Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 198, Issue 1-4, 1997, Pages 69-97

  Refsgaard, Jens Christian ^a  

^a DHI   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; DISTRIBUTED MODEL; HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; MIKE SHE; PARAMETERIZATION; VALIDATION;

DENMARK, KARUP CATCHMENT;

DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELS;

HYDROLOGY;

EID: 0030616293     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03329-X     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abbott, M.B., Bathurst, J.C., Cunge, J.A., O'Connel, P.E., Rasmussen, J., 1986a. An introduction to the European Hydrological System-Systeme Hydrologique "SHE", 1: history and philosophy of a physically based distributed modelling system. Journal of Hydrology 87, 45-59.
2. Abbott, M.B., Bathurst, J.C., Cunge, J.A., O'Connel, P.E., Rasmussen, J., 1986b. An introduction to the European Hydrological System-Systeme Hydrologique "SHE"', 2: structure of a physically based distributed modelling system. Journal of Hydrology 87, 61-77.
3. Anderson, M.P., Woessner, W.W., 1992. The role of postaudit in model validation. Advances in Water Resources 15, 167-173.
4. Bathurst, J.C. and O'Connell, P.E., 1992. Future of distributed modelling: the Systeme Hydrologique Europeen. Hydrological Processes 6 (3), 265-277.
5. Bergström, S., 1991. Principles and confidence in hydrological modelling. Nordic Hydrology 22, 123-156.
6. Beven, K., 1989. Changing ideas in hydrology - the case of physically based models. Journal of Hydrology 105, 157-172.
7. Beven, K.J., 1996. A discussion of distributed hydrological modelling. In: Abbott, M.S., Refsgaard, J.C. (Eds.), Distributed Hydrological Modelling. Kluwer Academic, pp. 255-278.
8. Beven, K., Calver, A., Morris, E.M., 1987. The Institute of Hydrology distributed model. Institute of Hydrology Report 98. Wallingford, UK.
9. Beven, K.J., Lamb, R., Quinn, P., Romanowicz, R., Freer, R., 1995. TOPMODEL. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.), Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, pp. 627-668.
10. Brooks, R.H., Corey, A.T., 1964. Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrology Paper 3. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 27 pp.
11. Burnash, R.J.C., 1995. The NWS river forecast system-catchment modelling. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.), Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, pp. 311-366.
12. Crawford, N.H., Linsley, R.K., 1966. Digital simulation in hydrology, Stanford Watershed Model IV. Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Technical Report 39.
13. De Marsily, G., Combes, P., Goblet, P., 1992. Comments on "Ground-water models cannot be validated", by L.F. Konikow and J.D. Bredehoeft. Advances in Water Resources 15, 367-369.
14. Fleming, G., 1975. Computer Simulation Techniques in Hydrology. Elsevier, New York.
15. Freeze, R.A., Harlan, R.L., 1969. Blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response model. Journal of Hydrology 9, 237-258.
16. Grayson, R.B., Moore, I.D., McHahon, T.A., 1992a. Physically based hydrologic modelling. 1. A terrain-based model for investigative purposes. Water Resources Research 28 (10), 2639-2658.
17. Grayson, R.B., Moore, I.D., McHahon, T.A., 1992b. Physically based hydrologic modelling. 2. Is the concept realistic? Water Resources Research 28 (10), 2639-2658.
18. Grayson, R.B., Blöschl, G., Moore, I.D., 1995. Distributed parameter hydrologic modelling using vector elevation data: THALES and TAPES-C. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.), Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, pp. 669-696.
19. Hansen, M., Gravesen, P., 1990. Geologiste forhold i oplandene til Karup Å og Rabis Bæk, Fylland. (Geological conditions in the catchments of Karup stream and Rabis creek, Jutland). National Agency of Environmental Protection, Geological Survey of Denmark. Internal report no. 35 (in Danish).
20. Hassanizadeh, S.M., Carrera, J., 1992. Editorial. Validation of Geo-hydrological Models (special issue). Advances in Water Resources 15, 1-3.
21. IAHR, 1994. Publication of guidelines for validation documents and call for discussion. International Association for Hydraulic Research Bulletin 11, 41.
22. Jain, S.K., Storm, B., Bathurst, J.C., Refsgaard, J.C., Singh, R.D., 1992. Application of the SHE to catchments in India. Part 2. Field experiments and simulation studies with the SHE on the Kolar subcatchment of the Narmada River. Journal of Hydrology 140, 25-47.
23. Klemes, V., 1986. Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrological Sciences Journal 31 (1), 13-24.
24. Konikow, L.F., Bredehoeft, J.D., 1992. Ground-water models cannot be validated. Advances in Water Resources 15, 75-83.
25. Michaud, J., Sorooshian, S., 1994. Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed. Water Resources Research 21 (2), 593-605.
26. Miljøstyrelsen, 1983. Karup river investigation. An investigation of the hydrological impacts of irrigation. Miljøprojekter 51. National Agency of Environmental Protection and the counties of Viborg, Ringkjøbing and Århus (in Danish).
27. Miljøstyrelsen, 1991. Nitrogen and phosphorous in groundwater: project abstracts of the Danish NPo research programme. National Agency of Environmental Protection, Copenhagen.
28. Nash, I.E., Sutcliffe, I.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part I. Journal of Hydrology 10, 282-290.
29. Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., Belitz, K., 1994. Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 264, 641-646.
30. Refsgaard, J.C., 1996. Terminology, modelling protocol and classification of hydrological model codes. In: Abbott, M.B., Refsgaard, J.C. (Eds.), Distributed Hydrological Modelling. Kluwer Academic, pp. 17-39.
31. Refsgaard, J.C., Seth, S.M., Bathurst, J.C., Erlich, M., Storm, B., Jørgensen, G.H., Chandra., S, 1992. Application of the SHE to catchments in India. Part 1. General results. Journal of Hydrology 140, 1-23.
32. Refsgaard, J.C., Storm, B., 1995. MIKE SHE. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.), Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, pp. 809-846.
33. Refsgaard, J.C., Storm, B., 1996. Construction, calibration and validation of hydrological models. In: Abbott, M.B., Refsgaard, J.C. (Eds.), Distributed Hydrological Modelling. Kluwer Academic, pp. 41-54.
34. Refsgaard, J.C., Knudsen, J., 1996. Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resources Research 32 (7), 2189-2202.
35. Rosso, R., 1994. An introduction to spatially distributed modelling of basin response. In: Rosso, R., Peano, A., Becchi, I., Bemporad, G.A. (Eds.), Advances in Distributed Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, pp. 3-30.
36. Schlesinger, S., Crosbie, R.E., Gagné, R.E., Innis, G.S., Lalwani, C.S., Loch, J., Sylvester, J., Wright, R.D., Kheir, N., Bartos, D., 1979. Terminology for model credibility. SCS Technical Committee on Model Credibility. Simulation 32 (3), 103-104.
37. Sorooshian, S., Duan, Q., Gupta, V.K., 1993. Calibration of rainfall-runoff models: application of global optimization to the Sacramento soil moisture accounting model. Water Resources Research 29, 1185-1194.
38. Stephenson, G.R., Freeze, R.A., 1974. Mathematical simulation of subsurface flow contributions to snowmelt runoff, Reynolds Creek Watershed, Idaho. Water Resources Research 10 (2), 284-293.
39. Storm, B., Refsgaard, J.C., 1980. Integrated surface/subsurface model for the Karup catchment. Proceedings of the Nordic Hydrological Conference, Vemdalen, Sweden, pp. 383-395.
40. Stendal, M.M., 1978. Hydrological data - Norden, Karup representative basin, Denmark. Data Volume 1965-77. Danish National Committee for the IHD, Copenhagen.
41. Styczen, M., Storm, B., 1993. Modelling of N-movements on catchment scale - a tool for analysis and decision making. 1. Model description and 2. A case study. Fertilizer Research 36, 1-17.
42. Tsang, C.-F., 1991. The modelling process and model validation. Ground Water 29, 825-831.
43. WMO (World Meteorological Association), 1975. Intercomparison of conceptual models used in operational hydrological forecasting. WMO Operational Hydrology Report No. 7, WMO No. 429. World Meteorological Organisation, Geneva.
44. WMO (World Meteorological Association), 1986. Intercomparison of models for snowmelt runoff. WMO Operational Hydrology Report No. 23, WMO No. 646. World Meteorological Association, Geneva.
45. WMO (World Meteorological Association), 1992. Simulated real-time intercomparison of hydrological models. WMO Operational Hydrology Report No. 38, WMO No. 779. World Meteorological Association, Geneva.