Writing-to-learn in undergraduate science education: A community-based, conceptually driven approach

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 17-25

  Reynolds, Julie A ^a   Thaiss, Christopher ^b   Katkin, Wendy ^c   Thompson, Robert J ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863422042     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.11-08-0064     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Alaimo P, Langenhan J, Nichols L (2009). Eliminating lab reports: a rhetorical approach for teaching the scientific paper in sophomore organic chemistry. WAC J 20, 17-32.
2. Allie S, Demaree D, Taylor J, Lubben F, Buffler A (2008). Making sense of measurements, making sense of the textbook. In: 2008 Physics Education Research Conference, vol. 1064, eds. M. Henderson, M. Sabella, and L. Hsu, 3-6.
3. Armstrong NA, Wallace CS, Chang SM (2008). Learning fromwriting in college biology. Res Sci Educ 38, 483-499.
4. Bangert-Drowns RL, Hurley MM, Wilkinson B (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 74, 29-58.
5. Barr TH (1995). Integrating mathematical ideas through reading, writing, and speaking: a senior seminar in mathematics and computer science. PRIMUS 5(1), 43-54.
6. Bean J, Weimer M (2011). Engaging Ideas: The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
7. Bereiter C, Scardamalia M (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Berry FC, Carlson PA (2010). Assessing engineering design experiences using calibrated peer review. Int J Eng Educ 26(6).
9. Beyer CH, Gillmore G, Fisher AT (2007). Inside the Undergraduate Experience: The University of Washington's Study of Undergraduate Learning, Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
10. Blakemore S-J, Chowdhury S (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47, 296-312.
11. Blakeslee A. (1997). Activity, context, interaction, and authority: learning to write scientific papers in situ. J Business Tech Commun 11, 125-169.
12. Bommaraju S (2004). Effective writing assignments to enhance student learning in "Introduction to Circuit Analysis. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.
13. Bradley DB (2001).Developing research questions through grant proposal development. Educ Gerontol 27, 569-581.
14. Bressette AR, Breton GW (2001). Using writing to enhance the undergraduate research experience. J Chem Educ 78(12), 1626-1627.
15. Brewster C, Klump J (2004).At the classroom level: writing in the disciplines and writing to learn, In: Writing to Learn, Learning toWrite: Revisiting Writing across the Curriculum in Northwest Secondary Schools, Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 19-23.
16. Brod R, Gomber J, Mendoza J, Roginski J, Smith T (2010). Modeling a day in the life of a diabetic. PRIMUS 20(3), 261-273.
17. Burke KA, Greenbowe TJ, Hand BM (2006). Implementing the science writing heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. J Chem Educ 83(7), 1032-1038.
18. Carter M, Ferzli M, Wiebe EN (2007). Writing to learn by learning to write in the disciplines. J Bus Tech Commun 21, 278-302.
19. Clase KL, Gundlach E, Pelaez NJ (2010). Calibrated peer review for computer-assisted learning of biological research competencies. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 38(5), 290-295.
20. Codespoti DJ (1994). The capstone of the C.S. Major. In: Recreating the Revolution. Proceedings of the 15thAnnual National Educational Computing Conference (Boston, MA, June 13-15, 1994).
21. Cooper MM (1993).Writing: an approach for large-enrollment chemistry courses. J Chem Educ 70, 476-477.
22. Coppola BP, Daniels DS (1996). The role of written and verbal expression in improving communication skills in an undergraduate chemistry program. Language Learning across Disciplines 1, 67-86.
23. Craig JL, Lerner N, Poe M (2008). Innovation across the curriculum: Three case studies in teaching science and engineering communication. IEEE Trans Professional Commun 51(3), 280-301.
24. Cummings K, Murphy M (2007). The effectiveness of incorporating conceptual writing assignments into physics instruction. In: 2006 Physics Education Research Conference, vol. 883, eds. L. McCullough, L. Hsu, and P. Heron, 61-64.
25. Dahm K, Newell J, Harvey R (2006). Developing metacognitive engineering teams through targeted writing exercises and studying learning preferences. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL.
26. Dahm K, Newell J, Newell H, Harvey R (2009). The impact of structured writing and developing awareness of learning preferences on the performance and attitudes of engineering teams. Adv Eng Educ 1(4), 1-17.
27. Dannels D. P (2000). Learning to be professional: technical classroom discourse, practice, and professional identity construction. J Business Tech Commun 14(1), 5-37.
28. Elbow P, Belanoff P (1999). Sharing and Responding, New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Ferris D (2003). Response to StudentWriting: Implications for Second Language Students, New York: Routledge.
30. Fleron JF, Hotchkiss PK (2001). First-year and senior seminars: Dual seminars = stronger mathematics majors. PRIMUS 11(4), 289-324.
31. Forbes DC, Davis PM (2008). Forging faculty-student relationships at the college level using a first-year research experience. J Chem Educ 85(12), 1696-1698.
32. Ganguli AB (1994). Writing to learn mathematics: enhancement of mathematical understanding. AMATYC Rev 16, 45-51.
33. Garvey A (2010).Writing in an upper-level cs course. Proceedings of the 41st ACMTechnical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 209-213.
34. Gerdeman RD, Russell AA, Worden KJ (2007). Web-based student writing and reviewing in a large biology lecture course. J Coll Sci Teach 36(5), 46-52.
35. Goldberg, F, Bendall S (1995). Making the invisible visible- a teaching/ learning environment that builds on a new view of the physics learner. Am J Phys 63(11), 978-991.
36. Graham S, Perin D (2007). Writing next: effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools, Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
37. Guisasola J, Ceberio M, Zubimendi JL (2006). University students' strategies for constructing hypothesis when tackling paper-and-pencil tasks in physics. Res Sci Educ 36(3), 163-186.
38. Handelsman J, et al. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science 304, 521-522.
39. Hanson JH, Williams JM (2008). Using writing assignments to improve self-assessment and communication skills in an engineering statics course. J Eng Educ 97, 515-529.
40. Hecker PA (1997). Successful consulting engineering: a lifetime of learning. J Manage Eng 13(6), 62-65.
41. House R, Watt A, Williams JM (2007). Mapping the Future of Engineering Communication: Report on a Research Study of Engineering Faculty and Their Teaching of Writing as a Function of the ABET/EAC Criteria. Paper presented at the International Professional Communication Conference, Seattle,WA.
42. Jang SJ (2007). A study of students' construction of science knowledge: talk and writing in a collaborative group. Educ Res 49(1), 65-81.
43. Kelly GJ, Chen C, Prothero W (2000). The epistemological framing of a discipline: writing science in university oceanography. J Res Sci Teach 37, 691-718.
44. Kelly GJ, Takao A (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: an analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing. Sci Educ 86, 314-342.
45. Kim SH, Wise J, Hillsley M (2005). Learning technical writing skills through peer review: use of calibrated peer reviewTM, in unit operation lab. Paper presented at the AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings.
46. Kirsch G, Sullivan P (1992). Methods and Methodology in Composition Research, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
47. Klein PD (2004). Constructing scientific explanations through writing. Instruct Sci 32(3), 191-231.
48. Kovac J, Sherwood DW (2001).Writing across the chemistry curriculum: an instructor's manual, Prentice Hall.
49. Kuhn D (1999).Adevelopmentalmodel of critical thinking. Educ Res 28, 16-26.
50. Kuhn D (2005). Education for Thinking, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Lave J, Wenger E (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Lerch C, Bilics A, Colley B (2006).Using Reflection toDevelop Higher Order Processes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 2006.
53. Lerner N (2007). Laboratory lessons for writing and science. Writ Commun 24, 191-222.
54. Lillig JW (2008). Writing across the semester: a non-standard term paper that encourages critical data analysis in the upper-division chemistry classroom. J Chem Educ 85, 1392-1394.
55. MacKay MB, Emerson L, Funnell KA, MacKay BR (2005). Journal writing as a tool for learning in landscape management and horticultural science. In: IVth International Symposium on Horticultural Education, Extension and Training-Proceedings, eds. Z. Singh, P. J. Batt, R. MurrayPrior, 233-239.
56. Margerum LD, Gulsrud M, Manlapez R, Rebong R, Love A (2007). Application of calibrated peer review (CPR) writing assignments to enhance experiments with an environmental chemistry focus. J Chem Educ 84(2), 292-295.
57. May CL, Locke JR, Coppola BP, McNeil AJ (2010). Improving science education and understanding through editing wikipedia. J Chem Educ 87, 1159-1162.
58. Mayer RE (1992). Cognition and instruction: their historic meeting within educational psychology. J Educ Psychol 84, 405-412.
59. McClure C (2009). Introducing scientific writing to students early in their academic careers. J Coll Sci Teach 38, 20-23.
60. Meyer JHF, Land R (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Educ 49, 373-388.
61. Mirel B, Olsen LA (1998). Social and cognitive effects of professional communication on software usability. Tech Commun Quarterly 7(2), 197-221.
62. Moskovitz C, Kellogg D (2011). Inquiry-based writing in the laboratory course. Science 332, 919-920.
63. National Research Council (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
64. National Survey of Student Engagement (2008). Promoting Engagement for All Students: The Imperative to Look Within. http://nsse.iub.edu/NSSE_2008_Results/docs/withhold/NSSE2008_Results_revised_11-14-2008.pdf (accessed 20 March 2009).
65. Nekvasil NP (1998). Using round table labs to complement didactic lectures and experimental labs. Adv Physiol Educ 19(1) S68-S73.
66. Newcomer J, Kitto K, Sylvester B (2003). Written communication in a technical context: meaningful writing assignments for engineering technology students. Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO.
67. Ostheimer MW, White EM (2005). Portfolio assessment in an American engineering college. Assessing Writing 10(1), 61-73.
68. Pelaez NJ (2002). Problem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 26(3), 174-184.
69. Poirrier GP (1997). Writing-to-Learn: Curricular Strategies for Nursing and Other Disciplines, New York: National League of Nursing Press.
70. Poock JR, Burke KA, Greenbowe TJ, Hand BM (2007). Using the science writing heuristic in the general chemistry laboratory to improve students' academic performance. J Chem Educ 84(8), 1371-1379.
71. Poronnik P, Moni RW (2006). The opinion editorial: teaching physiology outside the box. Adv Physiol Educ 30(2), 73-82.
72. Ranelli PL, Nelson JV (1998). Assessing writing perceptions and practices of pharmacy students. Am J Pharmaceut Educ 62(4), 426-432.
73. Reilly JT, Strickland M (2010). A writing and ethics component for a quantum mechanics, physical chemistry course. J Coll Sci Teach 39, 35-41.
74. Reynolds JA, Thompson RJ Jr. (2011). Want to improve undergraduate thesis writing? Engage students and their faculty readers in scientific peer review CBE Life Sci Educ 10, 209-215.
75. Ridgway D, Young V (2005). Applying a writing-to-learn strategy in a traditional material science and engineering course. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR.
76. Rivard LP (1994). A review of writing to learn in science- implications for practice and research. J Res Sci Teach 31, 969-983.
77. Robinson MS (2008). Using the ACS journals search to validate assumptions about writing in chemistry and improve chemistry writing instruction. J Chem Educ 85(5), 650-654.
78. Robinson MS, Stoller FL (2008). Write like a chemist, New York: Oxford University Press.
79. Rosenthal LC (1987).Writing across the chemistry curriculum: chemistry lab reports. J Chem Educ 64, 996.
80. Rudd J A III, Wang VZ, Cervato Cl, Ridkey R (2009). Calibrated peer review™ assignments for the earth sciences. J Geosci Educ 57, 324-4328.
81. Russell A (2005). Calibrated Peer Review™: a writing and criticalthinking instructional tool. In: Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education, Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 67-71.
82. Ryan MR, Campa H (2000). Application of learner-based teaching innovations to enhance education in wildlife conservation. Wildlife Soc Bull 28(1), 168-179.
83. Schell E, Rawson, KJ (2010). Rhetorica in Motion: Feminist Rhetorical Methods and Methodologies, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
84. Schepmann HG, Hughes LA (2006). Chemical research writing: a preparatory course for student capstone research. J Chem Educ 83(7), 1024-1028.
85. Schoenfeld AH (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: challenges of educational theory and practice. Educ Res 28, 4-14.
86. Schraw G, Crippen KJ, Hartley K (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Res Sci Educ 36, 111-139.
87. Scoles K, Millan H (2005). Bringing writing into the ECE laboratory. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR.
88. Shah J, Shah A, Pietrobon R (2009). Scientific writing of novice researchers: what difficulties and encouragements do they encounter? Acad Med 84, 511-516.
89. Shibley IA, Milakofksy LM, Nicotera CL (2001). Incorporating a substantial writing assignment into organic chemistry: library research, peer review, and assessment. J Chem Educ 78, 50-53.
90. Sivey JD, Lee CM (2008). Using popular magazine articles to teach the art of writing for nontechnical audiences. J Chem Educ 85, 55-58.
91. Spear K (1987). Sharing Writing, Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/ Cook/Heinemann.
92. Stewart J, Ballard S (2010). Effect of written presentation on performance in introductory physics. Phys Rev Special Topics-Phys Educ Res 6(2).
93. Stoller FL, Horn B, Grabe W, Robinson MS (2005). Creating and validating assessment instruments for a discipline-specific writing course: an interdisciplinary approach. J Appl Linguistics 2, 75-104.
94. Thaiss C (1998). The Harcourt Brace Guide to Writing across the Curriculum, FortWorth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
95. Thaiss C, Zawacki T (2006). Engaged Writers and Dynamic Disciplines: Research on the Academic Writing Life, Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook/Heinemann.
96. Thompson N, Alford E, Liao C, Johnson R, Matthews M (2005). Integrating undergraduate research into engineering: a communications approach to holistic education. J Eng Educ 94, 297-308.
97. Tilstra L (2001). Using journal articles to teach writing skills for laboratory reports in general chemistry. J Chem Educ 78(6), 762-764.
98. Troy J, Hirsch P, Smith H, Yalvac B (2004). Team-based written communication exercises for biomedical engineering juniors: where to do it and what works. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.
99. Van Maanen J (1988). Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
100. Volz T, Saterbak A (2009). Students' strengths and weaknesses in evaluating technical arguments as revealed through implementing Calibrated Peer ReviewTM in a bioengineering laboratory. http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/technologies/volz_saterbak.cfm (accessed 3 October 2011).
101. Wallner AS, Latosi-Sawin E (1999). Technical writing and communication in a senior-level chemistry seminar. J Chem Educ 76(10), 1404-1406.
102. Walvoord ME, Hoefnagels MH, Gaffin DD, Chumchai MM, Long DA (2008). An analysis of calibrated peer review (CPR) in a science lecture classroom. J Coll Sci Teach 38, 66-72.
103. Weinstein CE, Mayer RE (1985). The teaching of learning strategies, In: Handbook of Research on Teaching, ed.M.C.Wittrock, New York: Macmillan, 315-327.
104. Whelan RJ, Zare RN (2003). Teaching effective communication in a writing-intensive analytical chemistry course. J Chem Educ 80(8), 904-906.
105. Wojahn P, Dyke J, Riley LA, Hensel E, Brown SC (2001). Blurring boundaries between technical communication and engineering: challenges of a multidisciplinary, client-based pedagogy. Tech Commun Quarterly 10(2), 129-148.
106. Yalvac B, Smith HD, Troy JB, Hirsch P (2007). Promoting advanced writing skills in an upper-level engineering class. J Eng Educ 96(2), 117-128.
107. Yoder J, Sawyers D (2006). Proofreading exercises to improve technical writing in a freshman engineering course. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL.