THE USE OF ACTION RESEARCH IN TEACHER EDUCATION

Participants in Mathematics Teacher Education: Individuals, Teams, Communities and Networks: Volume 3

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages 283-307

  Benke, Gertraud ^a   Hošpesová, Alena ^b   Tichá, Marie ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

^b University of South Bohemia eskéBud jovice   (China)

^c South Kazakhstan State Pedagogical University   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867437633     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Adler, J. (1997). Professionalism in process: mathematics teacher as researcher from a South African perspective. Educational Action Research, 5, 87-103.
2. Adler, J., Ball, D., Krainer, K., Lin, F. -L., & Novotna, J. (2005). Reflections on an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 359-381.
3. Altrichter, H. (1990). 1st das noch Wissenschaft? Darstellung und wissenschaftstheoretische Diskussion einer von Lehrern betriebenen Aktionsforschung [Is that still science? Presentation and scientific discussion of action research done by teachers]. München, Germany: Profil Verlag.
4. Altrichter H., Posch P., & Somekh B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work. An introduction to the methods of action research. London: Routledge.
5. Andreitz, I., Hanfstingl, B., & Müller, F. H. (2007). Projektbericht. Begleitforschung des IMST-Fonds der Schuljahre 2004/05 und 2005/06 [Project report. Results of the research on the IMST-Fond of the years 2004/05 and 2005/06]. Institut für Unterrichts- und Schulentwicklung, Universität Klagenfurt.
6. Ball, D. L. (2000). Working on the inside: Using one’s own practice as a site for studying mathematics teaching and learning. In E. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 365-402). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Benke, G., Erlacher, W., & Zehetmeier, S. (2006). Anhang zum Projekt IMST3 2004/05. Miniaturen zu IMST1 [appendix to the project report IMST3 2004/05. Miniatures on IMST2]. Klagenfurt: Institut für Unterrichts- und Schulentwicklung, Universität Klagenfurt.
8. Benke, G. (2004). Dokumentenanalyse der Innovationen der Schwerpunktprogramme S1-S4 im Projektjahr 2001-02 [Analysis of the reports of the projects of the programmes S1-S4 in 2001/02]. In K. Krainer (Ed.), Ergebnisbericht zum Projekt IMST2 2002/03 (pp. 371-398). Klagenfurt, Austria: Universität Klagenfurt, Fakultät für Interdisziplinäre Forschung und Fortbildung, Abteilung “Schule und gesellschaftliches Lernen”.
9. Braz Dias, A. L. (1999). Becoming critical mathematics educators through action research. Educational Action Research, 7, 15-34.
10. Bromme, R. (1994). Beyond subject matter: A psychological topology of Ts’ professional knowledge. In R. e. a. Biehler (Ed.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 73 -88). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Bullough, R. V. J., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13-21.
13. Christenson, M., Slutsky, R., Bendau, S., Covert, J., Dyer, J., Risko, G., & Johnston, M. (2002). The rocky road of teachers becoming action researchers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 259-272.
14. Climent, N., & Carrillo, J. (2001). Developing and researching professional knowledge with primary teachers. In J. Novotnä (Ed.), CERME 2. European research in mathematics education II, Part 1 (pp. 269-280). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University, Faculty of Education.
15. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2-11.
16. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran Nejad & C. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 249-305). Washington, DC: AERA.
17. Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Rundell, B., & Evans, D. (2003). The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning. In Research evidence in education library. Version 1.1. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
18. Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Thomason, S., & Firth, A. (2005). The impact of collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) on classroom teaching and learning. Review: How do collaborative and sustained CPD and sustained but not collaborative CPD affect teaching and learning? In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
19. Doerr, H. M., & Tinto, P. P. (2000). Paradigms for teacher-centered, classroom-based research. In E. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 403-427). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton, Keynes: Open University Press.
21. Even, R. (2005). Integrating knowledge and practice at MANOR in the development of providers of professional development for teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 343-357.
22. Feldman, A. (2003). Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 26-28.
23. Feldman, A., & Minstrell, J. (2000). Action research as a research methodology for the study of the teaching and learning of science. In E. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 429-435). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Fendler, L. (2003). Teacher reflection in a hall of mirrors: Historical influences and political reverberations. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 16-25.
25. Foreman-Peck, L. (2005). A review of existing models ofpractitioner research. A review undertaken for The National Academy of Gifted and Talented Youth. Coventry, UK: Warwick University.
26. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3 ed.). New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
27. García, M., Sánchez, V., Escudero, I., & Llinares, S. (2006). The dialectic relationship between research and practice in mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 109128.
28. Goodell, J. E. (2006). Using critical incident reflections: A self-study as a mathematics teacher educator. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 221-248.
29. Gough, D., Kiwan, D., Sutcliffe, K., Simpson, D., & Houghton, N. (2003). A systematic map and synthesis review of the effectiveness of personal development planning for improving student learning. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit.
30. Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Toward a mew equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 4(2&3), 145-187.
31. Halai, A. (1998). Mentor, mentee, and mathematics: A story of professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 295-315.
32. Harel, G., & Kien, H. L. (2004). Mathematics Ts' knowledge base: Preliminary results. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 25-32). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.
33. Helus, Z. (2001). Ctyri teze k tématu „zrnena skoly“[Four theses on school reform]. Pedagogika, 51(1), 25-41.
34. Jaworski, B. (1998). Mathematics teacher research: Process, practice and the development of teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 3-31.
35. Jaworski, B. (2003). Research practice into/influencing mathematics teaching and learning development: Towards a theoretical framework based on co-learning partnerships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 249-282.
36. Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning and teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 187-211.
37. Krainer, K. (1996). Some considerations on problems and perspectives of in service mathematics teacher education. In C. Alsina (Ed.), 8th International congress on Mathematics Education: Selected Lectures (pp. 303-321). Sevilla, Spain: SAEM Thales.
38. Krainer, K. (2006). Action research and mathematics teacher education. Editorial. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 213—219.
39. Krainer, K. (2007). Die Programme IMST und SINUS: Reflektionen über Ansatz, Wirkungen und Weiterentwicklungen [The programmes IMST and SINUS: reflection on the approach, the effects and further developments]. In D. Höttecke (Ed.), Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung im internationalen Vergleich. Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik. Tagungsband der Jahrestagung 2006 in Bern (pp. 20-48). Münster, Germany: Lit Verlag.
40. Krainer, K., Dörfler, W., Jungwirth, H., Kühnelt, H., Rauch, F., & Stern, T. (2002). Lernen im Aufbruch: Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften. Pilotprojekt IMST2 [Learning in the making: Mathematics and the natural sciences. Pilotproject IMST2]. Innsbruck, Austria: Studienverlag.
41. Krainer, K., & Goffree, F. (1999). Investigations into teacher education: Trends, future research and collaboration. In K. Krainer, F. Goffree, & P. Berger (Eds.), European research in mathematics education I.III. On research in mathematics teacher education (pp. 223-242). Osnabrück, Germany: Forschungsinstitut für Mathematikdidaktik.
42. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Lewin, K. (1948). Action research and minority problems. In G. W. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts (pp. 201-216). New York: Harper & Brothers.
44. Losito, B., Pozzo, G., & Somekh, B. (1998). Exploring the labyrinth of first and second order inquiry in action research. Educational Action Research, 6, 219-240.
45. Masters, J. (2000). The History of action research [Electronic version]. Action Research E-Reports. Retrieved 21.08.2007.
46. Melrose, M. J. (2001). Maximizing the rigor of action research: Why would you want to? How could you? Field Methods, 13(2), 160-180.
47. Nickerson, S. D., & Moriarty, G. (2005). Professional communities in the context of teachers’ professional lives: A case of mathematics specialists. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 113-140.
48. Ponte, J. P., Serrazina, L., Sousa, O., & Fonseca, H. (2003). Professionals investigate their own practice. Paper presented at the CERME III. European Congress of Mathematics Education.
49. Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1999). Effects of collaborative action research on the knowledge of five Canadian teacher-researchers. The Elementary School Journal, 99, 255-274.
50. Scherer, P., Söbeke, E., & Steinbring, H. (2004). Praxisleitfaden zur kooperativen Reflexion des eigenen Mathematikunterrichts [A practitioners guide to cooperative reflection of ones’ own mathematics classroom teaching]. Unpublished manuscript, Universitäten Bielefeld, & Dortmund.
51. Scherer, P., & Steinbring, H. (2006). Noticing children’s learning processes - Teachers jointly reflect on their own classroom interaction for improving mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 157-185.
52. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
53. Schuster, A. (2008). Warum Lehrerinnen und Lehrer schreiben [Why teachers write]. Doctoral thesis. Klagenfurt, Austria: University of Klagenfurt.
54. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
55. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform, Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
56. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
57. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58. Tichä, M. (2003). Following the path discovering fractions. In J. Novotnä (Ed.), International Symposium Elementary Mathematics Teaching (SEMT 05) Proceedings (pp. 17-26). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University, Faculty of Education.
59. Tichä, M., & Hospesovä, A. (2006). Qualified pedagogical reflection as a way to improve mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 129-156.
60. Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13-22.
61. Watling, R., Catton, T., Hignett, C., & Moore, A. (2000). Critical reflection by correspondence: perspectives on a junior school ‘media, mathematics and the environment’ workshop. Educational Action Research, 8, 419-434.
62. Watson, A., & De Geest, E. (2005). Principled teaching for deep progress: Improving mathematical learning beyond methods and materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 209-234.
63. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.