Hybrid fitting of a hydrosystem model: Long-term insight into the Beauce aquifer functioning (France)

Water Resources Research

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Flipo, N ^a   Monteil, C ^a,b   Poulin, M ^a   De Fouquet, C ^a   Krimissa, M ^b  

^a PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b EDF R AND D   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER RECHARGE; AQUIFER SYSTEMS; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; CALIBRATION PROCESS; DATA SUBSETS; FIRST FIT; FITTING METHOD; HIGHER FREQUENCIES; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; HYDRO-SYSTEM; LINEAR MODEL OF COREGIONALIZATION; LITERATURE REVIEWS; LOW-FREQUENCY SIGNALS; MULTI-PARAMETER OPTIMIZATIONS; PIE- ZOMETRIC HEAD; PROCESS-BASED MODELS; ROOT-MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; STORAGE COEFFICIENT; TRANSMISSIVITY FIELD; UNSATURATED ZONE; WATER BUDGET; WATER FLUX; WATER MASS BALANCES;

INVERSE PROBLEMS; WATER RESOURCES;

AQUIFERS;

AQUIFER CHARACTERIZATION; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; HUMAN ACTIVITY; HYBRID; LONG-TERM CHANGE; PIEZOMETER; RECHARGE; TRANSMISSIVITY; UNCONFINED AQUIFER; VADOSE ZONE; WATER BUDGET; WATER MASS;

BEAUCE [CENTRE]; CENTRE [FRANCE]; FRANCE;

EID: 84862103839     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2011WR011092     Document Type: Review

References (146)

1. Abbott, M., J. Bathurst, J. Cunge, P. O'Connell, and J. Rasmussen (1986a), An introduction to the European Hydrological System. 1. History and philosophy of a physically based distributed modelling system, J. Hydrol., 87, 45-59.
2. Abbott, M., J. Bathurst, J. Cunge, P. O'Connell, and J. Rasmussen (1986b), An introduction to the European Hydrological system. 2. Structure of a physically based distributed modelling system, J. Hydrol., 87, 61-77.
3. Ackerer, P., and F. Delay (2010), Inversion of a set of well-test interferences in a fractured limestone aquifer by using an automatic downscaling parameterization technique, J. Hydrol., 389, 42-56.
4. Ahmed, S., and G. de Marsily (1993), Cokriged estimation of aquifer transmissivity as an indirect solution of the inverse problem: A practical approach, Water Resour. Res., 29(2), 521-530, doi:10.1029/92WR00226.
5. Alcolea, A., J. Carrera, and A. Medina (2006), Pilot points method incorporating prior information for solving the groundwater flow inverse problem, Adv. Water Resour., 29(11), 1678-1689.
6. Anderton, S., J. Latron, and F. Gallart (2002a), Sensitivity analysis and multi-response, multi-criteria evaluation of a physically based distributed model, Hydrol. Processes, 16, 333-353.
7. Anderton, S., J. Latron, S. White, P. Llorens, F. Gallart, C. Salvany, and P. O'Connell (2002b), Internal evaluation of a physically based distributed model using data from a Mediterranean mountain catchment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6(1), 67-83.
8. Ayvaz, M. T., H. Karahan, and M. M. Aral (2007), Aquifer parameter and zone structure estimation using kernel-based fuzzy c-means clustering and genetic algorithm, J. Hydrol., 343, 240-253.
9. Beven, K. (1989), Changing ideas in hydrology. The case of physicallybased model, J. Hydrol., 105, 157-172.
10. Beven, K. (2006), On undermining science?, Hydrol. Processes, 20, 3141-3146.
11. Boesten, J. (2000), Modeller subjectivity in estimating pesticide parameters for leaching models using the same laboratory data set, Agric. Water Manage., 44(1-3), 389-409.
12. Bonnet, M., S. Floriat, and L. Demongodin (2004), Reprise du modèle de gestion de la nappe de Beauce. Phase 1-Calage en régime permanent et transitoire, Tech. Rep. RPP04M026b, 169 pp., Agence de l'Eau Loire Bretagne, Orléans, France.
13. Boukerma, B. (1987), Modélisation des écoulements superficiels et souterrains dans le sud-ouest de la France: Approche du bilan hydrique, PhD thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, Paris.
14. Boyle, D., Gupta, and S. H. V. Sorooshian (2000), Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods, Water Resour. Res., 36(12), 3663-3674.
15. Capilla, J., J. Gomez-Hernandez, and A. Sahuquillo (1997), Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data 2. Demonstration on a synthetic aquifer, J. Hydrol., 203, 175-188.
16. Carrera, J., and S. Neuman (1986), Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 3. Application to synthetic and field data, Water Resour. Res., 22(2), 228-242.
17. Carrera, J., A. Alcolea, A. Medina, J. Hidalgo, and L. J. Slooten (2005), Inverse problem in hydrogeology, Hydrogeol. J., 13:20622.
18. Cooley, R. (1985), A comparison of several methods of solving nonlinear regression groundwater flow problems, Water Resour. Res., 21(10), 1525-1538.
19. Cooley, R. L., and M. Hill (2000), Comment on RamaRao et al. [1995] and LaVenue et al. [1995], Water Resour. Res., 36(9), 2795-2797, doi:10.1029/2000WR900174.
20. Cooley, R., L. Konikow, and R. Naff (1986), Nonlinear-regression groundwater flow modeling of a deep regional aquifer system, Water Resour. Res., 22(13), 1759-1778.
21. Dagan, G. (1985), Stochastic modeling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities: The inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 21(1), 65-72.
22. David, C. H., F. Habets, D. R. Maidment, and Z.-L. Yang (2011), RAPID applied to the SIM-France model, Hydrol. Processes, 25(22), 3412-3425, doi:10.1002/hyp.8070.
23. de Fouquet, C., D. Gallois, and G. Perron (2007), Geostatistical characterization of the nitrogen dioxyde concentration in an urban area. Part I : spatial variability and cartography of the annual concentration, Atmos. Environ., 41(32), 6701-6714.
24. de Fouquet, C., L. Malherbe, and A. Ung (2011), Geostatistical analysis of the temporal variability of ozone concentrations. comparison between CHIMERE model and surface observations, Atmos. Environ., 45(20), 3434-3446.
25. Delfs, J., C. Park, and O. Kolditz (2009), A sensitivity analysis of hortonian flow, Adv. Water Resour., 32(9), 1386-1395, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres. 2009.06.005.
26. de Marsily, G. (1978), De l'identification des systèmes hydrogéologiques, PhD thesis, Univ. Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI, Paris.
27. de Marsily, G. (1986), Quantitative Hydrogeology-Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers, Academic, San Diego, Calif.
28. de Marsily, G. (1994), Quelques réflexions sur l'utilisation des modèles en hydrologie, Rev. Sci. l'Eau, 7, 219-234.
29. de Marsily, G. (2008), Eau, changements climatiques, alimentation et évolution démographique, J. Water Sci., 21(2), 111-128.
30. de Marsily, G., E. Ledoux, A. Levassor, D. Poitrinal, and A. Salem (1978), Modelling of large multilayered aquifer systems: Theory and applications, J. Hydrol., 36, 1-34.
31. de Marsily, G., J.-P. Delhomme, F. Delay, and A. Buoro (1999), Regards sur 40 ans de problèmes inverses en hydrogéologie, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 329, 73-87.
32. Deschesnes, J., J.-P. Villeneuve, E. Ledoux, and G. Girard (1985), Modeling the Hydrologic Cycle: The MC Model. Part I-Principles and description, Nord. Hydrol., 16, 257-272.
33. Distefano, N., and A. Rath (1975), An identification approach to subsurface hydrological systems, Water Resour. Res., 11(6), 1005-1012.
34. Doherty, J. (2003), Ground water model calibration using pilot points and regularization, Groundwater, 41(2), 170-177.
35. Ebel, B., and K. Loague (2006), Physics-based hydrologic-response simulation: Seeing through the fog of equifinality, Hydrol. Processes, 20, 2887-2900.
36. Ebel, B. A., B. B. Mirus, C. S. Heppner, J. E. VanderKwaak, and K. Loague (2009), First-order exchange coefficient coupling for simulating surface water-groundwater interactions: Parameter sensitivity and consistency with a physics-based approach, Hydrol. Processes, 23, 1949-1959, doi:10.1002/hyp.7279.
37. Efstratiadis, A., and D. Koutsoyiannis (2010), One decade of multi-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: A review, Hydrol. Sci. J., 55(1), 58-78.
38. Efstratiadis, A., I. Nalbantis, A. Koukouvinos, E. Rozos, and D. Koutsoyiannis (2008), HYDROGEIOS: A semi-distributed GIS-based hydrological model for modified river basins, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 989-1006.
39. Emsellem, Y., and G. de Marsily (1971), An automatic solution for the inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 7(5), 1264-1283.
40. Flipo, N., S. Even, M. Poulin, and E. Ledoux (2005), Hydrological part of CaWaQS (Catchment Water Quality Simulator): Fitting on a small sedimentary basin., Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol., 29(2), 768-772.
41. Flipo, N., S. Even, M. Poulin, S. Théry, and E. Ledoux (2007a), Modelling nitrate fluxes at the catchment scale using the integrated tool CaWaQS, Sci. Total Environ., 375, 69-79, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2006.12.016.
42. Flipo, N., N. Jeannée, M. Poulin, S. Even, and E. Ledoux (2007b), Assessment of nitrate pollution in the Grand Morin aquifers (France): Combined use of geostatistics and physically-based modeling, Environ. Pollut., 146(1), 241-256, doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2006.03.056.
43. Freeze, R. (1971), Three-dimensional, transient, saturated-unsaturated flow in a groundwater basin, Water Resour. Res., 7(2), 347-366.
44. Frind, E., and G. F. Pinder (1973), Galerkin solution of the inverse problem for aquifer transmissivity, Water Resour. Res., 9(5), 1397-1410.
45. Furman, A. (2008), Modeling coupled surfacesubsurface flow processes: A review, Vadose Zone J., 7(2), 741-756, doi:10.2136/vzj2007.0065.
46. Garcia, L. A., and A. Shigidib (2006), Using neural networks for parameter estimation in ground water, J. Hydrol., 318, 215-231.
47. Gill, M., Y. Kaheil, A. Khalil, M. McKee, and L. Bastidas (2006), Multiobjective particle swarm optimization for parameter estimation in hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 42, W07417, doi:10.1029/2005WR004528.
48. Girard, G., E. Ledoux, and J.-P. Villeneuve (1980), An integrated rainfall, surface and underground runoff model, Houille Blanche, 4/5, 315-320.
49. Giudici, M., and C. Vassena (2006), dsm.f90: A computer code for the solution of an inverse problem of ground water hydrology by the differential system method, Comput. Geosci., 32, 1709-1719.
50. Giudici, M., and C. Vassena (2008), Spectral analysis of the balance equation of ground water hydrology, Trans. Porous Media, 72, 171-178.
51. Giudici, M., G. Morossi, G. Parravicini, and G. Ponzini (1995), A new method for the identification of distributed transmissivities, Water Resour. Res., 31(8), 1969-1988.
52. Giudici, M., F. Delay, G. de Marsily, G. Parravicini, G. Ponzini, and A. Rosazza (1998), Discrete stability of the differential system method evaluated with geostatistical techniques, Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraul., 12(3), 191-204.
53. Goderniaux, P., S. Brouyre, H. Fowler, S. Blenkinsop, R. Therrien, P. Orban, and A. Dassargues (2009), Large scale surface-subsurface hydrological model to assess climate change impacts on groundwater reserves, J. Hydrol., 373(1-2), 122-138.
54. Golaz-Cavazzi, C. (1999), Modélisation hydrologique à l'échelle régionale appliquée au bassin du Rhône, PhD thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, Paris.
55. Gomez, E., et al. (2003), Un outil de modélisation intégrée du transfert des nitrates sur un système hydrologique: Application au bassin de la Seine, Houille Blanche, 3-2003, 38-45.
56. Gomez-Hernandez, J., A. Sahuquillo, and J. Capilla (1997), Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data-I. theory, J. Hydrol., 203, 162-174.
57. Gonzalez, R. V., M. Giudici, G. Ponzini, and G. Parravicini (1997), The differential system method for the identification of transmissivity and storativity, Transp. Porous Media, 26, 339-371.
58. Gupta, H., S. Sorooshian, and P. Yapo (1998), Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information, Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 751-763, doi :10.1029/97WR03495.
59. Habets, F., P. Etchevers, C. Golaz, E. Leblois, E. Ledoux, E. Martin, J. Noilhan, and C. Ottlé (1999), Simulation of the water budget and the river flows of the Rône basin, J. Geophys. Res., 104(D24), 31,145-31,172.
60. Hefez, E., U. Shamir, and J. Bear (1975), Identifying the parameters of an aquifer cell model, Water Resour. Res., 11(6), 993-1004.
61. Heidari, M., and S. R. Ranjithan (1998), A hybrid optimization approach to the estimation of distributed parameters in two-dimensional confined aquifers, J. Am. Water Res. Assoc., 34(4), 909-920.
62. Hendricks Franssen, H., A. Alcolea, M. Riva, M. Bakr, N. van der Wiel, F. Stauffer, and A. Guadagnini (2009), A comparison of seven methods for the inverse modelling of groundwater flow. Application to the characterisation of well catchments, Adv. Water Resour., 32, 851-872.
63. Hernandez, A., S. Neuman, A. Guadagnini, and J. Carrera (2003), Conditioning mean steady state flow on hydraulic head and conductivity through geostatistical inversion, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 17, 329-338.
64. Heuvelmans, G., B. Muys, and J. Feyen (2006), Regionalisation of the parameters of a hydrological model: Comparison of linear regression models with artificial neural nets, J. Hydrol., 319(1-4), 245-265.
65. Hoeksema, R., and P. Kitanidis (1985), Comparison of gaussian conditional mean and kriging estimation in the geostatistical solution of the inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 21(6), 825-836.
66. Hundecha, Y., and A. Bárdossy (2004), Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model, J. Hydrol., 292(1-4), 281-295, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.01.002.
67. Hunt, R., J. Doherty, and M. Tonkin (2007), Are models too simple? Arguments for increased parameterization, Groundwater, 45(3), 254-262.
68. Jang, J. (1996), Input selection for anfis learning, IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst., 2, 1493-1499.
69. Karahan, H., and M. T. Ayvaz (2008), Simultaneous parameter identification of a heterogeneous aquifer system using artificial neural networks, Hydrogeol. J., 16, 817-827.
70. Kholghi, M., and S. M. Hosseini (2006), Estimation of aquifer transmissivity using kriging, artificial neural network, and neuro-fuzzy models, J. Spatial Hydrol., 6, 68-81.
71. Khu, S.-T., H. Madsen, and F. di Pierro (2008), Incorporating multiple observations for distributed hydrologic model calibration: An approach using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and clustering, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1387-1398.
72. Kitanidis, P., and E. Vomvoris (1983), A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady state) and one-dimensional simulations, Water Resour. Res., 19(3), 677-690.
73. Kolditz, O., J. Delfs, C. Bürger, M. Beinhorn, and C. Parkee (2008), Numerical analysis of coupled hydrosystems based on an object-oriented compartment approach, J. Hydroinf., 10, 227-244.
74. Kollet, S. J., and R. M. Maxwell (2006), Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: A free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model, Adv. Water Resour., 29, 945-958.
75. Korkmaz, S. (2007), Modeling of the flood regimes in coupled stream-aquifer systems, PhD thesis, Ecole des Mines de Paris, Paris.
76. Korkmaz, S., E. Ledoux, and H. Önder (2009), Application of the coupled model to the Somme river basin, J. Hydrol., 366(1-4), 21-34, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.008.
77. Kurtulus, B., and N. Flipo (2012), Hydraulic head interpolation using anfis-Model selection and sensitivity analysis, Comput. Geosci., 38(1), 43-51, doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.04.019.
78. Kurtulus, B., and M. Razack (2007), Evaluation of the ability of an artificial neural network model to simulate the input-output responses of a large karstic aquifer. The La Rochefoucauld (Charente, France), Hydrogeol. J., 15(2), 241-254.
79. Kurtulus, B., and M. Razack (2010), Modeling daily discharge responses of a large karstic aquifer using soft computing methods: Artificial neural network and neuro-fuzzy, J. Hydrol., 381, 101-111.
80. Kurtulus, B., N. Flipo, P. Goblet, G. Vilain, J. Tournebize, and G. Tallec (2011), Hydraulic head interpolation in an aquifer unit using ANFIS and Ordinary Kriging, Stud. Comput. Intel., 343, 265-276, doi:10.1007/978-3-642- 20206-3-18.
81. LaVenue, A., B. RamaRao, G. de Marsily, and M. Marietta (1995), Pilot point methodology for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated transmissivity fields 2. Application, Water Resour. Res., 31(3), 495-516.
82. Leblois, E. (2008), Hydro-Logical processing of geographical information-Part one: DEM, Drainage pattern, Rivers, Basins, technical report, 44 p., Cemagref, Lyon, France, 236 pp.
83. Ledoux, E. (1980), Modélisation intégrée des écoulements de surface et des écoulements souterrains sur un bassin hydrologique, PhD thesis, 236 pp., Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, Paris.
84. Ledoux, E., G. Girard, and J. Villeneuve (1984), Proposition d'un modèle couplé pour la simulation conjointe des écoulements de surface et des écoulements souterrains sur un bassin hydrologique, Houille Blanche, 1-2, 101-110.
85. Ledoux, E., G. Girard, G. de Marsily, J. Villeneuve, and J. Deschenes (1989), Spatially distributed modeling: Conceptual approach, coupling surface water and groundwater, in Unsaturated Flow in Hydrologic Modeling-Theory and Practice, edited by H. J. Morel-Seytoux, pp. 435-454, Kluwer Academic, NATO ASI Ser. C, Norwell,Massachusetts.
86. Li, Q., A. Unger, E. Sudicky, D. Kassenaar, E. Wexler, and S. Shikaze (2008), Simulating the multi-seasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model, J. Hydrol., 357(3-4), 317-336.
87. Lin, G.-F., and G.-R. Chen (2006), An improved neural network approach to the determination of aquifer parameters, J. Hydrol., 316, 281-289, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.023.
88. Liu, H., N. Hsu, and T. H. Lee (2009), Simultaneous identification of parameter, initial condition, and boundary condition in groundwater modelling, Hydrol. Processes, 23(16), 2358-2367.
89. Loague, K., and J. VanderKwaak (2004), Physics-based hydrologic response: Platinium bridge, 1958 Edsel, or useful tool, Hydrol. Processes, 18, 2949-2956.
90. Madsen, H. (2003), Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives, Adv. Water Resour., 26, 205-216.
91. Maget, P. (1995), Piézométrie du système aquifère de Beauce-Basses eaux 1994, Tech. Rep. R 38572, Bur. de Rech. Geol. et Miner., Orléans, France. [Available at www.brgm.fr.]
92. Majdalani, S., and P. Ackerer (2011), Identification of groundwater parameters using an adaptative multiscale method, Groundwater, 49(4), 548-559, doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00750.x.
93. Marcotte, D., and P. Pasquier (2007), Reply to "Comments on steady-and transient-state inversion in hydrogeology by successive flux estimation" by G. Ponzini, M. Giudici and C. Vassena, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 2054-2057.
94. Mardhel, V., A. Gravier, J.-Y. Koch-Mathiann, C. Nowak, J.-L. Terreyre, M. Raguet, and C. Garnier (2006), Cartographie de la vulnérabilité simplifie ́e des eaux souterraines du bassin Seine-Normandie et application aux sites BASOL, in Proceedings of International Symposium Darcy 2006-Aquifers Systems Management, Dijon, France, pp. 15-25. [Available at http://www.brgm.fr/brgm/aih/fichier/actes/theme4-p38-63.pdf.]
95. Mazi, K., A. D. Koussis, P. J. Restrepo, and D. Koutsoyiannis (2004), A groundwater-based, objective-heuristic parameter optimisation method for a precipitation-runoff model and its application to a semi-arid basin, J. Hydrol., 290(3-4), 243-258, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.006.
96. McLaughlin, D., and L. Townley (1996), A reassessment of the groundwater inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 32(5), 1131-1161.
97. Medina, A., and J. Carrera (2003), Geostatistical inversion of coupled problems: dealing with computational burden and different types of data, J. Hydrol., 281, 251-264.
98. Meier, P., A. Medina, and J. Carrera (2001), Geostatistical inversion of cross-hole pumping tests for identifying preferential flow channels within a shear zone, Groundwater, 39(1), 10-17.
99. Mirus, B. B., B. A. Ebel, K. Loague, and B. C. Wemple (2007), Simulated effect of a forest road on near-surface hydrologic response: Redux, Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 32, 126-142.
100. Mirus, B. B., K. Loague, J. E. VanderKwaak, S. K. Kampf, and S. J. Burges (2009), A hypothetical reality of Tarrawarra-like hydrologic response, Hydrol. Processes, 23, 1093-1103.
101. Monteil, C., N. Flipo, M. Poulin, F. Habets, M. Krimissa, and E. Ledoux (2010), Assessing the contribution of the main aquifer units of the Loire basin to river discharge during low flows, in Proceedings of XVIII International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources, Barcelona. [Available at http://congress.cimne.com/cmwr2010/Proceedings/docs/p71.pdf.]
102. Mukhopadhyay, A. (1999), Spatial estimation of transmissivity using artificial neural network, Groundwater, 37, 458-464.
103. Nalbantis, I., A. Efstratiadis, E. Rozos, M. Kopsiafti, and D. Koutsoyiannis (2011), Holistic versus monomeric strategies for hydrological modelling of human-modified hydrosystems, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15(3), 743-758, doi:10.5194/hess-15-743-2011.
104. Nash, J., and J. Sutcliffe (1970), River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I, A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290.
105. Navarro, A. (1977), A modified optimization method of estimating aquifer parameters, Water Resour. Res., 13(6), 935-939.
106. Neuman, S., and S. Yakowitz (1979), A statistical approach for the inverse problem of aquifer hydrology 1. Theory, Water Resour. Res., 15(4), 845-860.
107. Neuman, S., G. Fogg, and E. Jacobson (1980), A statistical approach to the inverse problem of aquifer hydrology: 2. Case study, Water Resour. Res., 16(1), 33-58.
108. Nutbrown, D. (1975), Identification of parameters in a linear equation of groundwater flow, Water Resour. Res., 11(4), 581-588.
109. Panday, S., and P. S. Huyakorn (2004), A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/subsurface flow, Adv. Water Resour., 27, 361-382.
110. Pasquier, P., and D. Marcotte (2006), Steady-and transient-state inversion in hydrogeology by successive flux estimation, Adv. Water Resour., 29(12), 1934-1952.
111. Poeter, E., and M. Hill (1997), Inverse models: A necessary next step in ground-water modeling, Groundwater, 35(2), 250-260.
112. Polus, E., N. Flipo, C. de Fouquet, and M. Poulin (2011), Geostatistics for assessing the efficiency of distributed physically-based water quality model. Application to nitrates in the Seine River, Hydrol. Processes, 25(2), 217-233, doi:10.1002/hyp.7838.
113. Ponzini, G., and A. Lozej (1982), Identification of aquifer transmissivities: The comparison model method, Water Resour. Res., 18(3), 597-622.
114. Ponzini, G., Giudici, and C. M., Vassena (2007), Comments on "Steady-and transient-state inversion in hydrogeology by successive flux estimation" by P. Pasquier and D.Marcotte, Adv. Water Resour., 30(9), 2051-2053.
115. Quintana-Segu, P., P. L. Moigne, Y. Durand, E. Martin, F. Habets, M. Baillon, C. Canellas, L. Franchisteguy, and S. Morel (2008), Analysis of near-surface atmospheric variables: Validation of the SAFRAN analysis over France, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 47, 92-107.
116. RamaRao, B., A. LaVenue, G. de Marsily, and M. Marietta (1995), Pilot point methodology for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated transmissivity fields 1. Theory and computational experiments, Water Resour. Res., 31(3), 475-493.
117. RamaRao, B., A. LaVenue, G. de Marsily, and M. Marietta (2000), Reply, Water Resour. Res., 36(9), 2799-2803.
118. Refsgaard, J. C. (1997), Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 198, 69-97.
119. Refsgaard, J., and H. Henriksen (2004), Modelling guidelines-Terminology and guiding principles, Adv. Water Resour., 27(1), 71-82.
120. Renard, F., and N. Jeannée (2008), Estimating transmissivity fields and their influence on flow and transport: The case of champagne mounts, Water Resour. Res., 44, W11414, doi:10.1029/2008WR007033.
121. Roth, C., J.-P. Chilès, and C. de Fouquet (1998), Combining geostatistics and flow simulators to identify transmissivity, Adv. Water Resour., 21, 555-565.
122. Rozos, E., A. Efstratiadis, I. Nalbantis, and D. Koutsoyiannis (2004), Calibration of a semi-distributed model for conjunctive simulation of surface and groundwater flows, Hydrol. Sci. J., 49(5), 819-842.
123. Rubin, Y., and G. Dagan (1987), Stochastic identification of translissivity and effective recharge in steady groundwater flow: 1. Case study, Water Resour. Res., 23(7), 1193-1200.
124. Sadeghipour, J., and W. W.-G. Yeh (1984), Parameter identification of groundwater aquifer models: A generalized least squares approach, Water Resour. Res., 20(7), 971-979.
125. Sagar, B., S. Yakowitz, and L. Duckstein (1975), A direct method for the identification of the parameters of dynamic nonhomogeneous aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 11(4), 563-570.
126. Saleh, F., N. Flipo, F. Habets, A. Ducharne, L. Oudin, P. Viennot, and E. Ledoux (2011),Modeling the impact of in-streamwater level fluctuations on stream-aquifer interactions at the regional scale, J. Hydrol., 400(3-4), 490-500, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.001.
127. Samani, N., M. Gohari-Moghadam, and A. Safavi (2007), A simple neural network model for the determination of aquifer parameters, J. Hydrol., 340, 1-11.
128. Schellart, A., S. Tait, and R. Ashley (2010), Towards quantification of uncertainty in predicting water quality failures in integrated catchment model studies, Water Res., 44(13), 3893-3904.
129. Shrestha, R. R., and M. Rode (2008), Multi-objective calibration and fuzzy preference selection of a distributed hydrological model, Environ. Modell. Software, 23, 1384-1395.
130. Sun, N.-Z., and W. W.-G. Yeh (1985), Identification of parameter structure in groundwater inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 21(6), 869-883.
131. Sun, N.-Z., and W. W.-G. Yeh (1992), A stochastic inverse solution for transient groundwater flow: Parameter identification and reliability analysis, Water Resour. Res., 28(12), 3269-3280, doi:10.1029/92WR00683.
132. Therrien, R., R. McLaren, E. Sudicky, and S. Panday (2010), HydroGeo-Sphere: A three-dimensional numerical model describing fully-integrated subsurface and surface flow and solute transport, technical report, Univ.
133. Thierion, C., F. Habets, E. Ledoux, P. Viennot, E. Martin, S. Queguiner, P. Ackerer, S. Majdalani, E. Leblois, and S. Lecluse (2010), Modelling the surface water and ground water system of the Upper Rhine graben, in Proceedings of XVIII International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources, Barcelona, edited by J. Carrera. [Available at http://congress.cimne.com/ cmwr2010/Proceedings/docs/p26.pdf.]
134. VanderKwaak, J. E., and K. Loague (2001), Hydrologic-response simulations for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model, Water Resour. Res., 37, 999-1013.
135. Vassena, C., C. Durante, M. Giudici, and G. Ponzini (2008), The importance of observations on fluxes to constrain ground water model calibration, Phys. Chem. Earth, 33, 1105-1110.
136. Vemuri, V., and W. J. Karplus (1969), Identification of nonlinear parameters of ground water basins by hybrid computation, Water Resour. Res., 5(1), 172-185.
137. Verley, F., F. Brunson, P. Verjus, and M. Cholez (2003), Nappe de Beauce-Piézométrie hautes eaux 2002, technical report, DIREN Centre et Ile-de-France, Orleans, France.
138. Weill, S., E. Mouche, and J. Patin (2009), A generalized Richards equation for surface/subsurface flow modelling, J. Hydrol., 366(1-4), 9-20.
139. Wen, X. H., J. E. Capilla, C. V. Deutsch, J. J. Gómez- Hernàndez, and A. S. Cullick (1999), A program to create permeability fields that honor single-phase flow rate and pressure data, Comput. Geosci., 25(3), 217-230.
140. Wen, X.-H., C. Deutsch, and A. Cullick (2002), Construction of geostatistical aquifer models integrating dynamic flow and tracer data using inverse technique, J. Hydrol., 255, 151-168.
141. Woodbury, A., and L. Smith (1987), Simultaneous inversion of hydrogeologic and thermal data 1. Theory and application using hydraulic head data, Water Resour. Res., 23(8), 1586-1606.
142. Yeh, W.-G. (1986), Review of parameter identification in groundwater hydrology: The inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 22(2), 95-108.
143. Yeh, W.-G., and Y. Yoon (1981), Aquifer parameter identification with optimum dimension in parametrization, Water Resour. Res., 17(3), 664-672.
144. Yeh, W. W.-G., and G. W. Tauxe (1971), Optimal identification of aquifer diffusivity using quasilinearization, Water Resour. Res., 7(4), 955-962.
145. Zhang, X., R. Srinivasan, K. Zhao, and M. V. Liew (2009), Evaluation of global optimization algorithms for parameter calibration of a computationally intense hydrologic model, Hydrol. Processes, 23, 430-441.
146. Zimmerman, D., et al. (1998), A comparison of seven geostatistically based inverse approaches to estimate transmissivities for modeling advective transport by groundwater flow, Water Resour. Res., 34(6), 1373-1413.