A simple neural network model for the determination of aquifer parameters

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 340, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 1-11

  Samani, N ^a   Gohari Moghadam, M ^a   Safavi, A A ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Back propagation; Confined aquifer parameters; Levenberg Marquardt (LM) training algorithm; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BACKPROPAGATION; NEURAL NETWORKS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PATTERN MATCHING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

CONFINED AQUIFER PARAMETERS; LEVENBERG-MARQUARDT (LM) TRAINING ALGORITHM;

AQUIFERS;

ALGORITHMS; AQUIFERS; BACKPROPAGATION; NEURAL NETWORKS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PATTERN MATCHING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALGORITHM; AQUIFER; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 34249898039     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aziz A.R.A., and Wong K.V. A neural-network approach to the determination of aquifer parameters. Ground Water 30 2 (1992) 164-166
2. Balkhair K.S. Aquifer parameters determination for large diameter wells using neural network approach. Journal of Hydrology 265 1-4 (2002) 118-128
3. Clair T.A., and Ehrman J.M. Variation in discharge dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen export form terrestrial basins with changes in climate: a neural network approach. Limnology Oceanography 41 (1996) 921-927
4. Coulibaly P., Anctil F., Aravena R., and Bobee B. Artificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations. Water Resources Research 37 4 (2001) 885-896
5. Daliakopoulos I.N., Coulibaly P., and Tsanis I.K. Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrology 309 1-4 (2005) 229-240
6. Dayhoff J.E. Neural Network Architectures (1990), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
7. Everitt B.S., and Dunn G. Applied Multivariate Data Analysis (1992), Oxford University Press, New York
8. Fausett L. Fundamentals of neural networks (1994), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
9. Garcia L.A., and Shigidi A. Using neural networks for parameter estimation in ground water. Journal of Hydrology 318 1-4 (2006) 215-231
10. Gumrah F., Oz B., Guler B., and Evin S. The application of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality of polluted aquifer. Water Air and Soil Pollution 119 1-4 (2000) 275-294
11. Haan C.T. Statistical Methods in Hydrology (1977), Iowa State University Press 378 pp.
12. Hagan M.T., Demuth H.B., and Beale M.H. Neural Network Design (1996), PWS, Boston, MA
13. Hsu K.L., Gupta H.V., and Sorooshian S. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resources Research 31 10 (1995) 2517-2530
14. Jackson J.E. A User's Guide to Principal Components (1991), Wiley, New York
15. Jolliffe I.T. Principal Component Analysis (1986), Springer, New York
16. Kruseman G.P., and de Ridder N.A. Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data (1992), ILRI, Netherlands
17. Lallahem S., Mania J., Hani A., and Najjar Y. On the use of neural networks to evaluate groundwater levels in fractured media. Journal of Hydrology 307 1-4 (2005) 92-111
18. Lin G.F., and Chen L.H. A spatial interpolation method based on radial basis function networks incorporating a semivariogram model. Journal of Hydrology 288 3-4 (2004) 288-298
19. Lin G.F., and Chen L.H. A non-linear rainfall-runoff model using radial basis function network. Journal of Hydrology 289 1-4 (2004) 1-8
20. Lin G.F., and Chen G.R. An improved neural network approach to the determination of aquifer parameters. Journal of Hydrology 316 1-4 (2006) 281-289
21. Maier H.R., and Dandy G.C. The use of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality parameters. Water Resources Research 32 4 (1996) 1013-1022
22. Maier H.R., and Dandy G.C. Empirical comparison of various methods for training feed-forward neural networks for salinity forecasting. Water Resources Research 32 8 (1999) 2591-2596
23. Maier H.R., and Dandy G.C. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modeling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling and Software 15 (2000) 101-124
24. MATLAB, Release 14, 2004, by the Math Works, Inc.
25. McCulloch W., and Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5 (1943) 113-115
26. Meglen R.R. Examining large databases: a chemometric approach using Principal Component Analysis. Mar. Chem. 39 (1992) 17-237
27. Poff N.L., Tokar S., and Johnson P. Stream hydrological and ecological responses to climate change assessed with an artificial neural network. Limnology Oceanography 41 (1996) 857-863
28. Rizzo D.M., and Dougherty D.E. Characterization of aquifer properties using artificial neural network: neural kriging. Water Resources Research 30 2 (1994) 483-497
29. Rogers L.L., and Dowla F.U. Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural network with parallel solute transport modeling. Water Resources Research 30 2 (1994) 457-481
30. Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.R., and Williams R.J. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart D.E., and David E. (Eds). Parallel Distributed Processing (1986), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 318-362
31. Shamseldin A.Y. Application of a neural network technique to rainfall-runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology, Amsterdam 199 (1997) 272-294
32. Theis C.V. The relationship between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground-water storage. Transactions American Geophysical Union 16 (1935) 519-524
33. Todd D.K., and Mays L.W. Groundwater Hydrology (2005), Wiley, New York
34. Toth E., Brath A., and Montanari A. Comparison of short-term rainfall prediction models for real-time flood forecasting. Journal of Hydrology 239 (2000) 132-147
35. Walton W.C. Leaky artesian aquifer conditions in Illinois (1962), Illinois State Water Survey, Illinois
36. Wit, K.E., 1963. The hydraulic characteristics of the Oude Korendijk podler, calculated from pumping test data and laboratory measurements of core samples (in Dutch). Inst. Land and Water Manag. Res., Wageningen, Report No. 190, 24 pp.
37. Wold S., Esbensen K., and Geladi P. Principal component analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. (1987) 37-52
38. Zio E. Approaching the inverse problem of parameter estimation in groundwater models by means of artificial neural networks. Progress in Nuclear Energy 31 3 (1997) 303-315
39. Zitko V. Principal component analysis in the evaluation of environmental data. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 23 4 (1994) 718-722