Physics-based hydrologic response simulation: Platinum bridge, 1958 Edsel, or useful tool

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 18, Issue 15, 2004, Pages 2949-2956

  Loague, Keith ^a   VanderKwaak, Joel E ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE;

EID: 7244245534     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5737     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O'Connell PE, Rasmussen JL. 1986. An introduction to the European Hydrology System SHE, 2: structure of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. Journal of Hydrology 87: 61-77.
2. Akan AO, Yen BC. 1981a. Mathematical model of shallow water flow over porous media. Journal of Hydraulics Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 107: 479-494.
3. Akan AO, Yen BC. 1981b. Diffusion-wave flood routing in channel networks. Journal of Hydraulics Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 107: 719-732.
4. Alley WM, Dawdy DR, Schaake JC. 1980. Parametric-deterministic urban watershed model. Journal of Hydraulics Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 106: 679-690.
5. Anderson SP, Dietrich WE, Montgomery DR, Torres R, Conrad ME, Loague K. 1997. Subsurface flowpaths in a steep, unchanneled catchment. Water Resources Research 33: 2637-2653.
6. Beven K. 1977. Hillslope hydrographs by the finite element method. Earth Surface Processes 2: 13-28.
7. Beven K. 1989. Changing ideas in hydrology-the case of physically-based models. Journal of Hydrology 105: 157-172.
8. Beven K. 1993. Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modeling. Advances in Water Resources 16: 41-51.
9. Beven K. 1996a. Equifinality and uncertainty in geomorphological modeling. In The Scientific Nature of Geomorphology, Rhoads BL, Thorn CE (eds). Wiley: Chichester, UK; 289-313.
10. Beven K. 1996b. A discussion of distributed hydrological modelling. In Distributed Hydrological Modelling, Abbott MB, Refsgaard JC (eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 255-278.
11. Beven K. 2000a. On the future of distributed modeling in hydrology. Hydrological Processes 14: 3183-3184.
12. Beven K. 2001a. How far can we go in distributed hydrological modeling? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 5: 1-12.
13. Beven K. 2001b. On explanatory depth and predictive power. Hydrological Processes 15: 3069-3072.
14. Beven K. 2001c. Calibration, validation and equifinality in hydrological modeling: a continuing discussion.... In Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological Science, Anderson MG, Bates PD (eds). Wiley: Chichester, UK, 43-55.
15. Beven K. 2002a. Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system. Hydrological Processes 16: 189-206.
16. Beven K. 2002b. Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences 458: 2465-2484.
17. Beven K. 2004a. A manifesto for the equilinality thesis. Water Resources Research in press.
18. Beven K. 2004b. Robert E. Horton's perceptual model of infiltration processes. Hydrological Processes 18: in press.
19. Beven KJ. 2000b. Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 4: 203-213.
20. Beven KJ. 2003. On environmental models of everywhere on the GRID. Hydrological Processes 17: 171-174.
21. Beven K, Binley AM. 1992. The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes 6: 279-298.
22. Beven K, Freer J. 2001. Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems. Journal of Hydrology 249: 11-29.
23. Beven K, Kirkby MJ. 1979. A physically-based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin 24: 43-69.
24. Beven KJ, Calver A, Morris EM. 1987. The Institute of Hydrology distributed model. Report 98, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford.
25. Binley AM, Beven K, Elgy J. 1989. A physicaBy-based model of heterogeneous hillslopes. II. Effective hydraulic conductivities. Water Resources Research 25: 1227-1233.
26. Bonsall TE. 2002. Disaster in Dearborn: The Story of the Edsel. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.
27. Bras RL, Tucker GE, Teles V. 2003. Six myths about mathematical modeling in geomorphology. In Prediction in Geomorphology, Wilcock PR, Iverson RM (eds). Geophysical Monograph 135. American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC; 63-79.
28. Brazier RE, Beven KJ, Freer J, Rowan JS. 2000. Equifinallity and uncertainty in physically based soil erosion models: application of the GLUE methodology to WEPP-the water erosion prediction project-for sites in the UK and USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25: 825-845.
29. Clarke RT. 1973. A review of some mathematical models used in hydrology, with observations on their calibration and use. Journal of Hydrology 19: 1-20.
30. Dunne T. 1983. Relation of field studies and modeling in the prediction of storm runoff. Journal of Hydrology 65: 25-48.
31. Dunne T. 1998. Wolman lecture: Hydrologic science ... in landscapes... on a planet ... in the future. In Hydrologic Sciences: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead. National Academy Press: Washington, DC; 10-43.
32. Dunne T, Black RD. 1970a. An experimental investigation of runoff production in permeable soils. Water Resources Research 6: 478-490.
33. Dunne T, Black RD. 1970b. Partial area contributions to storm runoff in a small New England watershed. Water Resources Research 6: 1296-1311.
34. Engman ET, Rogowski AS. 1974. A partial area model for storm flow synthesis. Water Resources Research 10: 464-472.
35. Entekhabi D, Asrar GR, Betts AK, Beven KJ, Bras RL, Duffy CJ, Dunne T, Koster RD, Lettemnaier DP, McLaughlin DB, Shuttleworth WJ, van Genuchten MT, Wei M-Y, Wood EF. 1999. An agenda for land surface hydrology research and a call for the second International Hydrological Decade. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 80: 2043-2058.
36. Ettinger MB. 1965. How to plan an inconsequential research project. Journal of Sanitary Engineering 91: 19-22.
37. Freeze RA. 1971. Three-dimensional, transient, saturated-unsaturated flow in a groundwater basin. Water Resources Research 7: 347-366.
38. Freeze RA. 1972a. Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff. 1. Base flow contributions to channel flow. Water Resources Research 8: 609-623.
39. Freeze RA. 1972b. Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 2. Upstream source areas. Water Resources Research 8: 1272-1283.
40. Freeze RA. 1973. Reply. Water Resources Research 9: 491.
41. Freeze RA. 1982. Hydrological concepts in stochastic and deterministic rainfall-runoff predictions. In Recent Trends in Hydrogeology, Narasimhan RN (ed.). Geological Society of America, Special Papers 189: 63-79.
42. Freeze RA, Harlan RL. 1969. Blueprint for a physically-based digitally simulated, hydrologic response model. Journal of Hydrology 9: 237-258.
43. Govindaraju RS, Kavvas ML. 1991. Dynamics of moving boundary overland flows over infiltrating surfaces at hillslopes. Water Resources Research 27: 1885-1898.
44. Klemes V. 1986. Dilettantism in hydrology: transition or destiny? Water Resources Research 22: 177S-188S.
45. Klemes V. 1997. Guest editorial: Of carts and horses in hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2: 43-49.
46. Leavesley GH, Lichly RW, Troutman BM, Saindon LG. 1983. Precipitation-runoff modeling system-user's manual. Water Resources Investigation Report, US Geological Survey.
47. Loague K. 1991. Space-time tradeoffs across the hydrologic data sets of competing rainfall-runoff models: a preliminary analysis. Water Resources Bulletin 27: 781-789.
48. Loague K, Gander GA. 1990. R-5 revisited: 1. Spatial variability of infiltration on a small rangeland catchment. Water Resources Research 26: 957-971.
49. Loague K, Kyriakidis PC. 1997. Spatial and temporal variability in the R-5 infiltration data set: deja vu. and rainfall-runoff simulations. Water Resources Research 33: 2883-2895.
50. Loague K, VanderKwaak JE. 2002. Simulating hydrologic response for the R-5 catchment: comparison of two models and the impact of the roads. Hydrological Processes 16: 1015-1032.
51. Loague K, Heppner CS, Abrams RH, VanderKwaak JE, Carr AE, Ebel BA. 2004. Further testing of the Integrated Hydrology Model (InHM): event-based simulations for a small rangeland catchment located near Chickasha, Oklahoma. Hydrological Processes 18: in press.
52. Loague KM, Freeze RA. 1985. A comparison of rainfall-runoff modeling techniques on small upland catchments. Water Resources Research 21: 229-248.
53. McDonnell JJ. 1990. A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. Water Resources Research 26: 2821-2832.
54. Moore ID, Grayson RB. 1991. Terrain-based catchment partitioning and runoff prediction using vector elevation data. Water Resources Research 27: 1177-1191.
55. Morita M, Yen BC. 2000. Numerical methods for conjunctive two-dimensional surface and three-dimensional sub-surface flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 32: 921-957.
56. Morita M, Yen BC. 2002. Modeling of conjunctive two-dimensional surface-three-dimensional subsurface flows. Journal of Hydraulics Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 128: 184-200.
57. Reggiani P, Schellekens J. 2003. Modelling of hydrological response: the representative elementary watershed approach as an alternative blueprint for watershed modelling. Hydrological Processes 17: 3785-3789.
58. Ross BB, Contractor DN, Shanholz VO. 1979. A finite element model of overland and channel flow for assessing the hydrological impact of land-use change. Journal of Hydrology 41: 10-30. physics-based
59. Savenije HHG. 2001. Equifinality, a blessing in disguise? Hydrological Processes 15: 2835-2838.
60. Singh VP, Woolhiser DA. 2002. Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 7: 270-292.
61. Smith RE, Hebbert RHB. 1983. Mathematical simulation of interdependent surface and subsurface hydrologic response. Water Resources Research 19: 987-1001.
62. Smith RE, Woolhiser DA. 1971. Overland flow on an infiltration surface. Water Resources Research 7: 899-913.
63. Snyder WM. 1973. Comments on 'Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff. 1. Base flow contributions to channel flow' by R. Allan Freeze. Water Resources Research 9: 489-490.
64. Stephenson GA, Freeze RA. 1974. Mathematical simulation of subsurface flow contributions to snowmelt runoff, Reynolds Creek Watershed, Idaho. Water Resources Research 10: 284-294.
65. VanderKwaak JE. 1999. Numerical simulation of flow and chemical transport in integrated surface-subsurface hydrologic systems. PhD dissertation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.
66. VanderKwaak JE, Loague K. 2001. Hydrologic-response simulation for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model. Water Resources Research 37: 999-1013.
67. Weizenbaum J. 1976. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. W.H. Freeman: New York.
68. Wigmosta MS, Barges SJ. 1997. An adaptive modeling and monitoring approach to describe the hydrologic behavior of small catchments. Journal of Hydrology 202: 48-77.
69. Wigmosta MS, Vail LW, Lettenmaier DP. 1994. A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain. Water Resources Research 30: 1665-1679.
70. Woolhiser DA. 1996. Search for physically based runoff model-a hydrologic El Dorado? Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 122: 122-129.
71. Woolhiser DA, Smith RE, Goodrich DC. 1990. KINEROS, a kinematic runoff and erosion model. documentation and user manual. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, ARS-77.