Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 205-216

  Madsen, Henrik ^a  

^a DHI   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Automatic calibration; Distributed model; Hydrological modelling; MIKE SHE; Multiple objectives; Parameter estimation

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; GROUNDWATER; HYDROLOGY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL CATCHMENTS;

CATCHMENTS;

CALIBRATION; CATCHMENT; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PARAMETERIZATION;

EID: 0037300813     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00092-1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bergström S. The HBV model. In: Singh VP,editor. Computer models of watershed hydrology. Colorado: Water Resources Publications; 1995. p. 443-76.
2. Boyle DP,Gupta HV,Sorooshian S. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods. Water Resour Res 2000;36(12):3663-74.
3. Burnash RJC. The NWS river forecast system-catchment modeling. In: Singh VP, editor. Computer models of watershed hydrology. Colorado: Water Resources Publications; 1995. p. 311-66.
4. Cooper VA, Nguyen VTV, Nicell JA. Evaluation of global optimization methods for conceptual rainfall-runoff model calibration. Water Sci Technol 1997;36(5):53-60.
5. Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Gupta V. Effective and effecient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runo. models. Water Resour Res 1992;28(4):1015-31.
6. Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Gupta VK. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. J Hydrol 1994;158:265-84.
7. Franchini M, Galeati G, Berra S. Global optimization techniques for the calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Sci J 1998;43(3):443-58.
8. Gan TY, Biftu GF. Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfallrun-off models: Optimization algorithms,catchment conditions, and model structure. Water Resour Res 1996;32(12):3513-24.
9. Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO. Toward improved calibration of hydrological models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information. Water Resour Res 1998;34(4): 751-63.
10. Havnø K, Madsen MN, Dørge J. MIKE 11-a generalized river modelling package. In: Singh VP,editor. Computer models of watershed hydrology. Colorado: Water Resources Publications; 1995. p. 733-82.
11. Heidari M, Ranjitha n SR. A hybrid optimization approach to the estimation of distributed parameters in two-dimensional confined aquifers. J Am Water Resour Assoc 1998;34(4):909-20.
12. Hill MC. Methods and guidelines for effective model calibration. US Geological Survey,Water Resources Investigations Report 98-4005, 1998.
13. Karpouzos DK, Delay F, Katsifarakis KL, de Marsily G. A multipopulation genetic algorithm to solve the inverse problem in hydrogeology. Water Resour Res 2001;37(9):2291-302.
14. Kristensen KJ, Jensen SE. A model for estimating actual evapotranspiration from potential evapotranspiration. Nordic Hydrol 1975;6:70-88.
15. Kuczera G. Effecient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models. Water Resour Res 1997;33(1):177-85.
16. Madsen H. Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. J Hydrol 2000;235:276-88.
17. Madsen H. Automatic Calibration and Uncertainty Assessment in Rainfall-Runoff Modelling, 2000 Joint Conference on Water Resources Engineering and Water Resources Planning & Management, Hyatt Regency Minneapolis, USA,July 30-August 2, 2000.
18. Madsen H, Wilson G, Ammentorp HC. Comparison of different automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models. J Hydrol 2002;261:48-59.
19. McLaughlin D, Townley LR. A reassessment of the groundwater inverse problem. Water Resour Res 1996;32(5):1131-61.
20. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: Adiscussion of principles. J Hydrol 1970;10:282-90.
21. Refsgaard JC. Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. J Hydrol 1997;198:69-97.
22. Refsgaard JC, Storm B. MIKE SHE. In: Singh VP, editor. Computer models of watershed hydrology. Colorado: Water Resources Publications; 1995. p. 809-46.
23. Refsgaard JC, Storm B. Construction, calibration and validation of hydrological models. In: Abbott MB, Refsgaard JC, editors. Distributed hydrological modelling. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. p. 41-54.
24. Solomatine DP, Dibiki YB, Kukuric N. Automatic calibration of groudwater models using global optimisation techniques. Hydrol Sci J 1999;44(6):879-94.
25. Sorooshian S, Gupta VK. Model calibration. In: Singh VP, editor. Computer models of watershed hydrology. Colorado: Water Resources Publications; 1995. p. 23-68.
26. Spear RC, Hornberger GM. Eutrophication in peel inlet. II: Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis. Water Res 1980;14:43-9.
27. Thiemann M, Trosset M, Gupta H, Sorooshian S. Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrological models. Water Resour Res 2001;37(10):2521-35.
28. Thyer M, Kuczera G, Bates BC. Probabilistic optimisation for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: a comparison of the shuffled complex evolution and simulated annealing algorithms. Water Resour Res 1999;35(3):767-73.
29. Van Griensven A, Bauwens W. Multi-objective calibration in integrated river basin modelling, Geophysic al Research Abstracts, vol. 3. European Geophysical Society,26th General Assembly, 2001.
30. Wang QJ. The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour Res 1991;27(9): 2467-71.