Protein binding versus protein folding: The role of hydrophilic bridges in protein associations

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 265, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 68-84

  Xu, Dong ^a   Lin, Shuo L ^b   Nussinov, Ruth ^a,c  

^a SAIC FREDERICK INC   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Free energy; Hydrophobicity; Protein association; Salt bridge; Solvation effect

Indexed keywords

CYCLIC AMP DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY TRANSFER; HYDROPHILICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOLVATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0031561809     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0712     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Antosiewicz J., Wlodek S. T., McCammon J. A. Acetylcholinesterase role of the enzymes chargedistribution in steering charged ligands toward the active site. Biopolymers. 39:1996;85-94.
2. Belsley D. A., Kuh E., Welsch R. E. Regression Diagnostics. 1980;John Wiley and Sons, New York.
3. Ben-Tal N., Honig B., Peitzsch R. M., Denisov G., McLaughlin S. Binding of small basic peptides to membranes containing acidic lipids: Theoretical models and experimental results. Biophys. J. 71:1996;561-575.
4. Bernal J. D. Structure of proteins. Nature. 143:1939;663-667.
5. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J. B., Meyer E. F., Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The protein data bank: A computer based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112:1977;535-542.
6. DelPhi User Guide. 1992;Biosym Technologies, San Diego.
7. Board J. A. Jr, Causey J. W., Leathrum J. F. Jr, Windemuth A., Schulten K. Accelerated molecular dynamics simulation with the parallel fast multipole algorithm. Chem. Phys. Letters. 198:1992;89-94.
8. Bockris O., Reddy A. K. N. Modern Electrochemistry. 1973;Plenum Press, New York.
9. Brooks B. R., Bruccoleri R. E., Olafson B. D., States D. J., Swaminathan S., Karplus M. CHARMm: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comp. Chem. 4(2):1983;187-217.
10. Brünger A. T. X-PLOR, Version 3.1, A System for X-ray Crystallography and NMR. 1992;The Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biophysics and BiochemistryYale University.
11. Chacko S., Silverton E., Kam-Morgan L., Smith-Gill S., Cohen G., Davies D. Structure of an antibody-lysozyme complex: Unexpected effect of a conservative mutation. J. Mol. Biol. 245:1995;261-274.
12. Cherfils J., Duquerroy S., Janin J. Protein-protein recognition analyzed by docking simulation. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 11:1991;271-280.
13. Connolly M. L. Analytical molecular surface calculation. J. Appl. Crystallog. 16:1983;548-558.
14. Connolly M. L. The molecular surface package. J. Mol. Graphics. 11:1993;139-141.
15. Creighton T. E. Proteins. 2nd edit. 1993;W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
16. Dao-pin S., Anderson D. E., Baase W. A., Dahlquist F. W., Matthews B. W. Structural and thermodynamic consequences of burying a charged residue within the hydrophobic core of T4 lysozyme. Biochemistry. 30:1991;11521-11529.
17. Dill K. A. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry. 29:1990;7133-7155.
18. Dillon W. R., Goldstein M. Multivariate Analysis. 1984;John Wiley and Sons, New York.
19. Eisenberg D., McLachlan A. D. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature. 319:1986;199-203.
20. Eisenberg D., Wesson M., Yamashita M. Interpretation of protein folding and binding with atomic solvation parameters. Chemica Scripta. 29A:1989;217-221.
21. Fersht A. R. Basis of biological specificity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 9:1984;145-147.
22. Fischer D., Lin S. L., Wolfson H. J., Nussinov R. A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J. Mol. Biol. 248:1995;459-477.
23. Getzoff E. D., Tainer J. A., Weiner P. K., Kollman P. A., Richardson J. S., Richardson D. C. Electrostatic recognition between superoxide and copper, zinc superoxide dismutase. Nature. 306:1983;287-390.
24. Getzoff E. D., Cabelli D. E., Fisher C. L., Parge H. E., Viezzoli M. S., Banci L., Hallewell R. A. Faster superoxide dismutase mutants designed by enhancing electrostatic guidance. Nature. 358:1993;347-351.
25. Gilson M. K., Honig B. H. The dielectric constant of a folded protein. Biopolymers. 25:1986;2097-2119.
26. Gilson M. K., Honig B. H. Calculation of electrostatic potential in an enzyme active site. Nature. 330:1987;84-86.
27. Gilson M. K., Honig B. H. Calculation of the total electrostatic energy of a macromolecular system: solvation energies, binding energies, and conformational analysis. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 4:1988;7-18.
28. Gilson M. K., Rashin A., Fine R., Honig B. On the calculation of electrostatic interactions in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 183:1985;503-516.
29. Gilson M. K., Sharp K. A., Honig B. H. Calculating the electrostatic potential of molecules in solution: method and error assessment. J. Comp. Chem. 9:1988;327-335.
30. Goto K. Hydrophobic accessible surface areas are proportional to binding energies of serine protease-protein inhibitor complexes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 206:1995;497-501.
31. Handel T. M., Williams S. A., DeGrado W. F. Metal ion-dependent modulation of the dynamics of a designed protein. Science. 261:1993;879-885.
32. Harbury P. B., Zhang T., Kim P. S. A switch between two-, three-, and four-stranded coiled coils in GCN4 leucine zipper mutants. Science. 262:1993;1401-1407.
33. Hartley R. W. Directed mutagenesis and barnase-barstar recognition. Biochemistry. 32:1993;5978-5984.
34. Harvey S. C., Hoekstra P. Dielectric relaxation spectra of water adsorbed on lysozyme. J. Phys. Chem. 76:1972;2987-2994.
35. Hass G. M., Ryan C. A. Carboxypeptidase inhibitor from potatoes. Methods Enzymol. 80:1981;779-790.
36. Hendsch Z. S., Tidor B. Do salt bridges stabilize proteins? A continuum electrostatic analysis. Protein Sci. 3:1994;211-226.
37. Honig B., Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science. 258:1995;1144-1149.
38. Honig B., Yang A. S. Free energy balance in protein folding. Advan. Protein Chem. 46:1995;27-59.
39. Honig B., Sharp K., Yang A. Macroscopic models of aqueous solutions: biogical and chemical applications. J. Phys. Chem. 97:1993;1101-1109.
40. Honig B. H., Hubbell W. L. Stability of "salt bridges" in membrane proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 81:1984;5412-5416.
41. Horton N., Lewis M. Calculation of the free energy of association for protein complexes. Protein Sci. 1:1992;169-181.
42. Hwang J.-K., Warshel A. Why ion pair reversal by protein engineering is unlikely to succeed. Nature. 334:1988;270-272.
43. Jackson R., Sternberg M. J. E. Protein surface area defined. Nature. 366:1993;638-638.
44. Jackson R., Sternberg M. J. E. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: Application to the docking problem. J. Mol. Biol. 250:1995;258-275.
45. Janin J., Chothia C. Role of hydrophobicity in the binding of coenzymes. Biochemistry. 17:1978;2943-2948.
46. Janin J., Chothia C. The structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Biol. Chem. 265:1990;16027-16030.
47. Kamtekar S., Schiffer J. M., Xiong H. Y., Babik J. M., Hecht M. H. Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. Science. 262:1993;1680-1685.
48. Kauzmann W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Advan. Protein Chem. 14:1959;1-63.
49. Klapper I., Hagstrom R., Fine R., Sharp K., Honig B. Focusing of electric fields in the active site of Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase: effects of ionic strength and amino-acid modification. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 1:1986;47-59.
50. Krystek S., Stouch T., Novotny J. Affinity and specificity of serine endopeptidase-protein inhibitor interactions: Empirical free energy calculation based on X-ray crystallographic structures. J. Mol. Biol. 234:1993;661-679.
51. Lee B., Richards F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol. 55:1971;379-400.
52. Lin S. L., Nussinov R., Fischer D., Wolfson H. J. Molecular surface representations by sparse critical points. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 18:1994;94-101.
53. Lin S. L., Tsai C. J., Nussinov R. A study of four-helix bundles: Investigating protein folding via similar architectural motifs in protein cores and in subunit interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 248:1995;151-161.
54. Matthew J. B. Electrostatic effects in proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 14:1985;387-417.
55. McAllister D., Smith J. R., Diserens N. J. Computer Modeling in Electrostatics. 1985;Research Studies PressWiley, New York.
56. Murphy K. P., Xie D., Thompson K. S., Amzel L. M., Freire E. Entropy in biological binding process: estimation of translational entropy loss. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 18:1994;63-67.
57. Neet K. E., Timm D. E. Conformational stability of dimeric proteins: Quantitative studies by equilibrium denaturation. Protein Sci. 3:1994;2167-2174.
58. Neter J., Wasserman W. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 1974;Richard D. Irwin, Inc. Homewood.
59. Nicholls A., Sharp K., Honig B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 11:1991;282-290.
60. Norel R., Lin S. L., Wolfson H. J., Nussinov R. Shape complementarity at protein-protein interfaces. Biopolymers. 34:1994;933-940.
61. Norel R., Lin S. L., Wolfson H. J., Nussinov R. Molecular surface complementarity at protein-protein interfaces: The critical role played by surface normals at well placed, sparse, points in docking. J. Mol. Biol. 252:1995;263-273.
62. Novotny J., Sharp K. Electrostatic fields in antibodies and antibody/antigen complexes. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 58:1992;203-224.
63. Parsegian V. A. Energy of an ion crossing a low dielectric membrane: solutions to four relevant electrostatic problems. Nature. 221:1969;844-846.
64. Raleigh D. P., DeGrado W. F. A de novo designed protein shows a thermally induced transition from a native to a molton globule-like state. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114:1992;10079-10081.
65. Rashin A., Honig B. On the environment of ionizable groups in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 173:1984;515-521.
66. Richards F. M. Areas, volumes, packing, and protein structure. Annu. Rev. Biochem. Bioeng. 6:1977;151-176.
67. Rodgers K., Sligar S. Surface electrostatics, reduction potentials and the internal dielectric constant of proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113:1991;9419-9421.
68. Russell S. T., Warshel A. Calculations of electrostatic energies in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 185:1985;389-404.
69. Seemüller U., Fritz H., Euliz M. Eglin elastase-cathepsing inhibitor from leeches. Methods Enzymol. 80:1981;804-816.
70. Sharp K. A., Honig B. Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 19:1990;301-332.
71. Simonson T., Perahia D., Brünger A. T. Microscopic theory of the dielectric properties of proteins. Biophys. J. 59:1991;670-690.
72. Slagle S. P., Kozack R. E., Subramaniam S. Role of electrostatics in antibody-antigen association: anti-hen egg lysozyme/lysozyme complex (HyHEL-5/HEL). J. Biomol. Struct. Dynam. 12:1994;439-456.
73. SPSS Inc. SPSS 6.1 Base System User's guide. 1994.
74. Svendsen I., Jonassen I., Hejgaard J., Boisen S. Amino acid sequence homology between a serine protease inhibitor from barely hordeum vulgare cultivar hiproly and potato inhibitor I. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 45:1980;389-395.
75. Takashima S., Schwan H. P. Dielectric dispersion of crystalline powders of amino acids, peptides, and proteins. J. Phys. Chem. 69:1965;4176-4182.
76. Tsai C. J., Lin S. L., Wolfson H., Nussinov R. Studies of protein-protein interfaces. Protein Sci. 1996.
77. -10 m for the subtilisin BPN′-protein proteinase inhibitor (Streptomyces subtilisin inhibitor) complex by a single photon counting technique. J. Biochem. 84:1978;1195-1202.
78. Vakser I. A., Aflalo C. Hydrophobic docking: a proposed enhancement to molecular recognition technique. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 20:1994;320-329.
79. Verhoeyen M., Milstein C., Winter G. Reshaping human antibodies: grafting an antilysozyme activity. Science. 239:1988;1534-1536.
80. Waldburger C. D., Schildbach J. F., Sauer R. T. Are buried salt bridges important for protein stability and conformational specificity. Nature Struct. Biol. 2:1995;122-128.
81. Wallqvist A., Jernigan R. L., Covell D. G. A preference-based free energy parameterization of enzyme-inhibitor binding applications to HIV-1 protease inhibitor design. Protein Sci. 4:1995;1881-1903.
82. Warshel A. Conversion of light energy to electrostatic energy in the proton pump of halobacterium halobium. Photochem. Photobiol. 30:1979;285-290.
83. Warshel A. Correlation between the structure and efficiency of light-induced proton pumps. Methods Enzymol. 127:1986;578-587.
84. Warshel A. What about protein polarity. Nature. 330:1987;15-16.
85. Warshel A., Aqvist J. Electrostatic energy and macromolecular function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 20:1991;267-298.
86. Warshel A., Russell S. T. Calculations of electrostatic interactions in biological systems and in solutions. Quart. Rev. Biophys. 17:1984;283-422.
87. Warwicker J., Watson H. C. Calculation of the electric potential in the active site cleft due to α-helix dipoles. J. Mol. Biol. 157:1982;671-679.
88. Windemuth A. Advanced algorithms for molecular dynamics simulation: the program PMD. Parallel Computing in Computational Chemistry. 1995;ACS Books Symposium Series.
89. Windemuth A., Schulten K. Molecular dynamics simulation on the Connection Machine. Mol. Simulation. 5:1991;353-361.
90. Xu D., Sheves M., Schulten K. Molecular dynamics study of the M412 intermediate of bacteriorhodopsin. Biophys. J. 69(6):1995;2745-2760.
91. Xu D., Phillips J. C., Schulten K. Protein response to external electric fields: relaxation, hysteresis, echo. J. Phys. Chem. 100:1996;12108-12121.
92. Young L., Jernigan B. L., Covell D. G. A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein-protein recognition. Protein Sci. 3:1994;717-729.