Does constructive performance feedback improve citizenship intentions and job satisfaction? The roles of perceived opportunities for advancement, respect, and mood

Human Resource Development Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 177-201

  Sommer, Kristin L ^a   Kulkarni, Mukta ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT BANGALORE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862701401     PISSN: 10448004     EISSN: 15321096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.21132     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Albrecht, T. L., & Adelman, M. B. (1987). Communicating social support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58(1), 67-79.
3. Baron, R.A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 199-207.
4. Baron, R.A. (1990). Countering the effects of destructive criticism: The relative efficacy of four interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 235-245.
5. Baron, R. A. (1993). Criticism (informal negative feedback) as a source of perceived unfairness in organizations: Effects, mechanisms, and countermeasures. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 155-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173-1182.
7. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, & B. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D.L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 676-685.
9. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it's not my fault? Communication Research, 15(4), 381-399.
10. Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2003a). A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a "fair" process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 747-758.
11. Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2003b). What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice. Human Resource Management Review, 13(1), 107-126.
12. Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 445-464.
13. Cameron, K., & Whetten, D. (1998). Developing management skills (4th ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
14. Chory, R. M., & Kingsley-Westerman, C.Y. (2009). Feedback and fairness: The relationship between negative performance feedback and organizational justice. Western Journal of Communication, 73(2), 157-181.
15. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321.
16. Collie, T., Bradley, G., & Sparks, B.A. (2002). Fair process revisited: Differential effects of interactional and procedural justice in the presence of social comparison information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 545-555.
17. Collins, M. H., Hair, J. F., & Rocco, T. S. (2009). The older-worker-younger-supervisor dyad: A test of the reverse Pygmalion effect. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(1), 21-41.
18. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400.
19. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445.
20. Connolly, J. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2000). The role of affectivity in job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(2), 265-281.
21. Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1997). Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance, 10(4), 331.
22. Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 317-372). London, England: Wiley.
23. Dobbins, G. H., Cardy, R. L., & Platz-Vieno, S. J. (1990). A contingency approach to appraisal satisfaction: An initial investigation of the joint effects of organizational variables and appraisal characteristics. Journal of Management, 16(3), 619-632.
24. Fassina, N. E., Jones, D. A., & Uggerslev, K. L. (2008). Meta-analytic tests of relationships between organizational justice and citizenship behavior: Testing agent-system and shared-variance models. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 805-828.
25. Feldman, J. M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal or Applied Psychology, 66(2), 127-148.
26. Fombrun, C. J., & Laud, R. L. (1983). Strategic issues in performance appraisal: Theory and practice. Personnel, 60(6), 23-31.
27. Fried, Y., Levi, A. S., Ben-David, H., & Tiegs, R. B. (1999). Inflation of subordinates' performance ratings: Main and interactive effects of rater negative. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(4), 432-445.
28. Geddes, D., & Linnehan, F. (1996). Exploring the dimensionality of positive and negative performance feedback. Communication Quarterly, 44(3), 326-344.
29. George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 299-307.
30. George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good. A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310-329.
31. Gosselin, A., Werner, J. M., & Halle, N. (1997). Ratee preferences concerning performance management and appraisal. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8(4), 315-333.
32. Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561-568.
33. Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.
35. Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
36. Ilgen, D. R., & Davis, C. A. (2000). Bearing bad news: Reactions to negative performance feedback. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), 550-565.
37. Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluation. Evaluation Review, 5(5), 602-619.
38. Kavanagh, M. J., MacKinney, A. C., & Wolins, L. (1971). Issues in managerial performance: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of ratings. Psychological Bulletin, 75(1), 34-49.
39. Lam, S. S. K., Yik, M. S. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (2002). Responses to formal performance appraisal feedback: The role of negative affectivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 192-201.
40. Lawler, E. E. III. (2011). Creating an effective appraisal system. In K. Oakes & P. Galagan (Eds.), The executive guide to integrated talent management (pp. 79-90). Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
41. LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52-65.
42. Leung, K., Su, S., & Morris, M.W. (2001). When is criticism not constructive? The roles of fairness perceptions and dispositional attributions in employee acceptance of critical supervisory feedback. Human Relations, 54(9), 1155-1187.
43. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum.
44. Loi, R., Yang, J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). Four-factor justice and daily job satisfaction: A multilevel investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 770-781.
45. Masterson, S. S., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738-748.
46. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104.
47. McCarthy, A., & Garavan, T. (2006). Postfeedback development perceptions: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17(3), 245-267.
48. Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845-855.
49. Moorman, R. H., & Byrne, Z. S. (2005). How does organizational justice affect organizational citizenship behavior? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 355-380). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Motowildo, S. J. (1984). Does job satisfaction lead to consideration and personal sensitivity? Academy of Management Journal, 27(4), 910-915.
51. Nelson, D., Basu, R., & Purdie, R. (1998). An examination of exchange quality and work stressors in leader-follower dyads. International Journal of Stress Management, 5(2), 103-112.
52. Nurse, L. (2005). Performance appraisal, employee development and organizational justice: exploring the linkages. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(7), 1176-1194.
53. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
54. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Pettijohn, C. E., Pettijohn, L. S., & d'Amico, M. (2001). Characteristics of performance appraisals and their impact onsales force satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(2), 127-146.
56. Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 262-270.
57. Roberson, L., Galvin, B. M., & Charles, A. (2007). When group identities matter: Bias in performance appraisal. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 617-650.
58. Shapiro, D. L., Buttner, E. H., & Barry, B. (1994). Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(3), 346-368.
59. Sparr, J. L., & Sonnentag, S. (2008). Fairness perceptions of supervisor feedback, LMX, and employee well-being at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(2), 198-225.
60. Sun, L., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 558-577.
61. Taylor, A. F., Pettijohn, L. S., & Pettijohn, C. E. (1999). A descriptive study of topics and perceptions of retail sales performance appraisals. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(3), 271-291.
62. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1990). Interpersonal aspects of procedural justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology in business settings (pp. 77-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Tyler, T., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 913-930.
65. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
66. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegan, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
67. West, M. A., Guthrie, J. P., Dawson, J. F., Borrill, C. S., & Carter, M. (2006). Reducing patient mortality in hospitals: The role of human resource management. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 983-1002.
68. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.
69. Williams, S., & Shiaw, W. T. (1999). Mood and organizational citizenship behavior: The effects of positive affect on employee organizational citizenship behavior intentions. Journal of Psychology, 133(6), 656-668.
70. Youngcourt, S. S., Leiva, P. I., & Jones, R. G. (2007). Perceived purposes of performance appraisal: Correlates of individual- and position-focused purposes on attitudinal outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(3): 315-343.