Assessing engineering design experiences using calibrated peer review™

International Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1503-1507

  Berry, Frederick C ^a   Carlson, Patricia A ^a  

^a ROSE HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Engineering design; Peer review; Technical communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650864064     PISSN: 0949149X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. S. M. Lord, Integrating effective 'Writing to Communicate' experience in engineering courses: Guidelines and examples, International Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 2009, pp. 196-203.
2. O. L. Chapman and M. A. Fiore, Calibrated Peer Review™, Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 12(3), 2000, pp. 11-15.
3. L. Driskill, Linking industry best practices and EC3(g) assessment in engineering communication, Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO, June 18-21, 2000, Session 2261.
4. IEEE Code of Ethics, http://www.ieee.org/web/membership/ethics/code- ethics.html (Accessed 17 July 2010).
5. NCIIA E-Team RFP, http://nciia.org/grants/eteam, (Accessed 17 July 2010).
6. T. Flateby and R. Fehr, Assessing and improving writing in the engineering curriculum, International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(5), 2008, pp. 901-905.
7. J. A. Marin-Garcia and C. Miralles, Oral presentation and assessment skills in engineering education, International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(5), 2008, pp. 926-935.
8. P. Carlson and F. Berry, Using computer-mediated peer review in an engineering design course, IEEE Transactions On Professional Communications, 51(3), 2008, pp. 264-279.
9. Calibrated Peer Review CPR™, http://cpr.molsci.ucla.edu (Accessed 17 July 2010).