A case study of co-teaching in an inclusive secondary high-stakes world history i classroom

Theory and Research in Social Education

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 260-291

  Hover, Stephanie Van ^a   Hicks, David ^b   Sayeski, Kristin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Co teaching; Collaboration; High stakes testing; Special education; World history

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867498664     PISSN: 00933104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2012.705162     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Ashby, R., Lee, P., & Shemilt, D. (2005). Putting principles into practice: Teaching and planning. In M. S. Donovan & J. Brandsford (Eds.), How students learn: History in the classroom (pp. 79-178). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
2. Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36, 258-267.
3. Au, W. (2009). Social studies, social justice: W(h)ither the social studies in high-stakes testing? Teacher Education Quarterly, 36, 43-58.
4. Bain, R. B. (2005). "They thought the world was flat?": Applying the principles of How People Learn in teaching high school history. In M. S. Donovan & J. Brandsford (Eds.), How students learn: History in the classroom (pp. 179-213). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
5. Ball, D., & Forzani, F. (2007). What makes educational research "Educational"? 2007Wallace Foundation distinguished lecture. Educational Researcher, 36, 529-540.
6. Ball, S. J. (1994). Educational reform. London, England: Polity.
7. Ball, S. J. (1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal, 23, 257-274.
8. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 215-228.
9. Ball, S. J. (2008). The education policy debate. Bristol, England: Policy Press.
10. Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Barton, L. (1998). Markets, managerialism, and inclusive education. In P. Clough (Ed.) Managing inclusive education (pp. 79-91). London, England: Paul Chapman.
12. Bauwens, J., Hourcade, J. J., & Friend, M. (1989). Co-operative teaching: A model for general and special education integration. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 17-22.
13. Boon, R. T., Burke, M. D., Fore, C., & Spencer, V. G. (2006). The impact of cognitive organizers and technology-based practices on student success in secondary social studies classrooms. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(1), 5-15.
14. Bransford, J. D., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1-39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15. Comber, B., & Nixon, H. (2009). Teachers' work and pedagogy in an era of accountability. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics Of Education, 30, 333-345.
16. Connor, D. J., & Lagares, C. (2007). Facing high stakes in high school: 25 successful strategies from an inclusive social studies classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(2), 18-27.
17. Cook, B. G., McDuffie, K. A., Oshita, L., & Cook, C. (2011). Co-teaching for students with disabilities: A critical analysis of the empirical literature. In J. K. Kauffman & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), The handbook of special education (pp. 147-159). New York, NY: Routledge.
18. Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practice. In E. L. Meyer, G. A. Bergason, & R. J. Whelan (Eds.), Strategies for teaching exceptional children in inclusive settings (pp. 309-330). Denver, CO: Love.
19. Craig, C. J. (2004). The dragon in school backyards: The influence of mandated testing on school contexts and educators' narrative knowing. Teachers College Record, 106, 1229-1257.
20. De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 139-156. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139
21. De La Paz, S., & MacArthur, C. (2003). Knowing the how and why of history: Expectations for secondary students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 142-154.
22. De La Paz, S., Morales, P., & Winston, P. M. (2007). Source interpretation: Teaching students with and without LD to read and write historically. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 134-144.
23. Duke, D. L., & Reck, B. L. (2003). The evolution of educational accountability in the Old Dominion. In D. L. Duke, M. Grogan, P. D. Tucker, & W. F. Heinecke (Eds.), Educational leadership in an age of accountability: The Virginia experience (pp. 36-68). Albany: SUNY Press.
24. Fontana, J. L. (2004). Social studies and students with disabilities: Current status of instruction and a review of intervention research with middle and high school students. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Research in secondary schools: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 17, pp. 175-205). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
25. Fontana, J. L., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2007). Mnemonic strategy instruction in inclusive secondary social studies classes. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 345-355. doi: 10.177/07419325070280060401
26. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. NewYork, NY: Random House.
27. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (4th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
28. Goodson, I., & Mangan, J. M. (1995). Subject cultures and the introduction of classroom computers. British Educational Research Journal, 21, 613-628.
29. Grant, S. G. (2003). History lessons: Teaching, learning, and testing in U.S. high school classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Grant, S. G. (2006). (Ed.) Measuring history. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
31. Grant, S. G., & Gradwell, J. M. (Eds.) (2010). Teaching history with big ideas. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
32. Grant, S. G., & Salinas, C. (2008). Assessment and accountability in the social studies. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.) Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 219-238). New York, NY: Routledge.
33. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The persistence of presentism. Teachers College Record, 111, 2505-2534.
34. Hess, F. M., & Petrilli, M. J. (2007). No Child Left Behind: A Peter Lang primer. New York, NY: Peter Lang. (Original work published 2006)
35. Hudson, P. (1997). Using teacher-guided practice to help students with learning disabilities acquire and retain social studies content. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(1), 23-32.
36. Jeffrey, B. (2002). Performativity and primary teacher relations. Journal Education Policy, 17, 531-546.
37. Knackendoffel, E. A. (2007). Collaborative teaming in the secondary school. Focus on Exceptional Children, 40(4), 2-20.
38. Lee, P. (2005). Putting principles into practice: Understanding history. In M. S. Donovan & J. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History in the classroom (pp. 31-78). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
39. Lingard, B. (2007). Pedagogies of indifference. International Journal of Inclusive Education,11, 245-266. doi: 10.1080/13603110701237498
40. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational cost of standardized testing. New York, NY: Routledge.
41. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Murawski, W. W. (2009). Collaborative teaching in secondary schools: Making the co-teaching marriage work!. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
43. Murawski, W. W., & Swanson, H. L. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research. Remedial & Special Education, 22, 258.
44. Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
45. Parker, W. C. (1996). Introduction. Educating the democratic mind (pp. 1-22). Albany: SUNY Press.
46. Passe, J., & Beattie, J. (1994). Social studies instruction for students with mild disabilities. Remedial & Special Education, 15, 227-233.
47. Rex, L. A., & Nelson, M. C. (2004). How teachers' professional identities position high-stakes test preparation in their classrooms. Teachers College Record, 106, 1288-1331.
48. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392-416.
49. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Thornton, S. J. (1991). Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 237-248). New York, NY: MacMillan.
51. Thornton, S. J. (2001). Educating the educators: Rethinking subject matter and methods. Theory Into Practice, 40, 72-78.
52. Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 519-558.
53. van Hover, S. D. (2006). Teaching history in the Old Dominion: The impact of Virginia's accountability reform on seven beginning secondary history teachers. In S. G. Grant's Measuring History (pp. 195-220). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
54. van Hover, S. (2008). Professional development of social studies teachers. In L. Levstik & C. Tyson (Eds). Handbook of Research in Social Studies (pp. 352-372). New York, NY: Routledge.
55. van Hover, S., Hicks, D., & Irwin, W. (2007). Beginning teachers thinking historically? Negotiating the context of Virginia's high-stakes tests. International Journal of Social Education, 22(1), 85-115.
56. van Hover, S., Hicks, D., & Washington, E. (2011). Multiple paths to testable content? Differentiation in a high-stakes testing context. Social Studies Research and Practice, 6, 34-51.
57. van Hover, S., & Yeager, E.A. (2008). "I want to use my subject matter to . . . ": The role of purpose in one secondary U.S. History teachers' instructional decision-making. Canadian Journal of Education, 30, 670-690.
58. VanSledright, B. (2011). The challenge of rethinking history education: On practices, theory and policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
59. Villa, R. A., Thousand, J. S., & Nevin, A. I. (2008). A guide to co-teaching: Practical tips for facilitating student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
60. Webb, P. T. (2007). Accounting for teacher knowledge: Reterritorializations as epistemic suicide. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28, 279-295.
61. Weiss, M. P., & Brigham, F. J. (2000). Co-teaching and the model of shared responsibility: What does the research support? In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol 14. Educational interventions (pp. 217-245). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
62. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 495-519.
63. Yeager, E. A., & Davis, O. L. (Eds.) (2005). Wise social studies teaching in an age of high-stakes testing. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.