Source interpretation: Teaching students with and without LD to read and write historically

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 134-144

  De La Paz, Susan ^a   Morales, Petra ^b   Winston, Philip M ^c  

^a SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Milpitas Unified School District   (United States)

^c Palo Alto Unified School District   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34047127440     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00222194070400020401     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Afflerbach, P., & VanSledright, B. (2001). Hath! Doth! What? Middle graders reading innovative history text. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 696-707.
2. Ashby, M. G., & Lee, P. (1987). Children's concepts of empathy and understanding in history. In C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 62-88). London: Falmer Press.
3. Barton, K. C. (2002). "Oh, that's a tricky piece!" Children, mediated action, and the tools of historical time. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 161-185.
4. Barton, K. C. (2005). Primary sources in history: Breaking through the myths. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 745-753.
5. Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2003). Why don't more history teachers engage students in interpretation? Social Education, 67, 358-362.
6. Bower, B., & Lobdell, J. (1998). History alive! Six powerful constructivist strategies. Social Education, 62, 50-53.
7. Bushweller, K. (1998). The forgotten majority: AVID (Advancement Via Individual Determination) program for average achievers. The American School Board Journal, 185, 16-21.
8. Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students' ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 485-522.
9. De La Paz, S. (2001). Stop and dare. Intervention in School and Clinic., 36, 234-243.
10. De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 137-156.
11. De La Paz, S. (in press). Managing cognitive demands for writing: Comparing the effects of instructional components in strategy instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly.
12. Ferretti, R. P., MacArthur, C. A., & Okolo, C. M. (2001). Teaching for historical understanding in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 59-71.
13. Ferretti, R. P., & Okolo, C. M. (1996). Authenticity in learning: Multimedia design projects in the social studies for students with disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 450-460.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., et al. (2003). Enhancing mathematical problem solving among third-grade students with schema-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 635-647.
15. Glaser, C.W, Rieth, H.J., Colburn, L.K., & Peter, J. (1999). A description of the impact of multimedia anchored instruction on classroom interactions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14, 27-43.
16. Harmon, J.M., Katims, D.S., & Whittington, D. (1999). Helping middle school students learn with social studies texts. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32, 70-75.
17. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
18. Kinder, D., & Bursuck, B. (1993). History strategy instruction: Problem-solution-effect analysis, timeline, and vocabulary instruction. Exceptional Children, 59, 324-335.
19. Okolo, C. M., & Ferretti, R. P. (1997). Knowledge acquisition and technology-supported projects in the social studies for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 91-103.
20. Rouet, J. F., Britt, A., Mason, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 478-493.
21. Rouet, J. F., Favart, M., Britt, A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85-106.
22. Schumaker, J.B. Nolan, S. M., & Deshler, D.D. (1985). The error monitoring strategy. Lawrence, K.S: Center for Research on Learning, University of Kansas.
23. Stahl, S., Hynd, C., Britton, B., McNish, M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430-456.
24. U.S. Department of Education; Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development; Policy and Program Studies Service. (2005). Evaluation of the Teaching American History Program. Washington, DC: Education Publications Center.
25. VanSledright, B. A., & Frankes, L. (2000). Concept- and strategic-knowledge development in historical study: A comparative exploration in two fourth-grade classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 239-283.
26. Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73-87.
27. Young, K. M., & Leinhardt, G. (1998). Writing from primary documents: A way of knowing in history. Written Communication, 15, 25-68.