. Toby, D.; Elber, R. Distance-dependent, pair potential for protein folding: Results from linear optimization. Proteins 2000, 41, 40-46.
67. MacKerell, A.D., Jr.; Bashford, D.; Bellott, M.; Dunbrack, R.L., Jr.; Evanseck, J.D.; Field, M.J.;Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Guo, H.; Ha, S.; et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 3586-3616.
68. MacKerell, A.D., Jr.; Feig, M.; Brooks, C.L., III. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25,1400-1415.
69. Lee, M.S.; Salsbury, F.R., Jr.; Brooks, C.L., III. Novel generalized Born methods. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 10606-10614.
70. Lee, M.S.; Salsbury, F.R., Jr.; Brooks, C.L., III. New analytic approximation to the standard molecular volume definition and its application to generalized Born calculations. J. Comput.Chem. 2003, 24, 1348-1356.
71. Chocholousšová, J.; Feig, M. Balancing an accurate representation of the molecular surface in generalized born formalisms with integrator stability in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 719-729.
72. Smith, P.E. The alanine dipeptide free energy surface in solution. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111,5568-5579.
73. Mu, Y.; Kosov, D.S.; Stock, G. Conformational dynamics of trialanine in water. 2. Comparison of AMBER, CHARMM, GROMOS, and OPLS force fields to NMR and infrared experiments.J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5064-5073.
74. Chiba, S.; Harano, Y.; Roth, R.; Kinoshita, M.; Sakurai, M. Evaluation of protein-ligand binding free energy focused on its entropic components. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 550-560.
75. Adcock, S.A.; McCammon, J.A. Molecular dynamics: Survey of methods for simulating theactivity of proteins. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 1589-1615.
76. Chang, C.A.; Chen, W.; Gilson, M.K. Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 1534.
77. Hawkins, G.D.; Cramer, C.J.; Truhlar, D.G. Pairwise solute descreening of solute charges from adielectric medium. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 246, 122-l29.
78. Lamb, M.L.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Jorgensen, W.L. Estimation of the binding affinities of FKBP12 inhibitors using a linear response method. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 851.
79. Xu, Y.; Wang, R. A computational analysis of the binding affinities of FKBP12 inhibitors using the MM-PB/SA method. Proteins 2006, 64, 1058.
80. Jayachandran, G.; Shirts, M.R.; Park, S.; Pande, V.S. Parallelized-over-parts computation of absolute binding free energy with docking and molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125,084901.
81. Wang, J.; Deng, Y.; Roux, B. Absolute binding free energy calculations using molecular dynamics simulations with restraining potentials. Biophys. J. 2006, 91, 2798.
82. Fujitani, H.; Tanida, Y.; Ito, M.; Jayachandran, G.; Snow, C.D.; Shirts, M.R.; Sorin, E.J.; Pande, V.S. Direct calculation of the binding free energies of FKBP ligands. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123,084108.
83. Fujitani, H.; Tanida, Y.; Matsuura, A. Massively parallel computation of absolute binding free energy with well-equilibrated states. Phys. Rev. E 2009, 79, 021914.
84. Szep, S.; Park, S.; Boder, E.T.; Van Duyne, G.D.; Saven, J.G. Structural coupling between FKBP12 and buried water. Proteins 2009, 74, 603.
85. Connelly, P.R.; Aldape, R.A.; Bruzzese, F.J.; Chambers, S.P.; Fitzgibbon, M.J.; Fleming, M.A.; Itoh, S.; Livingston, D.J.; Navia, M.A.; Thomson, J.A.; et al. Enthalpy of hydrogen bond formation in a protein-ligand binding reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91,1964-1968.
86. Holt, D.A.; Luengo, J.I.; Yamashita, D.S.; Oh, H.-J.; Konialian, A.L.; Yen, H.-K.; Rozamus, L.W.;Brandt, M.; Bossard, M.J.; Levy, M.A.; et al. Design, synthesis, and kinetic evaluation of highaffinity FKBP ligands and the X-ray crystal structures of their complexes with FKBP12. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9925.
87. Marlow, M.S.; Dogan, J.; Frederick, K.K.; Valentine, K.G.; Wand, A.J. The role of conformational entropy in molecular recognition by calmodulin. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 352-358.
88. Irudayam, S.J.; Henchman, R.H. Entropic cost of protein-ligand binding and its dependence on the entropy in solution. J. Phys. Chem. 2009, 113, 5871-5884.