Warm bodies, cold facts: The embodiment and emplacement of knowledge claims

Proceedings of ISSI 2005: 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics

Volumn 1, Issue , 2005, Pages 1-12

  Cronin, Blaise ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751508984     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (88)

1. Allen, R. C. (1983). Collective invention. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 4, 1-24.
2. Allen, T. J. (1969). Information needs and uses. In: Cuadra, C. (Ed.). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 4. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 3-29.
3. Baber, Z. (2003). The taming of science and technology studies. Social Epistemology, 17(2&3), 95-98.
4. Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A networkanalytic model. American Sociological Review, 63, 829-846.
5. Barabási, A.-L. (2003). Linked: How Everything is Linked to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life. New York: Plume
6. Biagioli, M. (2003). Rights or rewards?Changing frameworks of scientific authorship. In: Biagioli, M. & Galison, P. (Eds.). Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science. New York: Routledge, 253-279.
7. Borgman, C. L. & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. In; Cronin, B. (Ed.). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 3-72.
8. Börner, K. (2003). Towards a cartographic map that shows the evolution of knowledge domains. Paper presented at the 99th Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers. (Available from the author).
9. Börner, K. & Penumarthy, S. (2004). Information production and consumption of major U.S. research institutions. (Available from the authors).
10. Börner, K., Chen, C. & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. In: Cronin, B. (Ed.). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 179-255.
11. Boyd, D., Lee, H.-Y., Ramage, D. & Donath, J. (2002). Developing legible visualizations for online social spaces. In: Proceedings of the Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences, January 7-10, Big Island, Hawaii.
12. Brody, T., Stamerjohanns, H., Harnad, S., Gingras, Y., Vallieres, F., & Oppenheim, C. (2004). The effect of open access on citation impact. Paper presented at National Policies on Open Access (OA) Provision for University Research Output: an International Meeting. Southampton University, 19th February 2004. Available at: http://opcit.eprints.org/feb19prog.html
13. Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (2000). The Social Life of Information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born Cyborgs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Collins, R. (2003). Fuller, Kuhn, and the emergent attention space of reflexive studies of science. Social Epistemology, 17(2&3), 147-152.
17. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Cronin, B. (2005). The Hand of Science: Academic Writing and its Rewards. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
19. Cronin, B. (2004). Bowling alone together: Academic writing as distributed cognition. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(6), 557-560.
20. Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558-569.
21. Cronin, B. (1995). The Scholar's Courtesy: The Role and Significance of Acknowledgement in the Primary Communication Process. London: Taylor Graham.
22. Cronin, B. (1984). The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication. London: Taylor Graham.
23. Cronin, B. & Shaw, D. (2005). Peers and spheres of influence: Situating Rob Kling. The Information Society (forthcoming).
24. Cronin, B. & Shaw, D. (2001). Identity-creators and image-makers: using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics, 54(1), 31-49.
25. Cronin, B., Shaw, D. & La Barre, K. (2003). A cast of thousands. Co-authorship and sub-authorship collaboration in the twentieth century as manifested in the scholarly literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 855-871.
26. Cronin, B., Shaw, D. & La Barre, K. (2004). Visible, less visible, and invisible work: patterns of collaboration in twentieth century chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 160-168.
27. Davenport, E. & Cronin, B. (2000). The citation network as a prototype for representing trust in virtual environments. In: Cronin, B. & Atkins, H. B. (Eds.). The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 517-534.
28. Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
29. Dourish, P. (2001a). Seeking a foundation for context-aware computing. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2-4), 229-242.
30. Dourish, P. (2001b). Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Erickson, T., Halverson, C., Kellogg. W.A., Laff, M. & Wolf, T. (2002). Social translucence: designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible. Available at: http://www.pliant.org/personal/Tom_Erickson/Soc_Infrastructures.html
32. Etzkowitz, H. & Kemelgor, C. (1998). The role of research centres in the collectivisation of academic science. Minerva, 36(3), 271-288.
33. Fitzgerald, M. (2004, April). Internetworking. Technology Review, 45-49.
34. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122, 108-111.
35. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description; Toward an interpretative theory of culture. In: The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
36. Genette, G. (1997a). Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
37. Genette, G. (1997b). Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Gieryn, T. (2005). City as truth-spot: Laboratories and field-sites in urban studies. Social Studies of Science (in press).
39. Gieryn, T. (2002). Three truth-spots. Journal of History of the Behavioral Sciences. 38(2), 113-132.
40. Giles, C. L., & Councill, I., (2004). Who gets acknowledged? Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgement indexing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(51), 17599-17604.
41. Goldfinger, C. (2000). Intangible Economy and Financial Markets: Preliminary Exploration: Available at: http://www.gefma.com/Articles/Idate_financial_markets.htm
42. Grafton, A. (1997). The Footnote: A Curious History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.
44. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
45. Harnad, S. & Carr, L. (2000). Integrating, navigating, and analysing open Eprint archives through open citation linking (the OpCit project). Current Science, 79(5), 629-638.
46. Heimeriks, G. & van den Besselaar, P. (2002). State of the Art in Bbliometrics and Webometrics. Available at: http://www.eicstes.org/EICSTES_PDF/Deliverables/
47. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.
48. Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2004). "I would like to thank my supervisor". Acknowledgements in graduate dissertations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 259-275.
49. Jasanoff, S. (2004). Afterword. In: Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. New York: Routledge, 274-282.
50. Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographic proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31(1), 31-43.
51. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Koku, E., Nazer, N. & Wellman, B. (2001). Netting scholars: Online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1750-1772.
53. Kurtz, M. J., Eichorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M, Murray, S. S., Martimbeau, N., & Elwell, B. (2005). The bibliometric properties of article readership information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. 56(2), 111-128
54. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56. Lin, X., White, H. D. & Buzydlowski, J. (2003). Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching. Information Processing & Management, 39(5), 689-706.
57. Mählck, P. & Persson, O. (2000). Socio-bibliometric mapping of intra-departmental networks. Scientometrics, 49, 81-91.
58. Matthiessen, C. W., Schwarz, A. W., & Find, S. (2002). The top-level global research system, 1997-1999: Centers, networks and nodality. An analysis based on bibliometric indicators. Urban Studies, 39(5-6), 903-927.
59. Merton, R. K. (1977). The sociology of science: an episodic memoir. In: Merton, R. K. & Gaston, J. (Eds.). The Sociology of Science in Europe. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 3-141.
60. Mullins, N. C. (1973). Theories and Theory Groups in American Sociology. London: Harper & Row.
61. Porter, M. E. (1998, November-December). Clusters: The new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 77-90.
62. Price, D. J. de Solla. (1970), Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. In: Nelson, C. E. & Pollock, D. K. (Eds.). Communication Among Scientists and Engineers. Lexington, MA: Heath, 3-22.
63. Price, D. J. de Solla. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510-515.
64. Rayward, W. B. (1992). Restructuring and mobilizing information in documents: a historical perspective. In; Vakkari, P. & Cronin, B. (Eds.). Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Historical, Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. London: Taylor Graham, 50-68.
65. Rheinberger, H-J. (2003). "Discourses of circumstance": A note on the author in science. In: Biagioli, M. & Galison, P. (Eds.). Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science. New York: Routledge, 309-323.
66. Rowlands, I. (1999). Patterns of author cocitation in information policy: evidence of social, collaborative and cognitive structures. Scientometrics, 44(3), 533-546.
67. Schwartz, B. (2005). The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. New York: Ecco.
68. Shapin, S. (1994). A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69. Simon, H. (1957). Administrative Behavior: A study of Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan.
70. Skupin, A. (2002). A cartographic approach to visualizing conference abstracts. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 22(1), 50-58.
71. Skupin, A. (2000). From metaphor to method: cartographic perspectives on information visualization. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000 (InfoVis2000). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE CS Press, 91-97.
72. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
73. Steiner, G. (2003). Lessons of the Masters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Swanson, D. (1989). Verification of results that logically related noninteractive literatures are potential sources of new knowledge Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(3), 152.
76. Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L. & Bjöneborn, L. (2005). Webometrics. In: Cronin, B. (Ed.). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 39, Medford, NJ: Information Today, 81-135.
77. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
78. van House, N. A. (2004). Science and technology studies and information studies. In: Cronin, B. (Ed.). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 3-86.
79. von Hippel, E. (1987). Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading, Research Policy, 16, 291-302
80. White, H. D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 89-116.
81. White, H. D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 87-108.
82. White, H. D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: overview and defense. In: C. L. Borgman (Ed.). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 84-106.
83. White, H. D. & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
84. White, H. D., Wellman, B. & Nazer, N. (2004). Does citation reflect social structure?: Longitudinal evidence from the 'Globenet' interdisciplinary research group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 111-126.
85. Wouters, P. (1999). The Citation Culture. University of Amsterdam, Ph.D. thesis.
86. Ziman, J. (2000). Real Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87. Zook, M. A. (2003). Underground globalization: mapping the space of flows of the Internet adult industry. Environment and Planning, 35, 1261-1286.
88. Zuccala, A. (2004). Revisiting the Invisible College: A Case Study of the Intellectual Structure and Social Process of Singularity Theory Research in Mathematics. University of Toronto, Ph.D. thesis.