The Impact of Cognitive Organizers and Technology-Based Practices on Student Success in Secondary Social Studies Classrooms

Journal of Special Education Technology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 5-15

  Boon, Richard T ^a   Burke, Mack D ^a   Fore, Cecil ^a   Spencer, Vicky G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52649086141     PISSN: 01626434     EISSN: 23813121     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016264340602100101     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson-Inman L., Knox-Quinn C., Horney M., (1996). Computer-based study strategies for students with learning disabilities: Individual differences associated with adoption level. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 461–484.
2. Beck I. L., McKeown M., (1988). Toward meaningful accounts in history texts for young learners. Educational Researcher, 17, 31–39.
3. Beck I. L., McKeown M. G., Gromoll E.W., (1989). Learning from social studies textbooks. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 99–158.
4. Boyle J. R., (1996). The effects of a cognitive mapping strategy on the literal and inferential comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 86–98.
5. Boyle J. R., Weishaar M., (1997). The effects of expert-generated versus student-generated cognitive organizers on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 228–251.
6. Crank J., Bulgren J., (1993). Visual depictions as information organizers for enhancing achievement of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 140–147.
7. Deshler D., Schumaker J., Lenz K., Bulgren J., Hock M., Knight J., Ehren B., (2001). Ensuring content-area learning by secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 96–109.
8. De Simone C., Schmid R. F., McEwen L. A., (2000). Supporting the learning process with collaborative concept mapping using computer-based communication tools and processes. Unpublished manuscript, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, CA.
9. DiCecco V., Gleason M., (2002). Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository text. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 306–320.
10. Erickson J. A., (1999). The use of concept mapping in assessment of student learning in the middle school classroom. Unpublished master's thesis, Montana State University.
11. Farah M., Karls A., (1999). World history: The human experience. New York: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
12. Ferretti R. P., MacArthur C. D., Okolo C. M., (2001). Teaching for historical understanding in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 1–37.
13. Gersten R., Fuchs L.S., Williams J.P., Baker S., (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320.
14. Gleason M., Carnine D., Vala N., (1991). Cumulative versus rapid introduction of new information. Exceptional Children, 57, 353–358.
15. Harniss K., Dickson V., Kinder D., Hollenbeck L., (2001). Textual problems and instructional solutions: Strategies for enhancing learning from published history textbooks. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 17, 127–151.
16. Higgins K., Boone R., Lovitt T. C., (1996). Hypertext support for remedial students and students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 402–412.
17. Hudson P., Lignugaris-Kraft B., Miller T., (1993). Using content enhancements to improve the performance of adolescents with learning disabilities in content classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 106–126.
18. Inspiration Software, Inc. (2000). Inspiration 6.0 computer software. Portland, OR: Author.
19. Jitendra A., Hoppes M., Xin Y., (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction, The Journal of Special Education, 34, 127–139.
20. Kim A., Vaughn S., Wanzek J., Wei S., (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 105–118.
21. Lederer J., (2000). Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 91–106.
22. Mastropieri M. A., Scruggs T. E., (2004). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective teaching. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall/Merrill.
23. Mastropieri M. A., Scruggs T. E., Bakken J. P., Whedon C., (1996). Reading comprehension: A synthesis of research in learning disabilities. In Scruggs T. E., Mastropieri M. A., (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Intervention research (Vol. 10, Part B, pp. 201–227). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
24. Mastropieri M., Scruggs T., Graetz J., (2003). Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 103–116.
25. Mastropieri M.A., Scruggs T.E., Spencer V., Fontana J., (2003). Promoting success in high school world history: Peer tutoring versus guided notes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 52–65.
26. Paxton R., (1999). A deafening silence: History textbooks and the students who read them. Review of Educational Research, 69, 315–339.
27. Sturm J., Rankin-Erickson J., (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computer-generated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 124–139.
28. Talbott E., Lloyd J.W., Tankersley M., (1994). Effects of reading comprehension interventions with students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 223–232.
29. Tyson-Bernstein H., Woodward J., (1986). The great textbook machines and prospects for reform. Social Education, 50, 41–45.
30. Woodward A., (1987). Textbooks: Less than meets the eye. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 511–526.