Determinants of exon-level evolutionary rates in arabidopsis species

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Volumn 2012, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 389-415

  Wu, Gideon C T ^a,b   Chen, Feng Chi ^a,b,c,d  

^a NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDICAL CENTER   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; Exonic evolutionary rates; Nonsynonymous substitution rate; Principal component regression; Synonymous substitution rate

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA;

ALTERNATIVE RNA SPLICING; ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXON; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEIC ACID BASE SUBSTITUTION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ANIMALIA; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 84864254282     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11769343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4137/EBO.S9743     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Li W-H. Molecular Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.; 1997.
2. Pal C, Papp B, Lercher MJ. An integrated view of protein evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2006;7:337-48.
3. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102:14338-43.
4. Popescu CE, Borza T, Bielawski JP, Lee RW. Evolutionary rates and expression level in Chlamydomonas. Genetics. 2006;172:1567-76.
5. Park SG, Choi SS. Expression breadth and expression abundance behave differently in correlations with evolutionary rates. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2010;10:241.
6. Yang L, Gaut BS. Factors that contribute to variation in evolutionary rate among Arabidopsis genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2011;28: 2359-69.
7. Liao B-Y, Scott NM, Zhang J. Impacts of gene essentiality, expression pattern, and gene compactness on the evolutionary rate of mammalian proteins. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2006;23:2072-80.
8. Liao B-Y, Weng M-P, Zhang J. Impact of extracellularity on the evolutionary rate of mammalian proteins. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2010;2: 39-43.
9. Tang CSM, Epstein RJ. A structural split in the human genome. PLoS One. 2007;2:e603.
10. Zhang L, Lu HHS, Chung W-y, Yang J, Li W-H. Patterns of segmental duplication in the human genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2005;22:135-41.
11. Duret L, Galtier N. Biased gene conversion and the evolution of mammalian genomic landscapes. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 2009;10:285-311.
12. Galtier N, Duret L, Glemin S, Ranwez V. GC-biased gene conversion promotes the fixation of deleterious amino acid changes in primates. Trends in Genetics. 2009;25:1-5.
13. Lin YS, Hsu WL, Hwang JK, Li WH. Proportion of solvent-exposed amino acids in a protein and rate of protein evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007;24:1005-11.
14. Ramsey DC, Scherrer MP, Zhou T, Wilke CO. The relationship between relative solvent accessibility and evolutionary rate in protein evolution. Genetics. 2011;188:479-88.
15. Brown CJ, Johnson AK, Daughdrill GW. Comparing models of evolution for ordered and disordered proteins. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2010;27:609-21.
16. Brown CJ, Takayama S, Campen AM, et al. Evolutionary rate heterogeneity in proteins with long disordered regions. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 2002;55:104-10.
17. Chen FC, Pan CL, Lin HY. Independent effects of alternative splicing and structural constraint on the evolution of mammalian coding exons. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2011;29:187-93.
18. Wolf YI, Gopich IV, Lipman DJ, Koonin EV. Relative contributions of intrinsic structural-functional constraints and translation rate to the evolution of protein-coding genes. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2010;2:190-99.
19. Kazi JU, Kabir NN, Soh J-W. Bioinformatic prediction and analysis of eukaryotic protein kinases in the rat genome. Gene. 2008;410:147-53.
20. Hanks S, Quinn A, Hunter T. The protein kinase family: conserved features and deduced phylogeny of the catalytic domains. Science. 1988;241: 42-52.
21. Hallegger M, Llorian M, Smith CWJ. Alternative splicing: global insights. FEBS Journal. 2010;277:856-66.
22. Keren H, Lev-Maor G, Ast G. Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2010;11: 345-55.
23. Chen FC, Chaw SM, Tzeng YH, Wang SS, Chuang TJ. Opposite evolutionary effects between different alternative splicing patterns. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007;24:1443-6.
24. Chen FC, Wang SS, Chen CJ, Li WH, Chuang TJ. Alternatively and constitutively spliced exons are subject to different evolutionary forces. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2006;23:675-82.
25. Barbazuk WB, Fu Y, McGinnis KM. Genome-wide analyses of alternative splicing in plants: opportunities and challenges. Genome Research. 2008;18:1381-92.
26. Kim E, Goren A, Ast G. Alternative splicing: current perspectives. BioEssays. 2008;30:38-47.
27. Kim E, Magen A, Ast G. Different levels of alternative splicing among eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007;35:125-31.
28. Wang BB, Brendel V. Genomewide comparative analysis of alternative splicing in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:7175-80.
29. Filichkin SA, Priest HD, Givan SA, et al. Genome-wide mapping of alternative splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Research. 2010;20: 45-58.
30. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2009;60:561-88.
31. Mable BK. 'Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants': myths and mechanisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2004;82:453-66.
32. Vision TJ, Brown DG, Tanksley SD. The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science. 2000;290:2114-7.
33. Lockton S, Gaut BS. Plant conserved non-coding sequences and paralogue evolution. Trends in Genetics. 2005;21:60-5.
34. Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2005;6:197-208.
35. Uversky VN. Intrinsically disordered proteins from A to Z. The International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology. 2011;43:1090-103.
36. Uversky VN, Dunker AK. Understanding protein non-folding. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Proteins and Proteomics. 2010;1804:1231-64.
37. Carmel L, Koonin EV. A universal nonmonotonic relationship between gene compactness and expression levels in multicellular eukaryotes. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2009;1:382-90.
38. Ren X-Y, Vorst O, Fiers MWEJ, Stiekema WJ, Nap J-P. In plants, highly expressed genes are the least compact. Trends in Genetics. 2006;22: 528-32.
39. Drummond DA, Raval A, Wilke CO. A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2006;23: 327-37.
40. Plotkin JB, Fraser HB. Assessing the determinants of evolutionary rates in the presence of noise. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007;24:1113-21.
41. Kersey PJ, Staines DM, Lawson D, et al. Ensembl Genomes: an integrative resource for genome-scale data from non-vertebrate species. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;40:D91-7.
42. Youens-Clark K, Buckler E, Casstevens T, et al. Gramene database in 2010: updates and extensions. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;39:D1085-94.
43. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32:1792-7.
44. Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M. The Sequence Read Archive. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;39:D19-21.
45. Roberts A, Pimentel H, Trapnell C, Pachter L. Identification of novel transcripts in annotated genomes using RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2011;27: 2325-9.
46. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg S. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biology. 2009;10:R25.
47. Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1105-11.
48. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAM tools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078-9.
49. Yang Z. PAML 4: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007;24:1586-91.
50. Yang Z, Nielsen R. Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2000;17:32-43.
51. Nekrutenko A, Makova KD, Li W-H. The KA/KS ratio test for assessing the protein-coding potential of genomic regions: an empirical and simulation study. Genome Research. 2002;12:198-202.
52. Cheng J, Randall AZ, Sweredoski MJ, Baldi P. SCRATCH: a protein structure and structural feature prediction server. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005;33:W72-6.
53. Ward JJ, McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Buxton BF, Jones DT. The DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder. Bioinformatics. 2004;20: 2138-9.
54. Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010;38:D211-22.
55. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421.
56. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2011. Available at: http://www.R-project.org.
57. Yang H. In plants, expression breadth and expression level distinctly and non-linearly correlate with gene structure. Biology Direct. 2009;4:45; discussion 45.
58. Camiolo S, Rau D, Porceddu A. Mutational biases and selective forces shaping the structure of Arabidopsis genes. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6356.
59. Woody JL, Severin AJ, Bolon Y-T, et al. Gene expression patterns are correlated with genomic and genic structure in soybean. Genome. 2011;54: 10-8.
60. Charlesworth B. Fundamental concepts in genetics: Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2009;10:195-205.
61. Templeton AR. Population genetics and microevolutionary theory. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2006.
62. Tsai IJ, Bensasson D, Burt A, Koufopanou V. Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: Quantifying the life cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:4957-62.
63. Lundemo S, Falahati-Anbaran M, StenØIen HK. Seed banks cause elevated generation times and effective population sizes of Arabidopsis thaliana in northern Europe. Molecular Ecology. 2009;18:2798-811.
64. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell. 2008;134: 341-52.
65. Slotte T, Bataillon T, Hansen TT, St. Onge K, Wright SI, Schierup MH. Genomic determinants of protein evolution and polymorphism in Arabidopsis. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2011;3:1210-9.
66. Chen FC, Liao BY, Pan CL, Lin HY, Chang AYF. Assessing determinants of exonic evolutionary rates in mammals. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2012; Accepted.
67. Lavner Y, Kotlar D. Codon bias as a factor in regulating expression via translation rate in the human genome. Gene. 2005;345:127-138.
68. Hiraoka Y, Kawamata K, Haraguchi T, Chikashige Y. Codon usage bias is correlated with gene expression levels in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes to Cells. 2009;14:499-509.
69. Duret L, Mouchiroud D. Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96:4482-7.