Developments in conjoint analysis

International Series in Operations Research and Management Science

Volumn 121, Issue , 2008, Pages 23-53

  Rao, Vithala R ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863573287     PISSN: 08848289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-78213-3_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Alba, J.W., A.D.J. Cooke. 2004., When Absence Begets Inference in Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(November) 382–387.
2. Allenby, G.M., N. Arora, J. L. Ginter. 1995. Incorporating Prior Knowledge into the Analysis Of Conjoint Studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(May) 152–162.
3. Allenby, G.M., P.J. Lenk. 1994. Modeling Household Purchase Behavior with Logistic Normal Regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(December) 1218–1231.
4. Andrews, R.L., A. Ansari, I. Currim. 2002a, Hierarchical Bayes Versus Finite Mixture Conjoint Analysis Models: A Comparison Of Fit, Prediction, And Partworth Recovery. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(February) 87–98.
5. Andrews, R.L., A. Ainslie, I. Currim. 2002b, An Empirical Comparison Of Logit Choice Models with Discrete Versus Continuous Representations of Heterogeneity. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(November) 479–487.
6. Bass, F. 1969. A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables. Management Science, 15(January), 215–227.
7. Becker, G.M., M.H. DeGroot, J. Marschak.1964. Measuring Utility By A Single-Response Sequential Method. Behavioral Science 9(July), 226–32.
8. Bodapati, A. 2006. Personal communication.
9. Bradlow, E.T. 2005. Current Issues and a ‘wish list’ for Conjoint Analysis. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 21, 319–323.
10. Bradlow, E.T., V.R. Rao. 2000. A Hierarchical Bayes Model For Assortment Choice. Journal of Marketing Research 37(May), 259–268.
11. Bradlow, E., Y. Hu, T.-H. Ho. 2004., A Learning-Based Model Fro Imputing Missing Levels in Partial Conjoint Profiles. Journal of Marketing Research 41(November), 369–381.
12. Burgess, C.J.C. 1998.ATutorial On Support Vector Machines For Pattern Recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2 121–167.
13. Burgess, L., D. Street. 2003. Optimal Designs for 2_k Choice Experiments. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 32 (11) 2185–2206.
14. Burgess, L., D. Street. 2005. Optimal Designs for Choice Experiments with Asymmetric Attributes. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 134 288–301.
15. Carroll, J.D., P.E. Green. 1995. Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part I, Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 32(November) 385–391.
16. Chung, J., V.R. Rao. 2003. A General Choice Model for Bundles with Multiple Category Products: Application To Market Segmentation and Optimal Pricing for Bundles. Journal of Marketing Research 40(May) 115–130.
17. Corstjens, M., D.A. Gautschi. 1983. Formal Choice Models in Marketing. Marketing Science, 2(1), 19–56.
18. DeSarbo, W.S., V.R. Rao. 1986. A Constrained Unfolding Methodology For Product Positioning. Marketing Science 5(1) 1–19.
19. DeSarbo, W.S., W.M. Vriens, V. Ramaswamy. 1992. Latent Class Metric Conjoint Analysis. Marketing Letters 3(3) 273–288.
20. Ding, M.. 2007. An Incentive-Aligned Mechanism For Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 44(May) 214–223.
21. Ding, M., R. Agarwal, J. Liechty. 2005. Incentive-Aligned Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 42(February) 67–82.
22. Evgeniou, T., C. Boussios, G. Zacharia. 2005. Generalized Robust Conjoint Estimation. Marketing Science 24(3) 415–429.
23. Farquhar, P.H.. V.R. Rao. 1976.ABalance Model For Evaluating Subsets of Multiattributed Items. Management Science 22(January) 528–539.
24. Gilbride, T.J., G.M. Allenby. 2004. A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules. Marketing Science 23(2) 391–406.
25. Ghose, S., V.R. Rao. 2007. A Choice Model of Bundles Features and Meta-Attributes: An Application to Product Design. Working paper, Cornell University.
26. Green, P.E. 1984. A Hybrid Models For Conjoint Analysis: An Expository View. Journal of Marketing Research 21(May) 33-41.
27. Green, P.E., V.R. Rao. 1971. Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental Data. Journal of Marketing Research 8(August) 355–363.
28. Green, P.E., V. Srinivasan. 1978. Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook. Journal of Consumer Research 5(September) 103–123.
29. Green, P.E., V. Srinivasan. 1990. Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Marketing 54(October) 3–19.
30. Green, P. E., A. M. Krieger, M. K. Agarwal. 1991. Adaptive Conjoint Analysis: Some Caveats and Suggestions. Journal of Marketing Research 28(May) 215–222.
31. Green, P.E., A. Krieger, T.G. Vavra. 1997. Evaluating New Products. Marketing Research 9(4) 12–19.
32. Green, P.E., A. Krieger, Y. Wind. 2003. Buyer choice Simulators, Optimizers, and Dynamic Models.
33. Wind Y., Paul E. Green, Marketing Research and Modeling: Progress and Prospects: A Tribute to Paul E. Green. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
34. Green, P.E., Y. Wind, A.K. Jain. 1972. Preference Measurement of Item Collections. Journal of Marketing Research 9(November) 371–377.
35. Hauser, J.R., V.R. Rao. 2003. Conjoint Analysis, Related Modeling, and Applications. Wind, Y., P.E. Green, Marketing Research and Modeling: Progress and Prospects: A Tribute to Paul E. Green, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
36. Hauser, J.R., O. Toubia. 2005. The Impact of Utility Balance and Endogeneity in Conjoint Analysis. Marketing Science, 24(3) 498–507.
37. Huber, J., K. Train. 2001. On the Similarity of Classical and Bayesian Estimates of Individual Mean Partworths. Marketing Letters 12(3) 259–269.
38. Huber, J., K. Zwerina. 1996. On the Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Designs. Journal of Marketing Research,33(August), 307–317.
39. Jedidi, K., Z.J. Zhang. 2002. Augmenting Conjoint Analysis to Estimate Consumer Reservation Price. Management Science, 48(10), 1350–1368.
40. Jedidi, K., S. Jagpal, P. Manchanda. 2003. Measuring Heterogeneous Reservation Prices for Product Bundles. Marketing Science 22(1), 107–130.
41. Johnson, R.M. 1987. Adaptive Conjoint Analysis. Sawtooth Software Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing. Sawtooth Software, Inc., Ketchum, ID, 253–265.
42. Johnson, R.M. 1991 Comment on ‘‘Adaptive Conjoint Analysis’’: Some Caveats and Suggestions. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(May), 223–225.
43. Kanninen, B.J. 2002. Optimal Designs For Multinomial Choice Designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(May), 214–227.
44. Kuhfeld, W.F. 2005. Marketing Research Methods in SAS. Experimental Design, Choice, Conjoint, and Graphical Techniques. SAS 9.1 Edition, TS-722, SAS Institute Inc., Cary,NC
45. Kuhfeld, W.F., R.D. Tobias, and M. Garratt. 1994. Efficient Experimental Designs with Marketing Research Applications. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(November), 545–557.
46. Lenk, P.J., W.S. DeSarbo, P.E. Green and M.R. Young. 1996. Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Recovery of Partworth Heterogeneity from Reduced Experimental Designs. Marketing Science 15(2), 173–191.
47. Liechty, J., V. Ramaswamy, S. H. Cohen. 2001. Choice Menus for Mass Customization: An Experimental Approach for Analyzing Customer Demand with an Application to a Web-Based Information Service. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 183–196.
48. Liechty, J.C., D.K.H. Fong and W.S. DeSarbo. 2005. Dynamic Models Incorporating Individual Heterogeneity: Utility Evolution in Conjoint Analysis. Marketing Science 24(2), 285–293.
49. Liu, Q., T. Otter, and G.M. Allenby. 2007. Investigating Endogeneity Bias in Marketing. Marketing Science, 26(5), 642–650.
50. Oded N., V. Srinivasan. 2007. Adaptive-Self Explication of Multi-Attribute Preferences. Working Paper, Stanford, CA: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University
51. Ofek, E. and V. Srinivasan. 2002. How Much Does the Market Value an Improvement in a Product Attribute?. Marketing Science 22(3) 398–411.
52. Orme, B. (2006) Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. Research Publishers LLC, Madison, WI.
53. Park, Y.-H., M. Ding, V.R. Rao. Forthcoming. Eliciting Preference for Complex Products: A Web-Based Upgrading Method. Journal of Marketing Research.
54. Rao, V.R. 1976. Conjoint Measurement in Marketing Analysis. Sheth, J.N. Multivariate Methods for Market and Survey Research, American Marketing Association.
55. Rao, V.R., H. Sattler. 2003. Measurement of Price Effects with Conjoint Analysis: Separating Informational and Allocative Effects of Price. Gustafsson, A., A. Herrmann, F. Huber, Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications, 3rd edition, Springer, Berlin
56. Rossi, P.E., G.M. Allenby, R. McCulloch. 2005. Bayesian Statistics and Marketing, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, England.
57. Sandor, Z., M. Wedel. 2001. Designing Conjoint Choice Experiments using Managers’ Beliefs. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(November) 430–444.
58. Sandor, Z., M. Wedel. 2002. Profile Construction in Experimental Choice Designs for Mixed Logit Models. Marketing Science, 21(4) 455–475.
59. Srinivasan, V., C.S. Park. 1997. Surprising Robustness of Self-Explicated Approach to Customer Preference Structure Measurement. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2) 286–291.
60. Street, D.J., L. Burgess. 2004. Optimal and Near-Optimal Pairs for the Estimation of Effects in 2-Level Choice Experiments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 118, 185–199.
61. Street, D.S., and L. Burgess. 2007. The Construction of Optimal Stated Choice Experiments: Theory and Methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience, A John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Publication.
62. Street, D.J., L. Burgess, J.J. Louviere. 2005. Quick and Easy Choice Sets: Constructing Optimal and nearly Optimal Stated Choice Experiments. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22 459–470.
63. Su, M., V.R. Rao. 2006. A Continuous Conjoint Analysis for Preannounced New products with Evolutional Attributes. Working Paper, Johnson School, Cornell University.
64. Toubia, O., J.R. Hauser. 2007. On Managerially Efficient Experimental Designs. Marketing Science. 26(6), 850–858.
65. Toubia, O., J.R. Hauser, D.I. Simester. 2004., Polyhedral Methods for Adaptive Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(February) 116–131.
66. Toubia, O., D.I. Simester, J.R. Hauser, E. Dahan. 2003. Fast Polyhedral Adaptive Conjoint Estimation. Marketing Science, 22(3), 273–303.
67. Urban, G.L. and J.R. Hauser. 2002. ‘Listening in’ to find consumer needs and solutions, Working Paper, Cambridge, MA: Center for Innovation in Product Development, MIT (February).
68. Vadali, S., J. Liechty, A. Rangaswamy. 2006. Generalized Hierarchical Bayes Estimation for Polyhedral Conjoint Analysis. Working Paper, Penn State University.
69. Wertenbroch, K., B. Skiera. 2002. Measuring Consumers’ Willingness to Pay at the Point of Purchase. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(May) 228–241.
70. Wind, Y, P.E. Green, D. Shifflet, and M. Scarbrough. 1989. Courtyard by Marriott: Designing a Hotel with Consumer-based marketing. Interfaces, 19(January–February) 25–47.
71. Wittink, D.R., P. Cattin. 1989. Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update. Journal of Marketing. 53(July), 91–96.
72. Wittink, D.R., S.K. Keil. 2003. Continuous Conjoint Analysis. Gustafsson, A., A. Herrmann, F. Huber. Conjoint Measurement Methods and Applications,. 3rd Edition, Springer, New York.
73. Wittink, D.R., M. Vriens, W. Burhenne. 1994. Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis in Europe: Results and Critical Reflections. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11 41–52.
74. Yee, M., E. Dahan, J.R. Hauser, J. Orlin. 2005. Greedoid-Based Noncompensatory Inference. Marketing Science 26 532–549.