Metrics associated with NIH funding: A high-level view

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 423-431

  Boyack, Kevin W ^a   Jordan, Paul ^b  

^a SciTech Strategies Inc   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHOR; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT; MEDLINE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

BIBLIOMETRICS; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PUBMED; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79959633866     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000213     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Boyack KW. Linking grants to articles: characterization of NIH grant information indexed in medline. 12th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics 2009. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009:730-41.
2. McAllister PR, Wagner DA. Relationship between R&D expenditures and publication output for US colleges and universities. Res High Educ 1981;15:3-0.
3. McAllister PR, Narin F. Characterization of the research papers of US medical schools. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1983;34:123-31.
4. Bourke P, Butler L. The efficacy of different modes of funding research: perspectives from Australian data on the biological sciences. Res Pol 999;28:489-99.
5. Butler L. Revisiting bibliometric issues using new empirical data. Res Eval 2001;10:59-65.
6. Jimenez-Contreras E, Moya-Anegón F, Lopez ED. The evolution of research activity in Spain: The impact of the National Commission for the Evaluation f Research Activity (CNEAI). Res Pol 2003;32:123-42.
7. Kwan P, Johnston J, Fung AY, et al. A systematic evaluation of payback of publicly funded health and health services research in Hong Kong. BMC ealth Serv Res 2007;7:121.
8. Börner K, Ma N, Biberstine JR, et al. Introducing the Science of Science (Sci2) Tool to the Reporting Branch, Office of Extramural Research/Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: Science of Science Measurement Workshop, 2010.
9. Hicks D, Kroll P, Narin F, et al. Quantitative methods of research evaluation used by the US federal government: Second Theory-Oriented Research Group. Japan: National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP), 2002.
10. Lewison G. Gastroenterology research in the United Kingdom: funding sources and impact. Gut 1998;43:288-93.
11. Lewison G, Devey ME. Bibliometrics methods for the evaluation of arthritis research. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999;38:13-20.
12. Lewison G, Grant J, Jansen P. International gastroenterology research: Subject areas, impact, and funding. Gut 2001;49:295-302.
13. Boyack KW, Böner K. Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of esearch papers. J Am Soc Inform Sci Tech 2003;54:447-61.
14. Boyack KW. Mapping knowledge domains: characterizing PNAS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101(Suppl 1):5192-9.
15. Boyack KW, Börner K, Klavans R. Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research. Scientometrics 2009;79:45-60.
16. Zhao D. Characteristics and impact of grant-funded research: a case study of the library and information science field. Scientometrics 2010;84:293-306.
17. Lyubarova R, Itagaki BK, Itagaki MW. The impact of National Institutes of Health funding on US cardiovascular disease research. PLoS ONE 009;4:e6425.
18. Lewison G, Dawson G, Anderson J. The behaviour of biomedical scientific authors in acknowledging their funding sources. 5th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics 1995. River Forest, IL: 1995:25-63.
19. Cronin B, Franks S. Trading cultures: resource mobilization and service rendering in the life sciences as revealed in the journal article's paratext. J Am oc Inform Sci Tech 2006;57:1909-18.