Nucleosome stability dramatically impacts the targeting of somatic hypermutation

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2030-2040

  Kodgire, Prashant ^a   Mukkawar, Priyanka ^a   North, Justin A ^b   Poirier, Michael G ^b   Storb, Ursula ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOGLOBULIN; MP2 PROTEIN; PROTEIN; RNA POLYMERASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME ANALYSIS; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATIC HYPERMUTATION;

ANIMALS; B-LYMPHOCYTES; CELL LINE; CHICKENS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; DNA REPAIR; ENZYME ACTIVATION; GENES, IMMUNOGLOBULIN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN VARIABLE REGION; NUCLEOSOMES; SOMATIC HYPERMUTATION, IMMUNOGLOBULIN;

EID: 84861371523     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.06722-11     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson JD, Widom J. 2000. Sequence and position-dependence of the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites. J. Mol. Biol. 296:979-987.
2. Arakawa H, Saribasak H, Buerstedde JM. 2004. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase initiates immunoglobulin gene conversion and hypermutation by a common intermediate. PLoS Biol. 2:E179.
3. Betz AG, et al. 1994. Elements regulating somatic hypermutation of an immunoglobulin kappa gene: critical role for the intron enhancer/matrix attachment region. Cell 77:239-248.
4. Chaudhuri J, et al. 2003. Transcription-targeted DNA deamination by the AID antibody diversification enzyme. Nature 422:726-730.
5. Clapier CR, Cairns BR. 2009. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78:273-304.
6. Conley ME, et al. 2009. Primary B cell immunodeficiencies: comparisons and contrasts. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27:199-227.
7. Das C, Tyler JK, Churchill ME. 2010. The histone shuffle: histone chaperones in an energetic dance. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35:476-489.
8. Dickerson SK, Market E, Besmer E, Papavasiliou FN. 2003. AID mediates hypermutation by deaminating single stranded DNA. J. Exp. Med. 197:1291-1296.
9. Fritz EL, Papavasiliou FN. 2010. Cytidine deaminases: AIDing DNA demethylation? Genes Dev. 24:2107-2114.
10. Gaykalova DA, et al. 2011. A polar barrier to transcription can be circumvented by remodeler-induced nucleosome translocation. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:3520-3528.
11. Gracey LE, et al. 2010. An in vitro-identified high-affinity nucleosomepositioning signal is capable of transiently positioning a nucleosome in vivo. Epigenetics Chromatin 3:13.
12. Hochedlinger K, Plath K. 2009. Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency. Development 136:509-523.
13. Jin J, et al. 2010. Synergistic action of RNA polymerases in overcoming the nucleosomal barrier. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17:745-752.
14. Li G, Levitus M, Bustamante C, Widom J. 2005. Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12:46-53.
15. Li G, Widom J. 2004. Nucleosomes facilitate their own invasion. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11:763-769.
16. Locke G, Tolkunov D, Moqtaderi Z, Struhl K, Morozov AV. 2010. High-throughput sequencing reveals a simple model of nucleosome energetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:20998-21003.
17. Lowary PT, Widom J. 1998. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 276:19-42.
18. Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. 1997. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 389:251-260.
19. Manohar M, et al. 2009. Acetylation of histone H3 at the nucleosome dyad alters DNA-histone binding. J. Biol. Chem. 284:23312-23321.
20. Michael N, et al. 2002. Effects of sequence and structure on the hypermutability of immunoglobulin genes. Immunity 16:123-134.
21. Morgan HD, Dean W, Coker HA, Reik W, Petersen-Mahrt SK. 2004. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates 5-methylcytosine in DNA and is expressed in pluripotent tissues: implications for epigenetic reprogramming. J. Biol. Chem. 279:52353-52360.
22. Morozov AV, et al. 2009. Using DNA mechanics to predict in vitro nucleosome positions and formation energies. Nucleic Acids Res. 37: 4707-4722.
23. Partensky PD, Narlikar GJ. 2009. Chromatin remodelers act globally, sequence positions nucleosomes locally. J. Mol. Biol. 391:12-25.
24. Perez-Duran P, de Yebenes VG, Ramiro AR. 2007. Oncogenic events triggered by AID, the adverse effect of antibody diversification. Carcinogenesis 28:2427-2433.
25. Peters A, Storb U. 1996. Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes is linked to transcription initiation. Immunity 4:57-65.
26. Pfaffl MW. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:e45.
27. Pham P, Bransteitter R, Petruska J, Goodman MF. 2003. Processive AID-catalysed cytosine deamination on single-stranded DNA simulates somatic hypermutation. Nature 424:103-107.
28. Poirier MG, Bussiek M, Langowski J, Widom J. 2008. Spontaneous access to DNA target sites in folded chromatin fibers. J. Mol. Biol. 379: 772-786.
29. Polach KJ, Widom J. 1995. Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 254:130-149.
30. Popp C, et al. 2010. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 463:1101-1105.
31. Rai K, et al. 2008. DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and gadd45. Cell 135:1201-1212.
32. Segal E, et al. 2006. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442:772-778.
33. Shen HM, et al. 2009. The activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) efficiently targets DNA in nucleosomes but only during transcription. J. Exp. Med. 206:1057-1071.
34. Shen HM, Ratnam S, Storb U. 2005. Targeting of the activation-induced cytosine deaminase is strongly influenced by the sequence and structure of the targeted DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:10815-10821.
35. Simpson RT, Stafford DW. 1983. Structural features of a phased nucleosome core particle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80:51-55.
36. Smith CL, Peterson CL. 2005. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 65:115-148.
37. Storb U, Shen HM, Nicolae D. 2009. Somatic hypermutation: processivity of the cytosine deaminase AID and error-free repair of the resulting uracils. Cell Cycle 8:3097-3101.
38. Storck S, Aoufouchi S, Weill JC, Reynaud CA. 2011. AID and partners: for better and (not) for worse. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 23:337-344.
39. Studitsky VM, Clark DJ, Felsenfeld G. 1994. A histone octamer can step around a transcribing polymerase without leaving the template. Cell 76: 371-382.
40. Thastrom A, et al. 1999. Sequence motifs and free energies of selected natural and non-natural nucleosome positioning DNA sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 288:213-229.
41. Widlund HR, et al. 1997. Identification and characterization of genomic nucleosome-positioning sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 267:807-817.
42. Widom J. 1992. A relationship between the helical twist of DNA and the ordered positioning of nucleosomes in all eukaryotic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89:1095-1099.
43. Zhang Y, et al. 2009. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16:847-852.