Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data - I. Theory

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 203, Issue 1-4, 1997, Pages 162-174

  Gómez Hernánez, J Jaime ^a   Sahuquillo, Andrés ^a   Capilla, José E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Geostatistics; Self calibrated algorithm; Stochastic hydrogeology; Stochastic inversion

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; AQUIFERS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; HYDROLOGY; ITERATIVE METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; RANDOM PROCESSES; STATISTICS;

GEOSTATISTICS; PIEZOMETRIC HEAD; STEADY STATE FLOW; STOCHASTIC HYDROGEOLOGY; STOCHASTIC INVERSION; TRANSMISSIVITY FIELD;

GROUNDWATER FLOW;

AQUIFER; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; TRANSMISSIVITY;

AQUIFER; PEIZOMETRIC DATA; TRANSMISSIVITY;

EID: 0031593106     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00098-X     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ababou, R., Gelhar, L. W., McLaughlin, D., 1988. Three-dimensional flow in random porous media. Technical Report no. 318 of the Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2. Alabert, F.G., 1987. Stochastic imaging of spatial distributions using hard and soft data. Master's thesis. Branner Earth Sciences Library, Stanford University, CA.
3. Capilla, J.E., Rodrigo, J., Gomez-Hernandez, J.J., Geostatistical structure of simulated transmissivity fields that honour piezometric data, in: Proceedings of IAMG 97, Barcelona, 1997.
4. Carrera, J., 1984. Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady-state conditions. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona.
5. Carrera, J., Neuman, S.P., 1986. Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions, 1. Maximum likelihood method incorporating prior information, Water Resour. Res., 22 (2), 199-210.
6. Carrera, J., Navarrina, F., Vives, L., Heredia, J., Medina, A., 1990. Computational aspects of the inverse problem. In: G. Gambolati et al. (Eds.), Computational Methods in Surface Hydrology. Southampton, Boston. Computational Mechanics Publications.
7. Chavent, G., Dupuy, M., Lemonier, P., 1986. History matching by use of optimal theory, SPE J., 15(1), 74-86.
8. Cottle, R.W., 1968. Complementary pivot theory of mathematical programming, Linear Algebra Appl., 1, 103-125.
9. Dagan, G., 1985. Stochastic modelling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities, 2. The inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 21 (4), 573-578.
10. Dantzig, G.B., 1963. Linear Programming and Extensions. Princenton University Press, Princenton, NJ.
11. de Marsily, G., Lavedu, G., Boucher, M., Fadanino, G., 1984. Interpretation of interference test in a well field using geostatistical techniques to fit the permeability distribution in a reservoir model. In: G.W. Verly, M. David, A. Journel, A. Marechal (Eds.), Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterizations, pp. 831-849. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, South Lake Tahoe, CA, 6-17 September, Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.
12. Delhomme, J.P., 1979. Spatial variability and uncertainty in groundwater flow parameters: a geostatistical approach, Water Resour. Res., 15 (2), 269-280.
13. Freeze, R.A., 1975. A stochastic-conceptual analysis of one-dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform heterogeneous media, Water Resour. Res., 11 (5), 725.
14. Ginn, T.R., Chushman, J.H., 1990. Inverse method for subsurface flow: a critical review of stochastic techniques, Stoch. Hydrol, Hydraul., 4, 1-26.
15. Gómez-Hernández, J.J., 1991. A stochastic approach to the simulation of block conductivity values conditioned upon data measured at a smaller scale. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
16. Gómez-Hernández. J.J., Wen, X.-H., 1998. To be or not to be multigaussian: a reflection in stochastic hydrogeology, Adv. Water Resour., 21 (1), 47-61.
17. Gómez-Hernández, J.J., Gorelick, S.M., 1989. Effective groundwater model parameter values: influence of spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity, leakance and recharge. Water Resour. Res., 25 (3), 405-419.
18. Gómez-Hernändez, J.J., Srivastava, R.M., 1990. ISIM3D: an ANSI-C three-dimensional multiple indicator conditional simulation program, Comput. Geosci., 16 (4), 395-440.
19. Gómez-Henrnández, J.J., Journel, A.G., 1993. Joint simulation of multiGaussian random variables, tn: A, Soares (Ed.), Geostatistics Tróia '92, Vol. 1, pp. 85-94. Kluwer, Dorcrecht.
20. Gómez-Hernández, J.J., Cassiraga, E.F., 1994. Theory and practice of sequential simulation. In Amstrong, M., Dowd, P. (Eds.), Geostatistical Simulations, pp. 111-121. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
21. Goode, D.J., Appel, C.A., 1992. Finite-difference interblock transmissivity for unconrined aquifers and for aquifers having smoothly varying transmissivity. Water-resources investigations report 92-4124, U.S.G.S., Menlo Park, CA.
22. Gutjahr, A., Bullard, B., Hatch, S., Hughson, L., 1994. Joint conditional simulation and the spectral method approach for flow modelling, Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraul., 8(1), 79-108.
23. Hoeksema, R.J., Kitanidis. P.K., 1984. An application of the geostatical approach to the inverse problem in two-dimensional groundwater modelling, Water Resour. Res., 20 (7), 1003-1020.
24. Hoeksema, R.J., Kitanidis, P.K., 1985. Analysis of the spatial structure of properties of selected aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 21 (4), 563-572.
25. Indelman, P., Dagan, G., 1993. Upscaling of permeability of anisotropic heterogeneous formations, 1. The general framework., Water Resour. Res., 29 (4), 917-924.
26. lsaaks, E.H., 1990. The application of Monte-Carlo methods to the analysis of spatially correlated data. Ph.D. thesis. Branner Earth Sciences Library, Stanford University.
27. Journel, A.G., 1974. Geostatistics for conditional simulation of ore bodies, Econ. Geol., 69 (5), 673-687.
28. Journel, A.G., 1989. Fundamentals of Geostatistics in Five Lessons, Vol. 8 of Short Courses in Geology. AGU, Washington DC.
29. Journel, A.G., Alabert, F., 1989. Non-gaussian data expansion in the earth sciences, Terra Nova, 1 (2), 123-134.
30. Kitanidis, P.K., Vomvoris, E.G., 1993. A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modelling (steady state) and one-dimensional simulations. Water Resour. Res., 19 (3), 677-690.
31. Lachassagne, P., Ledoux, E., deMarsily, G., 1989. Evaluation of hydrogeological parameters in heterogeneous porous media. In Sahuquillo, A., Andréu, J., O'Donnell, T. (Eds.), Groundwater Management: Quantity and Quality, No. 188 in IAHS Publication, pp. 3-18. International association of Hydrological Sciences.
32. Matheron, G.F., 1967. Éléments pour une Théorie des Milieux Poreux. Mason et Cie.
33. McLaughlin, D., Townley, L.R., 1996. A reassessment of the groundwater inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 32 (5), 1131-1162.
34. Ramarao, B.S., LaVenue, A.M., de Marsily, G., Marietta, M.G., 1995. Pilot point methodology for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated transmissivity fields, 1. Theory and computational experiments, Water Resour. Res., 31 (3), 475-493.
35. Rosen, J.B., Mangasrian, O.L., Ritter, K., 1970. Nonlinear Programming. Academic, New York.
36. Rubin, Y., Dagan, G., 1987. Stochastic identification of transmissivity and effective recharge in steady groundwuter flow, I. Theory. , Water Resour. Res., 23 (7). 1185-1191.
37. Rubin, Y., Dagan, G., 1987. Stochastic identification of transmissivity and effective recharge in steady groundwater flow, 2, Case study., Water Resour. Res., 23 (7), 1185-1200.
38. Rubin. Y., Gómez-Hernández, J.J., 1990. A stochastic approach to the problem of upscaling of conductivity in disordered media. Theory and unconditional numerical simulations. Water Resour. Res., 26 (4), 691-701.
39. Sahuquiilo. A., Capilla. J.E., Gomez-Hernandez, J.J., Andreu, J., 1992. Conditional simulation of transmissivity fields honouring piezometric head data. In: W.R. Blair. E. Cabrera (Eds.). Hydraulic engineering Software IV, Fluid Flow Modelling, Vol. II, pp. 201-214. Elsevier, Oxford.
40. Smith, L., Freeze, R.A., 1979. Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain, 1. One-dimensional simulations. Water Resour. Res., 15 (3), 521-528.
41. Smitn, L., Freeze, R.A., 1979. Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain, 2. Two-dimensional simulations. Water Resour. Res., 15 (6), 1543-1559.
42. Sun, N.-Z., 1994. Inverse Problems in Groundwater Modelling. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
43. Wagner, B.J., Gorelick, S.M., 1987. Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty. Water Resour. Res., 23 (7), 1162-1 174.
44. Wagner. B., Gorelick, S.M., 1989. Reliable aquifer remediation in the presence of spatially variable hydraulic conductivity: from data to design, Water Resour. Res., 25 ( 10), 2211-2226.
45. Wen, X.-H., Gomez-Hernandez, J. J., 1996. Upscaling hydraulic conductivities: an overview, J. Hydrol., 183 (1-2). ix-xxxii.
46. Wolfe, P., 1959. The simplex method for quadratic programming, Econometrica, 27, 382-398.
47. Yeh, W.W.-G., 1986. Review of parameter identification procedures in groundwater hydrology: the inverse problem. Water Resour. Res., 22 (2), 95-108.
48. Zimmerman, D.A., Gallegos, D.P., 1993. A comparison of geoststistically based inverse techniques for use in performance assessments analyses at the WIPP site. Results from test case no 1. In: High Level Radioactive Waste Management, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference., pp. 1426-1436. Las Vegas, NV.
49. Zimmerman, D.A., Axness, C.L., de Marsily, G., Marietta. M.G., Gotway, C.A., 1994. Results from a comparison of geostatistical inverse techniques for groundwater flow. In: Proceedings from Inverse Method Workshop. Karlsruhe, Germany.