Geostatistical inversion of coupled problems: Dealing with computational burden and different types of data

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 281, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 251-264

  Medina, Agustín ^a   Carrera, Jesús ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Computational burden; Geostatistical inversion; Jacobian matrices

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; COSTS; GROUNDWATER; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

SENSITIVITY EQUATIONS;

HYDROLOGY;

EFFICIENCY; FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; STOCHASTIC METHOD;

EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; FLOW MODELING; GEOSTATISTICS; GROUNDWATER FLOW;

EID: 0142214703     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00190-2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Akaike, H., 1978. A new look at the Bayes procedure. Biometrika 65 (1), 53-59.
2. Capilla, J.E., Gómez-Hernández, J., Sahuquillo, A., 1997. Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data 2. Demonstration on a synthetic aquifer. Journal of hydrology 203 (1-4), 175-188.
3. Capilla, J.E., Rodrigo, J., Gómez-Hernández, J.J., 1999. Simulation of non-Gaussian transmissivity fields honoring piezometric data and integrating soft and secondary information. Mathematical Geology 31 (7), 907-927.
4. Carrera, J., 1987. State of the art of inverse problem applied to the flow and solute transport equations. In: Custodio, E., Gurguí, A., Lobo Ferreira, J.P. (Eds.), Groundwater Flow and Quality Modeling, Dordrecht-Reidel, pp. 273-283.
5. Carrera, J., 1994. INVERT-4. A Fortran program for solving the groundwater flow inverse problem. User's guide. CIMNE. Technical Report, 160pp. + appendices, Barcelona, Spain.
6. Carrera, J., Glorioso, L., 1991. On geostatistical formulations of the groundwater flow inverse problem. Advances in Water Resources 14 (5), 273-283.
7. Carrera, J., Medina, A., 1994. An improved form of adjoint-state equations for transient problems. In: Peters, A., Wittun G., Herrling, B., Meissner, U., Brebbia, C.A., Gray, W.G., Pinder, G.F. (Eds.), X International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources, Kluwer Academic.
8. Carrera, J., Neuman, S.P., 1986a. Estimation of aquifer parameters under steady-state and transient conditions I. Background and statistical framework. Water Resources Research 22 (2), 199-210.
9. Carrera, J., Neuman, S.P., 1986b. Estimation of aquifer parameters under steady-state and transient conditions II. Uniqueness, stability and solution algorithms. Water Resources Research 22 (2), 211-227.
10. Clifton, P.M., Neuman, S.P., 1982. Effects of kriging and inverse modeling on conditional simulation of the Avra Valley aquifer in southern Arizona. Water Resources Research 18 (4), 1215-1234.
11. Cooley, R.L., 1982. Incorporation of prior information on parameters into non-linear regression groundwater-flow models. 1. Theory. Water Resources Research 18 (4), 965-976.
12. Cooley, R.L., 1985. A comparison of several methods of solving nonlinear-regression groundwater-flow problems. Water Resources Research 21 (10), 1525-1538.
13. Dagan, G., 1985. Stochastic modeling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities: the inverse problem. Water Resources Research 21 (1), 65-72.
14. Dautray, R., Lions, J.L., 1988. Analyse mathematique et calcul numérique pour les sciences et les techniques. Ed. Masson.
15. Gómez-Hernández, J.J., 1991. A Stochastic approach to the simulation of block conductivity fields conditioned upon data measured at a smaller scale. PhD Dissertation, Department of Applied Sciences, Stanford University, California, USA.
16. Gómez-Hernández, J.J., Sahuquillo, A., Capilla, J., 1997. Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmisivity and piezometric data. I Theory. Journal of Hydrology 203 (1-4), 162-174.
17. Hill, M.C., Cooley, R.L., Pollock, D.W., 1998. A controlled experiment in ground water flow model calibration. Ground Water 36 (3), 520-535.
18. Hoeksema, R.J., Kitanidis, P.K., 1984. An application of the geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in two-dimensional groundwater modeling. Water Resources Research 20 (7), 1003-1020.
19. Hoeksema, R.J., Kitanidis, P.K., 1985. Comparison of Gaussian conditional mean and kriging estimation in the geostatistical solution of the inverse problem. Water Resources Research 21 (6), 825-836.
20. Honjo, Y., Wen-Tsung, L., Sakajo, S., 1994. Aplication of Akaike information criterion statistics to geotechnical inverse analysis: the extended Bayesian method. Structural Safety 14, 5-29.
21. Kitanidis, P.K., 1995. Quasi-linear geostatistical theory for inversing. Water Resources Research 31 (10), 2411-2419.
22. Kitanidis, P.K., Vomvoris, E.G., 1983. A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady-state) and one dimensional simulations. Water Resources Research 19 (3), 677-690.
23. McLaughlin, D., Townley, L.R., 1996. A reassesment of the groundwater inverse problem. Water Resources Research 32 (5), 1131-1161.
24. Medina, A., Carrera, J., 1996. Coupled estimation of flow and solute transport parameters. Water Resources Research 32 (10), 3063-3076.
25. Neuman, S.P., 1973. Calibration of distributed parameter groundwater flow model viewed as a multiple objective decision process under uncertainty. Water Resources Research 9 (4), 1006-1021.
26. Neuman, S.P., Yakowitz, S., 1979. A statistical approach to the inverse problems of aquifer hydrology. 1. Theory. Water Resources Research 15 (4), 845-860.
27. Rubin, Y., Dagan, G., 1987. Stochastic identification of transmissivity and effective recharge in steady groundwater flow: I. Theory. Water Resources Research 23 (7), 1185-1192.
28. Sadeghipur, J., Yen, W.W.-G., 1984. Parameter identification of groundwater aquifer models. A generalized least squares approach. Water Resources Research 20 (7), 971-979.
29. Sahuquillo, A., Capilla, J., Gómez-Hernández, J.J., Andreu, J., 1992. Conditional simulation of transmissivity fields honouring piezometric data. In: Blain, W.R., Cabrera, E. (Eds.), Fluid Flow Modeling, Comput Mech, Billerica, MA, pp. 201-212.
30. Sun, N.Z., Yeh, W.W.G., 1992. A stochastic inverse solution for transient groundwater flow: parameter identification and reliability analysis. Water Resources Research 28 (12), 3269-3280.
31. Townley, L.R., Wilson, J.L., 1985. Computationally efficient algorithms for parameter estimation and uncertainty propagation in numerical models. Water Resources Research 21 (12), 1851-1860.
32. Yeh, W.W.G., 1986. Review of parameter identification procedures in groundwater hydrology. The inverse problem. Water Resources Research 22 (2), 95-108.
33. Yeh, T.C.J., Jin, M., Hanna, S., 1996. An iterative stochastic inverse method: conditional effective transmissivity and hydraulic head fields. Water Resources Research 32 (1), 85-92.
34. Zimmerman, D.A., de Marsily, G., Gotway, C.A., Marrietta, M.G., Axness, C.L., Beauheim, R.L., Bras, R.L., Carrera, J., Dagan, G., Davies, P.B., Gallegos, D.P., Galli, A., Gómez-Hornández, J., Grindrod, P., Gutjahr, A.L., Kitanidis, P.K., Lavenue, A.M., Mc Laughlin, D., Neuman, S.P., Ramarao, B.S., Ravenne, C., Rubin, Y., 1998. Comparison of seven geostatistically-based inverse approaches to estimate transmissivities for modeling advective transport by groundwater flow. Water Resources Research 34 (6), 1373-1413