Biobibliometric profiling: An examination of multifaceted approaches to scholarship

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 450-468

  Sugimoto, Cassidy R ^a   Cronin, Blaise ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACROSS TIME; COAUTHORSHIP; COLLABORATION PRACTICES; MULTI-FACETED APPROACH;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84857649061     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21695     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Abbott, A., (1999). Department and discipline: Chicago sociology at one hundred. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. Allen, T.J., (1977). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Ahuja, M., Herring, S., Ogan, C., &, Robinson, J., (2004). Exploring antecedents of gender equitable outcomes in IT higher education. Proceedings of the 2004 Special Interest Group of the ACM on Management Information Systems Conference on Computer Personnel Research: Careers, Culture, and Ethics in a Networked Environment (pp. 120-123).
4. Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE). (2004). Statistical report. Retrieved from
5. Baker, D.R., &, Wilson, M.V.K., (1992). An evaluation of the scholarly productivity of doctoral graduates. Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 204-212.
6. Bar-Ilan, J., (2006). An ego-centric citation analysis of the works of Michael O. Rabin based on multiple citation indexes. Information Processing & Management, 42, 1553-1566. (Pubitemid 43825592)
7. Bates, M.J., (2005, November). Acceptance speech for ASIST Award of Merit. Delivered at the Charlotte Westin Hotel, Charlotte, NC.
8. Bazerman, C., (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental articles in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
9. Biagioli, M., &, Galison, P., (2003). Scientific authorship: Credit and intellectual property in science. New York: Routledge.
10. Borgman, C.L., (Ed.). (1990). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Bornmann, L., &, Daniel, H.D., (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64 (1), 45-80.
12. Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., &, van den Besselaar, P., (2010). A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications. Journal of Infometrics, 4 (3), 211-220.
13. Bornmann, L., Marx, W., Schier, H., Rahm, E., Thor, A., &, Daniel, H.D., (2009). Convergent validity of Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry: Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts. Journal of Informetrics, 3 (1), 27-35.
14. Boyack, K.W., &, Jordan, P., (2011). Metrics associated with NIH funding: A high-level view. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18 (4), 423-431.
15. Carmichael, J.V. Jr., (1992). The male librarian and the feminine image: A survey of stereotype, status, and gender perceptions. Library & Information Science Research, 14 (4), 411-447.
16. Carmichael, J.V. Jr., (1994). Gender issues in the workplace: Male librarians tell their side. American Libraries, 25 (3), 227.
17. Carr, E.H., (1987). What is history ? (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin.
18. Castells, M., (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
19. Cheryan, S., &, Plaut, V.C., (2010). Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest. Sex Roles, 63, 475-488.
20. Cole, J.R., (2011, April 24). Too big to fail. How "better than nothing" defined the National Research Council's graduate ranking. Chronicle of Higher Education. Available at
21. Cronin, B., (1995). The scholar's courtesy: The role of acknowledgement in the primary communication process. London: Taylor Graham.
22. Cronin, B., (2002). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices ? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (7), 558-569. (Pubitemid 32471523)
23. Cronin, B., (2005a). Warm bodies, cold facts: The embodiment and emplacement of knowledge claims. In, P. Ingwersen, &, B. Larsen, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 1-12). Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska University Press.
24. Cronin, B., (2005b). The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
25. Cronin, B., (2008). On the epistemic significance of place. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (6), 1002-1006. (Pubitemid 351548477)
26. Cronin, B., &, Davenport, E., (1996). Conflicts of jurisdiction: An exploratory study of academic, professional, and epistemological norms in library and information science. Libri, 46 (1), 1-15. (Pubitemid 126779327)
27. Cronin, B., &, Meho, L.I., (2007). Timelines of creativity: A study of intellectual innovators in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (13), 1948-1959. (Pubitemid 350229700)
28. Cronin, B., &, Shaw, D., (1999). Citation, funding acknowledgement and author nationality relationships in four information science journals. Journal of Documentation, 55 (4), 402-408.
29. Cronin, B., &, Shaw, D., (2001). Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics, 54 (1), 31-49.
30. Cronin, B., &, Shaw, D., (2007). Peers and spheres of influence: Situating Rob Kling. The Information Society, 23 (4), 221-233.
31. Dickinson, T.E., (2002). Looking at the male librarian stereotype. Reference Librarian, 37 (78), 97-110. (Pubitemid 36452827)
32. Fox, M.F., &, Mohapatra, S., (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. Journal of Higher Education, 78 (5), 543-571.
33. Gaddis, J.L., (2004). The landscape of history. London: Oxford University Press.
34. Gieryn, T., (2002). Three truth-spots. Journal of History of the Behavioral Sciences, 38 (2), 113-132. (Pubitemid 41399671)
35. Gieryn, T., (2006). City as truth-spot: Laboratories and field-sites in urban studies. Social Studies of Science, 36 (1), 5-38. (Pubitemid 43549120)
36. Giles, C.L., &, Councill, I.G., (2004, December 21). Who gets acknowledged? Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101 (51), 17599-17604. (Pubitemid 40051932)
37. Girves, J.E., &, Wemmerus, V., (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. Journal of Higher Education, 59 (2), 163-189.
38. Gordon, R.S., (2004). The men among us. Library Journal, 129 (11), 49. (Pubitemid 38830309)
39. Greene, M., (2007). The demise of the lone author. Nature, 450 (7173), 1165-1165.
40. Greer, B., Stephens, D., &, Coleman, V., (2001). Cultural diversity and gender role spillover: A working perspective. Journal of Library Administration, 33 (1-2), 125-140.
41. Harris, R., &, Wilkinson, M.A., (2004). Situating gender: Students' perceptions of information work. Information Technology & People, 17 (1), 71-86.
42. Harter, S., &, Hooten, P., (1990). Factors affecting funding and citation rates in information science publications. Library & Information Science Research, 12 (3), 263-280.
43. Hartley, J., (2008). Academic writing and publishing. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
44. Heinrich, K.T., (1991). Loving partnerships: Dealing with sexual attraction and power in doctoral advisement relationships. Journal of Higher Education, 62 (5), 514-538.
45. Hickey, A., (2006). Cataloguing men: Charting the male librarian's experience through the perceptions and positions of men in libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32 (3), 286-295. (Pubitemid 43758012)
46. Hildenbrand, S., (1999). The information age vs. gender equity. Library Journal, 124 (7), 44-47.
47. Holland, A., (2007). Gender bias in libraries ? Library Journal, 132 (1), 64.
48. Howard, R.M., (1999). Standing in the shadow of giants: Plagiarists, authors, collaborators. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
49. Hyland, K., (2000). Disciplinary discourses. London, England: Longman.
50. Kraut, R., Egido, C., &, Galegher, J., (1988). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1-12).
51. Kyvik, S., (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2002. Scientometrics, 58 (1), 35-48. (Pubitemid 39109266)
52. Lamont, M., (2009). Gender, technology, and libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 28 (3), 137-142.
53. Larivière, V., (2010a, April 19). 50 years of information science viewed through the prism of bibliometrics. Presentation at the School of Information Studies, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Available from the author.
54. Larivière, V., (2010b). A bibliometric analysis of Quebec's PhD students' contributions to the advancement of knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
55. Leydesdorff, L., &, Wagner, C., (2009). Macro-level indicators of the relations between research funding and research output. Journal of Infometrics, 3 (4), 353-362.
56. Mählck, P., &, Persson, O., (2000). Socio-bibliometric mapping of intra-departmental networks. Scientometrics, 49 (1), 81-91.
57. Malmgren, R., Ottino, J., &, Amaral, L., (2010). The role of mentorship in protege performance. Nature, 465 (3), 622-627.
58. Moed, H.F., (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
59. Moya-Anegon, F., Herrero-Solana, V., &, Jimenez-Contreras, E., (2006). A connectionist and multivariate approach to science maps: The SOM, clustering and MDS applied to library science research and information. Journal of Information Science, 32 (1), 63-77. (Pubitemid 43260335)
60. Piper, P.S., &, Collamer, B.E., (2001). Male librarians. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27 (5), 406-411.
61. Price, D.J. de Solla,. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. In, C.E. Nelson, &, D.E. Pollock, (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers (pp. 3-22). Lexington, MA: Heath.
62. Prpic, K., (2007). Changes of scientific knowledge production and research productivity in a transitional society. Scientometrics, 72 (3), 487-511.
63. Reskin, B., (1978). Sex differentiation and the social organization of science. Sociological Inquiry, 48, 6-36.
64. Sandstrom, U., (2009). Research quality and diversity of funding: A model for relating research money to output of research. Scientometrics, 79 (2), 341-349.
65. Schuckman, H., (1987). PhD recipients in psychology and biology: Do those with dissertation advisors of the same sex publish scholarly papers more frequently ? American Psychologist, 42 (11), 987-992.
66. Shaw, D., &, Vaughan, L., (2008). Publication and citation patterns among LIS faculty: Profiling a "typical professor." Library & Information Science Research, 30 (1), 47-55.
67. Siegel, D., &, Baveye, P., (2010, September 17). Battling the paper glut [Letter]. Science, 329 (5998), 1466.
68. Stone, L., (1971). Prosopography. Daedalus, 100 (1), 46-79.
69. Sugimoto, C.R., (2011). Collaboration in information and library science doctoral education. Library & Information Science Research, 33, 3-11.
70. Sugimoto, C.R., Ni, C., Russell, T.G., &, Bychowski, B., (2011). Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity: An examination of dissertation networks in library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 68 (8), 1498-1514.
71. Sugimoto, C.R., Russell, T.G., Mehol, L.I., &, Marchionini, G., (2008). MPACT and citation impact: Two sides of the same scholarly coin ? Library and Information Science Research, 30 (4), 273-281.
72. Swales, J.M., (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73. Vasari, G., (1991). The lives of the artists. Oxford, UK: University Press. (Original work published 1550).
74. Wagner, C.S., (2008). The new invisible college: Science for development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
75. Wang, C., Han, J., Jia, Y., Zhang, D., Yu, Y., Tang, J., &, Guo, J., (2010, July). Mining advisor-advisee relationships from research publication networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '10) (pp. 203-212). New York: ACM Press. Retrieved from
76. White, H.D., (2000). Toward ego-centered citation analysis. In, B. Cronin, &, H.B. Atkins, (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 475-496). ASIS Monograph Series. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
77. White, H.D., (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (2), 87-108. (Pubitemid 32134183)
78. White, H.D., (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (5), 423-434.
79. Wiebe, T.J., (2004). Issues faced by male librarians: Stereotypes, perceptions, and career ramifications. Colorado Libraries, 31 (1), 11-13.
80. Williams, C.L., (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the "female" professions. Social Problems, 39 (3), 253-267.
81. Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F., &, Uzzi, B., (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316, 1036-1038.
82. Zhao, D., (2010). Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: A case study of the library and information science field. Scientometrics, 84, 293-306.