Simulating the multi-seasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 357, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 317-336

  Li, Q ^a,b   Unger, A J A ^a   Sudicky, E A ^a   Kassenaar, D ^b   Wexler, E J ^b   Shikaze, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b EarthFX Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

Groundwater; Hydrologic model; Surface water; Watershed

Indexed keywords

HYDRAULIC MODELS;

(1 1 0) SURFACE; HYDROLOGIC MODELING;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

GROUNDWATER; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; SEASONAL VARIATION; STREAMFLOW; SURFACE WATER; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; TRANSPIRATION; WATER BUDGET; WATERSHED;

CANADA; DUFFINS CREEK; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO [CANADA]; TORONTO;

EID: 47049086157     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson J., Dybkjaer G., Jensen K.H., Refsgaard J.C., and Rasmussen K. Use of remotely sensed precipitation and leaf area index in a distributed hydrological model. J. Hydrol. 264 (2002) 34-50
2. Beven K. Changing ideas in hydrology - the case for physically-based models. J. Hydrol. 105 (1989) 157-172
3. Beven K. Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modeling. Adv. Water Res. 16 (1993) 41-51
4. Beven K. Equifinality and uncertainty in geomorphological modeling. In: Rhoads B.L., and Thorn C.E. (Eds). The Scientific Nature of Geomorphology (1996), Wiley, Chichester, UK 289-313
5. Beven K. A discussion of distributed hydrological modeling. In: Abbott M.B., and Refsgaard J.C. (Eds). Distributed Hydrological Modelling (1996), Kluwer, The Netherlands 255-278
6. Beven K. On the future of distributed modeling in hydrology. Hydrol. Proc. 14 (2000) 3183-3184
7. Beven K. How far can we go in distributed hydrological modeling?. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 5 (2001) 1-12
8. Beven K. On explanatory depth and predictive power. Hydrol. Proc. 15 (2001) 3069-3072
9. Beven K. Towards a coherent philosophy for modeling the environment. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A: Math Phys. Sci. 458 (2002) 2465-2484
10. Beven K. Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modeling system. Hydrol. Proc. 16 (2002) 189-206
11. Beven K. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. J. Hydrol. 320 (2006) 18-36
12. Beven K., and Binley A. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol. Proc. 6 (1992) 279-298
13. Canadell J., Jackson R.B., Ehleringer J.R., Mooney H.A., Sala O.E., and Schulze E.-D. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia 108 (1996) 583-595
14. Dickenson R.E., Henderson-Sellers A., Rosenzweig C., and Sellers P.J. Evapotranspiration models with canopy resistance for use in climate models: A review. Agric. For. Meteorol. 54 (1991) 373-388
15. Di Iorio, T.A., 2003. Impact of surficial contaminant loadings on streamwater quality in an integrated surface-subsurface hydrologic modeling environment. M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 92 pp.
16. Earthfx Inc., 2004. Groundwater modeling of the Oak Ridges Moraine; Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) watersheds. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
17. Ebel B.A., and Loague K. Physics-based hydrologic response simulation: Seeing through the fog of equifinality. Hydrol. Proc. 20 13 (2006) 2887-2900
18. Eyles N.E. Environmental geology of a supercity: the greater Toronto area. In: Eyles N.E. (Ed). Environmental Geology of Urban Areas 3 (1997), Geological Association of Canada, Geotext 7-80
19. Freeze R.A., and Cherry J.C. Groundwater (1979), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
20. Freeze R.A., and Harlan R.L. Blueprint for a physically-based digitally-simulated hydrologic response model. J. Hydrol. 9 (1969) 237-258
21. Gavilan P., and Lorite I.J. Regional calibration of Hargreaves equation for estimating reference ET in a semiarid environment. Agric. Water Manage. 81 (2006) 257-281
22. Gerber R.E., and Howard K.W.F. Groundwater recharge to the Oak Ridges Moraine. In: Eyles N.E. (Ed). Environmental Geology of Urban Areas 3 (1997), Geological Association of Canada, Geotext 7-80
23. Gerber R.E., and Howard K.W.F. Hydrogeology of the Oak Ridges Moraine aquifer system: implications for protection and management from the Duffins Creek watershed. Can. J. Earth Sci. 39 (2002) 1333-1348
24. Graham D., and Kilde L. MIKE-SHE Users Guide (2002), Danish Hydraulic Institute, Denmark
25. Grayson R.B., Moore I.D., and McMahon T.A. Physically based hydrologic modeling, 2. Is the concept realistic?. Water Resour. Res. 28 (1992) 2659-2666
26. Hargreaves G.H., and Allen R.G. History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equation. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. ASCE 129 1 (2003) 53-63
27. Hargreaves G.H., and Samani Z.A. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl. Eng. Agric. 1 2 (1985) 96-99
28. Heppner C.S., Ran Q., VanderKwaak J.E., and Loague K. Adding sediment transport to the integrated hydrology model (InHM): Development and testing. Adv. In Water Res. 29 6 (2006) 930-943
29. HydroGeoLogic, 2000. MODHMS: a comprehensive MODFLOW-based hydrologic modeling system. Version 1.1. Code Documentation and User's Guide. HydroGeoLogic Inc., Herndon, VA, USA.
30. Islam, Md. N., 2004. Automated calibration of a physically-based hydrologic model to simulate water balance variables for water and crop management. Ph.D. Thesis. University of California at Davis, Davis, California, USA.
31. Johnson, M.D., Armstrong, D.K., Stanford, B.V., Telford, P.G., Rutka, M., 1992. Paleozoic and Mesozoic geology of Ontario. In: Thurston, P.C., Williams, H.R., Sutcliffe, R.H., Stott, G.M. (Eds.), Geology of Ontario, Ontario Geological Survey, Special vol. 4. Part 2. pp. 907-1010.
32. Jones, J.P., 2005. Simulating hydrologic systems using a physically-based, surface-subsurface model: Issues concerning flow, transport and parameterization. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 145 pp.
33. Jones J.P., Sudicky E.A., and McLaren R.G. Application of a fully-integrated surface-subsurface flow model at the watershed-scale: A scale study. Water Resour. Res. 44 (2008) W03407 10.1029/2006WR005603
34. Jones J.P., Sudicky E.A., Brookfield A.E., and Park Y.-J. An assessment of the tracer-based approach to quantifying groundwater contributions to streamflow. Water Resour. Res. 42 (2006) W02407 10.1029/2005WR004130
35. Kristensen K.J., and Jensen S.E. A model for estimating actual evapotranspiration from potential evapotranspiration. Nordic Hydrol. 6 (1975) 170-188
36. Loague K., and VanderKwaak J.E. Simulating hydrological response for the R-5 catchment: comparison of two models and the impact of roads. Hydrol. Proc. 16 5 (2002) 1015-1032
37. Loague K., and VanderKwaak J.E. Physics-based hydrologic response simulation: platinum bridge, 1958 Edsel, or useful tool?. Hydrol. Proc. 16 5 (2004) 1015-1032
38. Loague K., Heppner C.S., Abrams R.H., Carr A.E., VanderKwaak J.E., and Ebel B.A. Further testing of the integrated hydrology model (InHM): event-based simulations for a small rangeland catchment located near Chickasha, Oklahoma. Hydrol. Proc. 19 7 (2005) 1373-1398
39. Loague K., Heppner C.S., Mirus B.B., Ebel B.A., Carr A.E., BeVille S.H., and VanderKwaak J.E. Physics-based hydrologic-response simulation: foundation for hydroecology and hydrogeomorphology. Hydrol. Proc. 20 (2006) 1231-1237
40. McCuen R. Hydrologic Analysis and Design (1989), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
41. Meriano, M., 1999. Hydrogeology of a complex glacial system, Rouge River - Highland Creek watershed, Scarborough, Ontario. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
42. Mukammal E.I., and Neuman H.H. Application of the Priestley-Taylor evaporation model to assess the influence of soil moisture on the evaporation from a large weighing lysimeter and class A pan. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 12 (1977) 243-256
43. Mukammal E.I., McKay G.A., and Turner V.R. Mechanical balance-electrical readout weighing lysimeter. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 2 (1971) 207-217
44. Panday S., and Huyakorn P.S. A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluation surface/subsurface flow. Adv. Water Resour. 27 (2004) 361-382
45. Pebesma E.J., Switzer P., and Loague K. Error analysis for the evaluation of model performance: rainfall-runoff event time series data. Hydrol. Proc. 19 8 (2005) 1529-1548
46. Reefsgaard J.C., Storm B., and Abbott M.B. Comment on "A discussion of distributed hydrological modeling" by K. Beven. In: Abbott M.B., and Refsgaard J.C. (Eds). Distributed Hydrological Modelling (1996), Kluwer, The Netherlands 279-287
47. Schroeder, P.R., Aziz, N.M., Lloyd, C.M., Zappi, P.A., 1994. The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model: User's Guide for Version 3, EPA/600/R-94/168a, September 1994. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.
48. Shaap M.G., Liej F.J., and van Genuchten M.Th. A bootstrap-neural network approach to predict soil hydraulic parameters. In: van Genuchten M.Th., Liej F.J., and Wu L. (Eds). Characterization and Measurements of the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Porous Media (1999), University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA 1237-1250
49. Sharpe, D.R., Russell, H.A.J., Logan, C., 1999. Structural model of the Oak Ridges Moraine and Greater Toronto Areas, Southern Ontario: Lower Sediments. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 4242, Scale 1:250,000.
50. Smith R.E., Goodrich D.R., Woolhiser D.A., and Simanton J.R. Comment on "Physically based hydrologic modeling, 2. Is the concept realistic?" by R.B. Grayson, I.D. Moore and T.A. McMahon. Water Resour. Res. 30 (1994) 851-854
51. Sudicky E.A., Unger A.J.A., and Lacombe S. A noniterative technique for the direct implementation of well-bore boundary conditions in three-dimensional heterogeneous formations. Water Resour. Res. 31 2 (1995) 411-415
52. Therrien, R., McLaren, R.G., Sudicky, E.A., Panday, S.M., 2005. HydroGeoSphere: a three-dimensional numerical model describing fully-integrated subsurface and surface flow and solute transport. Groundwater Simulations Group, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 322 p.
53. VanderKwaak, J.E., 1999. Numerical simulation of flow and chemical transport in integrated surface-subsurface hydrologic systems. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 217 p.
54. VanderKwaak J.E., and Loague K. Hydrologic-response simulations for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model. Water Resour. Res. 37 (2001) 999-1013
55. van Genuchten M.Th. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44 (1980) 892-898
56. Vazquez R.F., and Feyen J. Effect of potential evapotranspiration estimates on effective parameters and performance of the MIKE-SHE code applied to a medium size catchment. J. Hydrol. 270 (2003) 309-327
57. Vazquez R.F.L., Feyen J., and Refsgaard J.C. Effect of grid size on effective parameters and model performance of the MIKE-SHE code. Hydrol. Proc. 16 (2002) 355-372