Factors that contribute to variation in evolutionary rate among arabidopsis genes

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 2359-2369

  Yang, Liang ^a   Gaut, Brandon S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

gene duplication; gene expression; nonsynonymous substitution; synonymous substitution

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS LYRATA; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; EVOLUTIONARY RATE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; TISSUE SPECIFICITY;

ARABIDOPSIS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, DUPLICATE; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS LYRATA; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 79961064486     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr058     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Akhunov ED, Goodyear AW, Geng S, et al. (33 co-authors). 2003. The organization and rate of evolution of wheat genomes are correlated with recombination rates along chromosome arms. Genome Res. 13:753-763. (Pubitemid 36621735)
2. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. (Pubitemid 27359211)
3. Alvarez-Valin F, Jabbari K, Bernardi G. 1998. Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in mammalian genes: intragenic correlations. J Mol Evol. 46:37-44. (Pubitemid 28047237)
4. Beilstein MA, Nagalingum NS, Clements MD, Manchester SR, Mathews S. 2010. Dated molecular phylogenies indicate a Miocene origin for Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:18724-18728.
5. Blanc G, Hokamp K, Wolfe KH. 2003. A recent polyploidy superimposed on older large-scale duplications in the Arabidopsis genome. Genome Res. 13:137-144. (Pubitemid 36575763)
6. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. 2004. Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell. 16:1679-1691. (Pubitemid 38908768)
7. Bowers JE, Chapman BA, Rong J, Paterson AH. 2003. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 422:433-438. (Pubitemid 36411396)
8. Castillo-Davis CI, Hartl DL, Achaz G. 2004. cis-Regulatory and protein evolution in orthologous and duplicate genes. Genome Res. 14:1530-1536. (Pubitemid 39193403)
9. Chin CS, Chuang JH, Li H. 2005. Genome-wide regulatory complexity in yeast promoters: separation of functionally conserved and neutral sequence. Genome Res. 15:205-213. (Pubitemid 40309384)
10. Clark RM, Schweikert G, Toomajian C, et al. (18 co-authors). 2007. Common sequence polymorphisms shaping genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 317:338-342. (Pubitemid 47106367)
11. Davis JC, Petrov DA. 2004. Preferential duplication of conserved proteins in eukaryotic genomes. PLoS Biol. 2:E55.
12. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH. 2005. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102:14338-14343. (Pubitemid 41429699)
13. Drummond DA, Raval A, Wilke CO. 2006. A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 23:327-337. (Pubitemid 43100047)
14. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. 2008. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant contraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell. 134:341-352. (Pubitemid 352010328)
15. Duret L, Mouchiroud D. 2000. Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol Biol Evol. 17:68-74. (Pubitemid 30056993)
16. Edger PP, Pires JC. 2009. Gene and genome duplications: the impact of dosage-sensitivity on the fate of nuclear genes. Chromosome Res. 17:699-717.
17. Freeling M, Lyons E, Pedersen B, Alam M, Ming R, Lisch D. 2008. Many or most genes in Arabidopsis transposed after the origin of the order Brassicales. Genome Res. 18:1924-1937.
18. Ganko EW, Meyers BC, Vision TJ. 2007. Divergence in expression between duplicated genes in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Evol. 24:2298-2309. (Pubitemid 47574728)
19. Gaut BS. 2001. Patterns of chromosomal duplication in maize and their implications for comparative maps of the grasses. Genome Res. 11:55-66. (Pubitemid 32117953)
20. Gaut BS, Ross-Ibarra J. 2008. Selection on major components of angiosperm genomes. Science 320:484-486. (Pubitemid 351590630)
21. Gout JF, Kahn D, Duret L. 2010. The relationship among gene expression, the evolution of gene dosage, and the rate of protein evolution. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000944.
22. Gu X. 2003. Evolution of duplicate genes versus genetic robustness against null mutations. Trends Genet. 19:354-356. (Pubitemid 36794533)
23. Gu Z, Cavalcanti A, Chen FC, Bouman P, Li WH. 2002. Extent of gene duplication in the genomes of Drosophila, nematode, and yeast. Mol Biol Evol. 19:256-262. (Pubitemid 34184598)
24. Hanada K, Kuromori T, Myouga F, Toyoda T, Li WH, Shinozaki K. 2009. Evolutionary persistence of functional compensation by duplicate genes in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol Evol. 1:409-414.
25. Hirsh AE, Fraser HB. 2001. Protein dispensability and rate of evolution. Nature 411:1046-1049.
26. Hu TT, Pattyn P, Bakker EG, et al. (30 co-authors). 2011. The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change. Nat Genet. (in press).
27. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graphical Stat. 5:299-314.
28. Ikemura T. 1985. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 2:13-34. (Pubitemid 15152046)
29. Jaillon O, Aury JM, Noel B, et al. (56 co-authors). 2007. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449:463-467. (Pubitemid 47509545)
30. Jolliffe IT. 2002. Principal component analysis. New York: Springer.
31. Jordan IK, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. 2004. Duplicated genes evolve slower than singletons despite the initial rate increase. BMC Evol Biol. 4:22.
32. Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, Walichiewicz J. 2005. Repbase update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res. 110:462-467. (Pubitemid 41159923)
33. Larracuente AM, Sackton TB, Greenberg AJ, Wong A, Singh ND, Sturgill D, Zhang Y, Oliver B, Clark AG. 2008. Evolution of protein-coding genes in Drosophila. Trends Genet. 24:114-123.
34. Lemos B, Bettencourt BR, Meiklejohn CD, Hartl DL. 2005. Evolution of proteins and gene expression levels are coupled in Drosophila and are independently associated with mRNA abundance, protein length, and number of protein-protein interactions. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1345-1354. (Pubitemid 40577773)
35. Lercher MJ, Williams EJ, Hurst, LD. 2001. Local similarity in evolutionary rates extends over whole chromosomes in human-rodent and mouse-rat comparisons: implications for understanding the mechanistic basis of the male mutation bias. Mol Biol Evol. 18:2023-2029.
36. Liao BY, Zhang J. 2006. Low rates of expression profile divergence in highly expressed genes and tissue-specific genes during mammalian evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 23:1119-1128. (Pubitemid 43781587)
37. Lobkovsky AE, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. 2010. Universal distribution of protein evolution rates as a consequence of protein folding physics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:2983-2988.
38. Lockton S, Gaut BS. 2005. Plant conserved non-coding sequences and paralogue evolution. Trends Genet. 21:60-65. (Pubitemid 40178851)
39. Maere S, De Bodt S, Raes J, Casneuf T, Van Montagu M, Kuiper M, Van de Peer Y. 2005. Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102:5454-5459. (Pubitemid 40530279)
40. Makalowski W, Boguski MS. 1998. Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution distances are correlated in mouse and rat genes. J Mol Evol. 47:119-121. (Pubitemid 28373201)
41. Marais G, Duret L. 2001. Synonymous codon usage, accuracy of translation, and gene length in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Evol. 52:275-280.
42. Meyers BC, Tej SS, Vu TH, Haudenschild CD, Agrawal V, Edberg SB, Ghazal H, Decola S. 2004. The use of MPSS for whole-genome transcriptional analysis in Arabidopsis. Genome Res. 14:1641-1653. (Pubitemid 39193415)
43. Nembaware V, Crum K, Kelso J, Seoighe C. 2002. Impact of the presence of paralogs on sequence divergence in a set of mousehuman orthologs. Genome Res. 12:1370-1376.
44. Pál C, Papp B, Hurst LD. 2001a. Does the recombination rate affect the efficiency of purifying selection? The yeast genome provides a partial answer. Mol Biol Evol. 18:2323-2326. (Pubitemid 33134362)
45. Pál C, Papp B, Hurst LD. 2001b. Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158:927-931. (Pubitemid 32552328)
46. Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ. 2006. An integrated view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet 7:337-348.
47. Plotkin JB, Fraser HB. 2007. Assessing the determinants of evolutionary rates in the presence of noise. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1113-1121. (Pubitemid 47343649)
48. Prachumwat A, Li WH. 2006. Protein function, connectivity, and duplicability in yeast. Mol Biol Evol. 23:30-39. (Pubitemid 41785950)
49. Rezvoy C, Charif D, Gueguen L, Marais GAB. 2007. MareyMap: an R-based tool with graphical interface for estimating recombination rates. Bioinformatics 23:2188-2189. (Pubitemid 47394123)
50. Rizzon C, Ponger L, Gaut BS. 2006. Striking similarities in the genomic distribution of tandemly arrayed genes in Arabidopsis and rice. PLoS Comput Biol. 2:e115.
51. Rocha EP. 2006. The quest for the universals of protein evolution. Trends Genet. 22:412-416. (Pubitemid 44093768)
52. Rocha EP, Danchin A. 2004. An analysis of determinants of amino acids substitution rates in bacterial proteins. Mol Biol Evol. 21:108-116. (Pubitemid 38233524)
53. Rost B. 1999. Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 12:85-94. (Pubitemid 29103686)
54. Salathe M, Ackermann M, Bonhoeffer S. 2006. The effect of multifunctionality on the rate of evolution in yeast. Mol Biol Evol. 23:721-722.
55. Schmid M, Davison TS, Henz SR, Pape UJ, Demar M, Vingron M, Scholkopf B, Weigel D, Lohmann JU. 2005. A gene expression map of Arabidopsis thaliana development. Nat Genet. 37:501-506. (Pubitemid 40617278)
56. Schranz ME, Mitchell-Olds T. 2006. Independent ancient polyploidy events in the sister families Brassicaceae and Cleomaceae. Plant Cell. 18:1152-1165. (Pubitemid 43956122)
57. Sharp PM, Li WH. 1987. The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. Mol Biol Evol. 4:222-230. (Pubitemid 17116760)
58. Simillion C, Vandepoele K, Van Montagu MC, Zabeau M, Van de Peer Y. 2002. The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 99:13627-13632. (Pubitemid 35215431)
59. Singer T, Fan Y, Chang HS, Zhu T, Hazen SP, Briggs SP. 2006. A high-resolution map of Arabidopsis recombinant inbred lines by whole-genome exon array hybridization. PLoS Genet. 2(9):e144.
60. Smith NG, Hurst LD. 1999. The effect of tandem substitutions on the correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous rates in rodents. Genetics 153:1395-1402. (Pubitemid 29522150)
61. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2009. The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 60:561-588.
62. Subramanian S, Kumar S. 2004. Gene expression intensity shapes evolutionary rates of the proteins encoded by the vertebrate genome. Genetics. 168:373-381. (Pubitemid 39346602)
63. Tiffin P, Hahn MW. 2002. Coding sequence divergence between two closely related plant species: Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis. J Mol Evol. 54:746-753. (Pubitemid 34553640)
64. Urrutia AO, Hurst LD. 2001. Codon usage bias covaries with expression breadth and the rate of synonymous evolution in humans, but this is not evidence for selection. Genetics 159:1191-1199. (Pubitemid 34033460)
65. Vision TJ, Brown DG, Tanksley SD. 2000. The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science 290:2114-2117. (Pubitemid 32001585)
66. Wall DP, Hirsh AE, Fraser HB, Kumm J, Giaever G, Eisen MB, Feldman MW. 2005. Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102:5483-5488. (Pubitemid 40530284)
67. Wang Y, Diehl A, Wu F, Vrebalov J, Giovannoni J, Siepel A, Tanksley SD. 2008. Sequencing and comparative analysis of a conserved syntenic segment in the Solanaceae. Genetics 180:391-408.
68. Warren AS, Anandakrishnan R, Zhang L. 2010. Functional bias in molecular evolution rate of Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Evol Biol. 10:125.
69. Wright SI, Yau CB, Looseley M, Meyers BC. 2004. Effects of gene expression on molecular evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis lyrata. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1719-1726. (Pubitemid 39096888)
70. Yanai I, Benjamin H, Shmoish M, et al. (12 co-authors). 2005. Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification. Bioinformatics. 21:650-659. (Pubitemid 40424791)
71. Yang J, Gu Z, Li WH. 2003. Rate of protein evolution versus fitness effect of gene deletion. Mol Biol Evol. 20:772-774. (Pubitemid 36539013)
72. Yang L, Takuno S, Waters ER, Gaut BS. 2011. Lowly-expressed genes in Arabidopsis thaliana bear the signature of possible pseudogenization by promoter degradation. Mol Biol Evol. 28:1193-1203.
73. Yang Z. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci. 13:555-556. (Pubitemid 27480216)
74. Zeldovich KB, Chen P, Shakhnovich EI. 2007. Protein stability imposes limits on organism complexity and speed of molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:16152-16157. (Pubitemid 350099377)
75. Zhang LQ, Li WH. 2004. Mammalian housekeeping genes evolve more slowly than tissue-specific genes. Mol Biol Evol. 21:236-239.
76. Zhang LQ, Vision TJ, Gaut BS. 2002. Patterns of nucleotide substitution among simultaneously duplicated gene pairs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol. 19:1464-1473. (Pubitemid 36752771)
77. Zuckerkandl E. 1976. Evolutionary processes and evolutionary noise at the molecular level. I. Functional density in proteins. J Mol Evol. 7:167-183.