Peers and spheres of influence: Situating Rob Kling

Information Society

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 221-233

  Cronin, Blaise ^a   Shaw, Debora ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acknowledgment; Citation analysis; Co authorship; Collaboration; Scholarly communication; Social informatics; Social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547442566     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972240701444147     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Abbott, A. 1999. Departments & Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Allison, P. D., and Long, J. S. 1990. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review 55:469-478.
3. Biagioli, M., and Galison, P., eds. 2003. Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science. New York: Routledge.
4. Cronin, B. 1995. The Scholar's Courtesy: The Role and Significance of Acknowledgement in the Primary Communication Process. London: Taylor Graham.
5. Cronin, B. 2002. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52(7):558-569.
6. Cronin, B. 2004a. Bowling alone together: Academic writing as distributed cognition. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55(6):557-560.
7. Cronin, B. 2004b. From AI (artificial intelligence) to SI (social informatics): Rob Kling's intellectual Odyssey. In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, eds. S. A. Barab, R. Kling, and J. H. Gray, pp. xxi-xxv. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cronin, B. 2005a. Warm bodies, cold facts: The embodiment and emplacement of knowledge claims. In 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, eds. P. Ingwersen and B. Larsen, pp. 1-12. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinksa University Press.
9. Cronin, B. 2005b. The Hand of Science: Academic Writing and its Rewards. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
10. Cronin, B., and Shaw, D. 2002. Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics 54(1):31-49.
11. Cronin, B., Shaw, D., and La Barre, K. 2003. A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and sub-authorship collaboration in the twentieth century as manifested in the scholarly literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(9):855-871.
12. Cronin, B., Shaw, D., and La Barre, K. 2004. Visible, less visible, and invisible work: Patterns of collaboration in twentieth century chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52(2): 160-168.
13. Genette, G. 1997. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
14. Gieryn, T. 2002. Three truth-spots. Journal of History of the Behavioral Sciences 38(2):113-132.
15. Gieryn, T. 2006. City as truth-spot: Laboratories and field-sites in urban studies. Social Studies of Science 36(1):5-38.
16. Giles, C. L., and Councill, I. 2004. Who gets acknowledged? Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgement indexing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(51):17599-17604.
17. Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time (Trans. J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson). New York: Harper & Row.
18. Kling, R. 1980. Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent, empirical research. Computing Surveys 12(1):61-110.
19. Kling, R., and Scacchi, W. 1982. The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. Advances in Computers 21:1-90.
20. Krantz, D. L. 1972. Schools and systems: The mutual isolation of operant and non-operant psychology as a case study. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 8:86-102.
21. Laband, D. N., and Tollison, R. D. 2000. Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political Economy 108(3):632-662.
22. Lamb, R. 2003. The social construction of Rob Kling. The Information Society 19:195-196.
23. Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Merton, R. K. 1988. The Matthew effect, in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism, of intellectual, property. ISIS 79:606-623.
25. Monk, R. 2000. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. London: Penguin.
26. Mullins, N. C. 1973. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. London: Harper & Row.
27. Nersessian, N. J., Kurz-Milcke, E., Newstetter, W. C., and Davies, J. 2003. Research laboratories as evolving distributed cognitive systems. Proceedings of The 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 857-862.
28. Price, D. J. D. 1970. Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. In Communication Among Scientists and Engineers, eds. C. E. Nelson and D. K. Pollock, pp. 3-22. Lexington, MA: Heath.
29. Shapin, S. 1995. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Wellman, B. 2002. Little boxes, glocalization, and networked individualism. In Digital Cities II: Computational and Sociological Approaches, eds. M. Tanabe, P. van den Besselaar, and T. Ishida, pp. 11-25. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
31. Wellman, B., and Hiltz, S. R. 2004. Sociological Rob: How Rob Kling brought computing and sociology together. The Information Society 20:91-95.
32. White, H. D. 2001. Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52(20):87-108.