Erratum: Impacts of gene essentiality, expression pattern, and gene compactness on the evolutionary rate of mammalian proteins (Molecular Biology and Evolution (2006) 23, (2072-2080) DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl076);Impacts of gene essentiality, expression pattern, and gene compactness on the evolutionary rate of mammalian proteins

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 2072-2080

  Liao, Ben Yang ^a   Scott, Nicole M ^a   Zhang, Jianzhi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolutionary rate; Expression level; Gene compactness; Gene essentiality; Mammals; Tissue specificity

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ESSENTIAL GENE; EVOLUTION; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENOME; INTRON; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR SIZE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; TISSUE SPECIFICITY; YEAST;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 33749579409     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm043     Document Type: Erratum

References (57)

1. Akashi H. 2003. Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. Genetics 164:1291-303.
2. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403-10.
3. Brotherton J. 1975. The counting and sizing of spermatozoa from ten animal species using a Coulter counter. Andrologia 7:169-85.
4. Castillo-Davis CI, Hartl DL. 2003. Conservation, relocation and duplication in genome evolution. Trends Genet 19:593-7.
5. Castillo-Davis CI, Mekhedov SL, Hartl DL, Koonin EV, Kondrashov FA. 2002. Selection for short introns in highly expressed genes. Nat Genet 31:415-8.
6. Comeron JM, Kreitman M. 2002. Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection. Genetics 161:389-410.
7. Dayhoff MO. 1972. Atlas of protein sequence and structure. Washington, DC: National Biomedical Research Foundation.
8. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH. 2005. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:14338-43.
9. Drummond DA, Raval A, Wilke CO. 2006. A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol 23:327-37.
10. Duret L, Mouchiroud D. 2000. Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol Biol Evol 17:68-74.
11. Ellis RJ, Pinheiro TJ. 2002. Medicine: danger-misfolding proteins. Nature 416:483-4.
12. Fraser HB. 2005. Modularity and evolutionary constraint on proteins. Nat Genet 37:351-2.
13. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW. 2002. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296:750-2.
14. Gumucio DL, Shelton DA, Bailey WJ, Slightom JL, Goodman M. 1993. Phylogenetic footprinting reveals unexpected complexity in trans factor binding upstream from the epsilon-globin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:6018-22.
15. Hahn MW, Kern AD. 2005. Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. Mol Biol Evol 22:803-6.
16. Hastings KE. 1996. Strong evolutionary conservation of broadly expressed protein isoforms in the troponin I gene family and other vertebrate gene families. J Mol Evol 42:631-40.
17. He X, Zhang J. 2006. Toward a molecular understanding of pleiotropy. Genetics. Forthcoming.
18. Hirsh AE, Fraser HB. 2001. Protein dispensability and rate of evolution. Nature 411:1046-9.
19. Hubbell E, Liu WM, Mei R. 2002. Robust estimators for expression analysis. Bioinformatics 18:1585-92.
20. Hughes AL. 1999. Adaptive evolution of genes and genomes. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Hughes AL, Nei M. 1988. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature 335:167-70.
22. Hurst LD, Smith NG. 1999. Do essential genes evolve slowly? Curr Biol 9:747-50.
23. Jordan IK, Rogozin IB, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. 2002. Essential genes are more evolutionarily conserved than are nonessential genes in bacteria. Genome Res 12:962-8.
24. Kasprzyk A, Keefe D, Smedley D, London D, Spooner W, Melsopp C, Hammond M, Rocca-Serra P, Cox T, Birney E. 2004. EnsMart: a generic system for fast and flexible access to biological data. Genome Res 14:160-9.
25. Kimura M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kimura M, Ohta T. 1974. On some principles governing molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:2848-52.
27. Kondrashov FA, Ogurtsov AY, Kondrashov AS. 2004. Bioinformatical assay of human gene morbidity. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1731-7.
28. Lemos B, Bettencourt BR, Meiklejohn CD, Hartl DL. 2005. Evolution of proteins and gene expression levels are coupled in Drosophila and are independently associated with mRNA abundance, protein length, and number of protein-protein interactions. Mol Biol Evol 22:1345-54.
29. Li WH. 1997. Molecular evolution. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
30. Liao BY, Zhang J. 2006a. Low rates of expression-profile divergence in highly-expressed genes and tissue-specific genes during mammalian evolution. Mol Biol Evol 23:1119-28.
31. Liao BY, Zhang J. 2006b. Evolutionary conservation of expression profiles between human and mouse orthologous genes. Mol Biol Evol 23:530-40.
32. Lu J, Wu CI. 2005. Weak selection revealed by the whole-genome comparison of the X chromosome and autosomes of human and chimpanzee. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4063-7.
33. Makino T, Gojobori T. 2006. The evolutionary rate of a protein is influenced by features of the interacting partners. Mol Biol Evol 23:784-9.
34. Malcom CM, Wyckoff GJ, Lahn BT. 2003. Genic mutation rates in mammals: local similarity, chromosomal heterogeneity, and X-versus-autosome disparity. Mol Biol Evol 20:1633-41.
35. Minton AP. 2000. Implications of macromolecular crowding for protein assembly. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10:34-9.
36. Nembaware V, Crum K, Kelso J, Seoighe C. 2002. Impact of the presence of paralogs on sequence divergence in a set of mousehuman orthologs. Genome Res 12:1370-6.
37. Ohta T. 1992. The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:263-86.
38. Pal C, Papp B, Hurst LD. 2001a. Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158:927-31.
39. Pal C, Papp B, Hurst LD. 2001b. Does the recombination rate affect the efficiency of purifying selection? The yeast genome provides a partial answer. Mol Biol Evol 18:2323-6.
40. Pal C, Papp B, Hurst LD. 2003. Genomic function: rate of evolution and gene dispensability. Nature 421:496-7.
41. Rocha EP, Danchin A. 2004. An analysis of determinants of amino acids substitution rates in bacterial proteins. Mol Biol Evol 21:108-16.
42. Sherman F. 1991. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol 194:3-21.
43. Smith NG, Eyre-Walker A. 2003. Human disease genes: patterns and predictions. Gene 318:169-75.
44. Su AI, Wiltshire T, Batalov S, et al. (13 co-authors). 2004. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6062-7.
45. Subramanian S, Kumar S. 2004. Gene expression intensity shapes evolutionary rates of the proteins encoded by the vertebrate genome. Genetics 168:373-81.
46. Veeramachaneni V, Makalowski W, Galdzicki M, Sood R, Makalowska I. 2004. Mammalian overlapping genes: the comparative perspective. Genome Res 14:280-6.
47. Vinogradov AE. 2004. Compactness of human housekeeping genes: selection for economy or genomic design? Trends Genet 20:248-53.
48. Wall DP, Hirsh AE, Fraser HB, Kumm J, Giaever G, Eisen MB, Feldman MW. 2005. Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5483-8.
49. Wang PJ, McCarrey JR, Yang F, Page DC. 2001. An abundance of X-linked genes expressed in spermatogonia. Nat Genet 27:422-6.
50. Wilson AC, Carlson SS, White TJ. 1977. Biochemical evolution. Annu Rev Biochem 46:573-639.
51. Winter EE, Goodstadt L, Ponting CP. 2004. Elevated rates of protein secretion, evolution, and disease among tissue-specific genes. Genome Res 14:54-61.
52. Yanai I, Benjamin H, Shmoish M, et al. (12 co-authors). 2005. Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification. Bioinformatics 21:650-9.
53. Yang J, Gu Z, Li WH. 2003. Rate of protein evolution versus fitness effect of gene deletion. Mol Biol Evol 20:772-4.
54. Yang Z. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci 13:555-6.
55. Zhang J. 2001. Protein-length distributions for the three domains of life. Trends Genet 16:107-9.
56. Zhang J, He X. 2005. Significant impact of protein dispensability on the instantaneous rate of protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol 22:1147-55.
57. Zhang L, Li WH. 2004. Mammalian housekeeping genes evolve more slowly than tissue-specific genes. Mol Biol Evol 21:236-9.