Using teacher-guided practice to help students with learning disabilities acquire and retain social studies content

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 23-32

  Hudson, Pamela ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031285969     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1511090     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baker, S. K., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1994). Making information more memorable for students with learning disabilities through the design of instructional tools. LD Forum, 19(3) 14-18.
2. Berliner, D. C. (1984). The half-full glass: A review of research on teaching. In P. L. Hosford (Ed.), Using what we know about teaching (pp. 51-77). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3. Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational research (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
4. Brophy, J. (1983). Classroom organization and management. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 265-286.
5. Carlson, S. A., & Alley, G. R. (1981). Performance and competence of learning disabled and high-achieving high school students on essential cognitive skills (Research Report No. 53). Lawrence: The University of Kansas Institute for Research in Learning Disabilities.
6. Cawley, J. F. (1994). Science for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 67-71.
7. Christenson, S. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Thurlow, M. L. (1989). Critical instructional factors for students with mild handicaps: An integrative review. Remedial and Special Education, 10(5), 21-31.
8. Crank, J. N., & Bulgren, J. A. (1993). Visual depictions as information organizers for enhancing achievement of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 140-147.
9. Darch, C., & Gersten, R. (1986). Direction-setting activities in reading comprehension: A comparison of two appraoches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 235-243.
10. Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1988). An instructional model for teaching students how to learn. In J. L. Graden, J. E. Zins, & M. J. Curtis (Eds.)., Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 391-411). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
11. Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., Alley, G. R., Warner, M. M., & Clark, F. L. (1982). Learning disabilities in adolescent and young adult populations: Research implications. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15(1), 1-12.
12. Englert, C. S. (1984). Effective direct instruction practices in special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 5(2), 38-47.
13. Good, T., Grouws, D., & Ebmeier, H. (1983). Active mathematics teaching. New York: Longman.
14. Hudson, P. J. (1987). The pause procedure: A technique to help mildly handicapped students learn lecture content. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
15. Hudson, P. (1996). Using a learning set to increase learning disabled students' performance in social studies classes, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 78-85.
16. Hudson, P. J., Lignugaris-Kraft, B., & Miller, T.L. (1993). Using content enhancement to improve the performance of adolescents with learning disabilities in content classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 106-126.
17. Hunter, M. (1984). Knowing, teaching, and supervising. In P. L. Hosford (Ed.), Using what we know about teaching (pp. 169-193). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Design.
18. Kinder, D., & Bursuck, W. (1991). The search for a unified social studies curriculum: Does history really repeat itself? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 270-275.
19. Lloyd, J. W., Crowley, E. P., Kohler F. W., & Strain, P. S. (1988). Redefining the applied research agenda: Cooperative learning, prereferral, teacher consultation, and peer-mediated interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 43-52.
20. Maheady, L., Sacca, M. K., & Harper, G.F. (1988) Classwide peer tutoring with mildly handicapped high school students. Exceptional Children, 55, 52-59.
21. Passe, J., & Beattie, J. (1994). Social studies instruction for students with mild disabilities - A progress report. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 227-233.
22. Rosenshine, B. (1986a). Synthesis of research on explicit teaching. Educational Leadership, 43(7), 60-69.
23. Rosenshine, B. (1986b). Unsolved issues in teaching content: A critique of a lesson on federalist paper No. 10. Teaching & Teacher Education, 2, 301-308.
24. Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. D. Wittrock (Ed.), AERA handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376-391). New York: MacMillan.
25. Rowe, M. B. (1976). The pausing principle - two invitations to inquiry. Research on College Science Teaching, 5, 258-259.
26. Ruhl, K. L., Hughes, C. A., & Gajar, A. H. (1990). Efficacy of the pause procedure for enhancing learning disabled college students' long- and short-term recall of facts presented through lecture. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 55-64.
27. Ruhl, K. L., & Suritsky, S. (1995). The pause procedure and/or outline: Effect on immediate free recall and lecture notes taken by college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 2-11.
28. Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1984, March). Setting demand variables: A major factor in program planning for the LD adolescent. Topics in Language Disorders, 22-40.
29. Schumaker, J. B., Sheldon-Wildgen, J., & Sherman, J. A. (1980). An observational study of the academic and social behaviors of learning disabled adolescents in the regular classroom (Research Rep. No. 22). Lawrence: The University of Kansas Institute for Research in Learning Disabilities.
30. Utah State Office of Education. (1993, May). Special education rules. Salt Lake City: Author.