Conflicts of jurisdiction: An exploratory study of academic, professional, and epistemological norms in library and information science

Libri

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-15

  Cronin, Blaise ^a   Davenport, Elisabeth ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b QUEEN MARGARET UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039302786     PISSN: 00242667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/libr.1996.46.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Abbott A. The system of professions: an essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
2. Avi. All that glitters. Horn Book Magazine, September/October 1987; 569-576.
3. Baum CD. Feminist thought in American librarianship. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 1992.
4. Blake VLP. Faculty productivity, journal prestige, and school library media faculty. School Library Media Quarterly, 22, Spring 1994; 153-158.
5. Blake, VLP, Tjoumas R. Through the looking glass darkly: research agendas and faculty attitudes regarding periodical prestige. Education for Information, 1995; 13 103-115.
6. Borgman CL et al. Children's use of an interactive science library: exploratory research. School Library Media Quarterly, 1990; 18(2): 108-112.
7. Bradley SJ, Willett P, Wood, F A. Publication and citation analysis of the Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield, 1980-1990. Journal of Information Science, 1992; 18(3): 225-232.
8. Buttlar L. Analyzing the library periodical literature: content and authorship. College and Research Libraries, 1991; 52(1): 38-53.
9. Cole J. Fair science: women in the scientific community. New York: Free Press, 1979.
10. Cronin B. Shibboleth and substance in North American library and information science education. Libri, 1995; 45(1): 45-63.
11. Cronin B, Overfelt K. Citation-based auditing of academic performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994; 45(2): 61-72.
12. Cronin B, Overfelt K. Postscript on program rankings. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1996; 47(2): 173-176.
13. Crowell A. Graduate program in children's books. New York Times November 1, 1992, v. 142. Section 4A, page ED7(n), column 1.
14. Davenport E. Re-positioning the library: how far can you go? Observations from a workshop with health sciences librarians. Assignation, Fall 1995; 18-22.
15. Davenport E, Snyder HS. Who cites women? Who do women cite? A study of gender and scholarly citation in sociology. Journal of Documentation, 1995; 51(4): 404-410.
16. Dervin B. The potential contribution of feminist scholarship to the field of communication. Journal of Communication, Autumn 1987; 37(4): 107-120.
17. Edmonds ML. From superstition to science: the role of research in strengthening public library service to children. Library Trends, 1987; 53(3): 509-520.
18. Ellis D. Paradigms and proto-paradigms in information retrieval research. In: Vakkari P. and Cronin B. (eds.). Conceptions of library and information science: historical empirical and theoretical perspectives. London: Taylor Graham. 1992; 165-186.
19. Estabrook L. Labor and librarians: the divisiveness of professionalism. Library Journal, 1981; 106: 125-127.
20. Farkas-Conn IS. From documentation to information science: the beginnings and early development of the American Documentation Institute - American Society for information Science. New York: Greenwood, 1990.
21. Ferber MA. Citations: are they an objective measure of scholarly merit? Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1986; 11(2): 381-389.
22. Fonow MM, Cook J A. Back to the future: a look at the second wave of feminist epistemology and methodology. In: Fonow MM, Cook JA (eds.). Beyond methodology: feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. 1991; 1-15.
23. Garland K. Gender differences in scholarly publication among faculty in ALA accredited library schools. Library & Information Science Research, 1990; 12(2): 155-166.
24. Garland K. The nature of publications authored by library and information science faculty. Library & Information Science Research, 1991(1); 13: 49-60.
25. Garrison D. Apostles of culture: the public librarian and American culture. New York: Free Press, 1979.
26. Gergen KJ. Feminist critique of science and the challenge of social epistemology. In: Gergen MM. (ed.). Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge. New York: New York University Press, 1988; 27-48.
27. Gilligan C. In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1982.
28. Gorman M. A bogus and dismal science or the eggplant that ate library schools. American Libraries, 1990; 21(5): 462-463.
29. Grant J. I feel therefore I am: a critique of female experience as the basis for a feminist epistemology. Women Politics, 1987; (3) Fall: 99-127.
30. Gross PR. Levitt N. Higher superstition: the academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore: John S. Hopkins University Press, 1994.
31. Hannigan J. A feminist standpoint for library and information science education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 1994; 35(4): 297-319.
32. Hannigan J, Crew H. A feminist paradigm for library and information science. Wilson Library Bulletin, October 1993; 28-32.
33. Harding S. Introduction: is there a feminist method? In: Harding S. (ed.). Feminism and methodology: social science issues. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press 1987; 1-14.
34. Harris RM. Librarianship: erosion of a women's profession. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1992a.
35. Harris RM. Librarianship: erosion of a women's profession. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 1992b; 17(3): 5-17.
36. Harris RM. Information technology and the deskilling of librarians. Computers in Libraries, January, 1992c; 8-16.
37. Harris RM. Gender, power and the dangerous pursuit of professionalism. American Libraries, October 1993; 874-876.
38. Harris RM. Abandoning care: information technology and the restructuring of Canadian public sector libraries. In: Rauch W et al. (eds.). Mehrwert von Information - Professionalisierung der Informations-arbeit. Konstanz. Universitatsverlag: 1994; 601-606.
39. Hayes RM. Citation statistics as a measure of faculty research productivity. Journal of Education for Librarianship, 23, 1983; 151-172.
40. Hildenbrand S. Ambiguous authority and aborted ambition: gender, professionalism and the rise and fall of the welfare state. Library Trends, 1985; 34(2): 185-198.
41. Hildenbrand S. The crisis in cataloguing: a feminist hypothesis. In: Intner SS, Hill JS (eds.) Recruiting educating and training cataloging librarians. New York: Greenwood Press, 1989; 207-225.
42. Hildenbrand S. Review of: Cultural crusaders: women librarians in the American west 1900-1917. In: Library Quarterly, 1995; 65(3): 356-358.
43. Josefson I. The nurse as engineer - the theory of knowledge in the care sector. In: Goranzon B, Josefson I (eds.). Knowledge skill and artificial intelligence: tacit knowledge and new technology. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1988; 19-30.
44. Keller EF. Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press: 1985.
45. Keller EF. The origin, history and politics of the subject called 'Gender and Science': a first person account. In: Jasanoff S et al. (eds.) Hand-book of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc, 1995; 80-94.
46. Lave J. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
47. Longino HE. Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.
48. Lutz C. The erasure of women's writing in sociocultural anthropology. American Ethnologist, 1990; 17: 611-627.
49. Maack MN, Passet JE. Aspirations and mentoring in the academic environment: women faculty in library and information science. Westport CT: Greenwood Press, 1994.
50. Meadows AJ. Origins of information science. London: Taylor Graham, 1987.
51. Oppenheim C. The correlation between citation counts and 1992 Research Assessment Exercise ratings for British library and information science university departments. Journal of Documentation, 1995; 51(1): 18-27.
52. Passet JE. Cultural crusaders: women librarians in the American West 1900-1917. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1994.
53. Patai D, Koertge N. Professing feminism. New York: Basic Books, 1994.
54. Petjersen AM. New model for multimedia interfaces to online public access catalogues. Electronic Library, 10(6): 1992, 359-366.
55. Pettigrew KW, Nicholls PT. Publication pattens of LIS faculty from 1982-1992: effects of doctoral programs. Library & Information Science Research, 1994; 16(2): 139-156.
56. Phenix K. Women's programs and issues at ALA 1992: a report. WLW Journal, 1992; 15(3): 5-7.
57. Pritchard S. Backlash, backwater or back to the drawing board?: Feminist thinking and librarianship in the 1990s. Wilson Library Bulletin, June 1994; 42-46.
58. Robertson SE. Closing address. In: Yates-Mercer PA. (ed.). Future trends in information science and technology: Proceedings of the Silver Jubilee Conference of the City University's Department of Information Science. London: Taylor Graham, 1988.
59. Rosaldo R. Culture and truth: the remaking of social analysis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1989.
60. Rose H. Hand, brain and heart: towards a feminist epistemology for the sciences. Signs, 1983; 9: 73-90.
61. Rose H. Beyond masculinist realities: a feminist epistemology for the sciences. In: Beier, R. (ed.). Feminist approaches to science. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1986, 57-76.
62. Rosser S. Biology and feminism: a dynamic interaction New York: Twayne Publishers, 1992.
63. Ruddick, S. Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies, Summer 1980; 6(2): 342-267.
64. Ruddick S. Material thinking. towards a politics of peace. New York: Ballantine Books, 1989.
65. Sandstrom AR. and Sandstrom PE. The use and misuse of anthropological methods in library and information science research. Library Quarterly, 1995; 65 (2): 161-199.
66. Saracevic T. (ed.). Introduction to information science. New York: Bowker, 1970.
67. Scherdin MJ, Beaubien A K. Shattering our stereotype: librarians' new image. Library Journal, 120 (12), July 1995, 35-38.
68. Seng LB, Willett P. The citedness of publications by United Kingdom library schools. Journal of Information Science, 1995; 21(1): 68-71.
69. Shapiro FR. The name of our profession. Legal Reference Service Quarterly, 1984; 4(2): 117-120.
70. Shapiro FR. Coinage of the term information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1995; 46(5): 384-385.
71. Sineath TW. (ed.). ALISE: Library and information science education .statistical report. Raleigh, NC: 1994.
72. Steig MF. The closing of library schools: Darwinism at the university. Library Quarterly, 1991; 61(3): 266-272.
73. Tuchman G. Discriminating science. Social Policy, 1980; 11(1): 59-64.
74. Vakkari P. Library and information science: its content and scope. Advances in Librarianship, 1994; 18: 155.
75. Vandergrift KE. A feminist perspective on multicultural children's literature in the middle years of the twentieth century. Library Trends, 1993a; 41(3): 354-377.
76. Vandergrift KE. A feminist research agenda in youth literature. Wilson Library Bulletin, October 1993b, 23-27.
77. Ward KB, Grant L. The feminist critique and a decade of published research in sociology journals. The Sociological Quarterly, 1985; 26(2): 139-157.
78. Ward KB, Grant L. Co-authorship, gender and publication among sociologists. In: Fonow, M. M. and Cook, J. A. (eds.). Beyond methodology: feminist scholarship as lived research. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1991; 248-264.
79. Webb B. Type casting: life with Myers-Briggs. Library Journal, 1990; June 15: 32-37.
80. White HS. Rankings of library and information science faculty and programs: the third in a series of studies undertaken at six-year intervals. Library Quarterly, 1993; 63(2): 166-188.