Conditioning mean study state flow on hydraulic head and conductivity through geostatistical inversion

Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 329-338

  Hernandez, A F ^a   Neuman, S P ^a   Guadagnini, A ^b   Carrera, J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aquifer characteristics; Geostatistics; Groundwater flow; Inverse problem; Regression analysis; Steady state conditions; Stochastic processes; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER CHARACTERIZATION; GEOSTATISTICS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULIC HEAD;

EID: 0345953611     PISSN: 14363240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-003-0154-4     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Carrera J, Neuman SP (1986) Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 1. Maximum likelihood method incorporating prior information. Wat. Resour. Res. 22(2): 199-210
2. Chilès JP, Delfiner P (1999) Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty. Wiley, New York.
3. De Marsily G, Lavedan C, Bouchere M, Fasanino G (1984) Interpretation of interference tests in a well field using geostatistical techniques to fit the permeability distribution in a reservoir model. In: Verly G, David M, Journel AG, Marechal A (Eds) Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization, Part 2, NATO ASI Ser., C, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, vol. 182: 831-849
4. De Marsily G (1978) De l'identification des systèmes hydrogèologiques (On the identification of hydrologeological systems). Ph.D. Thesis. Univ. Paris VI
5. Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. 2nd edn. Oxford Univ. Press, New York
6. Doherty J (2002) PEST: Model Independent Parameter Estimation. User Manual. 4th Edn. Watermark Numerical Computing, Australia
7. Gómez-Hernández JJ, Sahuiquillo A, Capilla JE (1997) Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data. 1. Theory. J. Hydrol. 203: 162-174
8. Guadagnini A, Neuman SP (1999a) Nonlocal and localized analyses of conditional mean steady state flow in bounded, randomly nonuniform domains: 1. Theory and computational approach. Wat. Resour. Res. 35(10): 2999-3018
9. Guadagnini A, Neuman SP (1999b) Nonlocal and localized analyses of conditional mean steady state flow in bounded, randomly nonuniform domains: 2. Computational examples. Wat. Resour. Res. 35(10): 3019-3039
10. Hernandez AF (2002) Conditioning nonlocal steady-state flow on hydraulic head and conductivity through geostatistical inversion. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Arizona
11. Liu JWH (1987) A collection of routines for an implementation of the multifrontal method. Tech. Rep. CS-90-04. Department of Computer Science, York University, North York, Ontario, Canada
12. Neuman SP, Guadagnini A (2000) A new look at traditional deterministic flow models and their calibration in the context of randomly heterogeneous media. In: Stauffer F, Kinzelbach W, Kovar K, Hoehn E (Eds) Calibration and Reliability in Groundwater Modelling, (Proc. Int. Conf. ModelCARE'99, held 20-23 September 1999 in Zürich, Switzerland), PP. 213-221, IAHS Publ. No. 265
13. Neuman SP, Orr S (1993) Prediction of steady state flow in nonuniform geologic media by conditional moments: Exact nonlocal formalism, effective conductivities, and weak approximation. Wat. Resour. Res. 29(2): 341-364
14. Neuman SP, Tartakovsky DM, Wallstrom TC, Winter CL (1996) Correction to "Prediction of steady state flow in nonuniform geologic media by conditional moments: Exact nonlocal formalism, effective conductivities, and weak approximation". Wat. Resour. Res. 32(5): 1479-1480