Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: A three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility

Dental Materials

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 320-326

  Schaefer, Oliver ^a   Watts, David C ^b   Sigusch, Bernd W ^a   Kuepper, Harald ^a   Guentsch, Arndt ^a  

^a JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Dental ceramics; Internal fit; Marginal fit; Three dimensional analysis

Indexed keywords

CAD/CAMS; DENTAL CERAMIC; INTERNAL FIT; MARGINAL FIT; THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS;

CERAMIC MATERIALS; DENTAL MATERIALS; LITHIUM; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; RESTORATION; STATISTICAL TESTS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

LITHIA DISILICATE;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL PROCEDURE; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MOLAR TOOTH; PROSTHESIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION STUDY;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MOLAR; PROSTHESIS FITTING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84857065097     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. R.G. Craig, J.M. Powers, and J.C. Wataha Dental materials: properties and manipulation 8th ed. 2006 Mosby St. Louis
2. H.J. Conrad, W.J. Seong, and I.J. Pesun Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review J Prosthet Dent 98 2007 389 404
3. A. Keshvad, T. Hooshmand, F. Asefzadeh, F. Khalilinejad, M. Alihemmati, and R. Van Noort Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by cerec inlab and hot-pressed techniques J Prosthodont 20 2011 535 540
4. S. Addi, A. Hedayati-Khams, A. Poya, and G. Sjogren Interface gap size of manually and CAD/CAM-manufactured ceramic inlays/onlays in vitro J Dent 30 2002 53 58 (Pubitemid 40433461)
5. A. Bindl, and W.H. Mormann Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations J Oral Rehabil 32 2005 441 447 (Pubitemid 40770036)
6. I.S. Yeo, J.H. Yang, and J.B. Lee In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems J Prosthet Dent 90 2003 459 464
7. A.F. Quintas, F. Oliveira, and M.A. Bottino Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation J Prosthet Dent 92 2004 250 257 (Pubitemid 39179848)
8. W. Romao, W.G. Miranda, P.F. Cesar, and R.R. Braga Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems Oper Dent 29 2004 212 218 (Pubitemid 38507292)
9. C.F. Stappert, N. Denner, T. Gerds, and J.R. Strub Marginal adaptation of different types of all-ceramic partial coverage restorations after exposure to an artificial mouth Br Dent J 2005 199
10. R. Frankenberger, U. Lohbauer, R.B. Schaible, S.A. Nikolaenko, and M. Naumann Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements Dent Mater 24 2008 185 191 (Pubitemid 350299059)
11. S. Reich, S. Gozdowski, L. Trentzsch, R. Frankenberger, and U. Lohbauer Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs. CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype Oper Dent 33 2008 644 650
12. C.F. Stappert, S. Chitmongkolsuk, N.R. Silva, W. Att, and J.R. Strub Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials Dent Mater J 24 2008 1248 1257
13. M.A. Al-Rabab'ah, T.V. Macfarlane, and J.F. McCord Vertical marginal and internal adaptation of all-ceramic copings made by CAD/CAM technology Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 16 2008 109 115
14. M.R. Baig, K.B. Tan, and J.I. Nicholls Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system J Prosthet Dent 104 2010 216 227
15. E. Yuksel, and A. Zaimoglu Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all-ceramic crown systems Braz Oral Res 25 2011 261 266
16. M. Guazzato, M. Albakry, S.P. Ringer, and M.V. Swain Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glass-infiltrated ceramics Dent Mater 20 2004 441 448
17. T. Ohyama, M. Yoshinari, and Y. Oda Effects of cyclic loading on the strength of all-ceramic materials Int J Prosthodont 12 1999 28 37
18. C.F. Stappert, W. Att, T. Gerds, and J.R. Strub Fracture resistance of different partial-coverage ceramic molar restorations: an in vitro investigation J Am Dent Assoc 137 2006 514 522 (Pubitemid 43671932)
19. T. Nakamura, T. Ohyama, A. Imanishi, and S. Ishigaki Fracture resistance of pressable glass-ceramic fixed partial dentures J Oral Rehabil 29 2002 951 955 (Pubitemid 41705074)
20. A.J. Raigrodski Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature J Prosthet Dent 92 2004 557 562 (Pubitemid 39593586)
21. C.F. Stappert, U. Ozden, W. Att, T. Gerds, and J.R. Strub Marginal accuracy of press-ceramic veneers influenced by preparation design and fatigue Am J Dent 20 2007 380 384
22. O. Moldovan, R.G. Luthardt, N. Corcodel, and H. Rudolph Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings Dent Mater 27 2011 1273 1278
23. American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association ANSI/ADA specification 19/ISO 4823:2000. Dental elastomeric impression materials 2004 ADA Chicago Available at: http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/prods-services/ ISOstore/store.html
24. C.P. Wadhwani, G.H. Johnson, X. Lepe, and A.J. Raigrodski Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials J Prosthet Dent 93 2005 530 539 (Pubitemid 40798342)
25. T.J. Bomberg, R.A. Hatch, and W. Hoffman Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays J Prosthet Dent 54 1985 170 172
26. J. Valderhaug, and F. Floystrand Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays J Prosthet Dent 52 1984 514 517
27. B.J. Millar, S.M. Dunne, and M. Nesbit A comparison of three wetting agents used to facilitate the pouring of dies J Prosthet Dent 74 1995 341 344
28. B.J. Millar, S.M. Dunne, and P.B. Robinson The effect of a surface wetting agent on void formation in impressions J Prosthet Dent 77 1997 54 56
29. R.G. Luthardt, R. Loos, and S. Quaas Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression Int J Comput Dent 8 2005 283 294 (Pubitemid 43357277)
30. A. Ender, and A. Mehl Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions - an in vitro study Int J Comput Dent 14 2011 11 21
31. R.G. Luthardt, G. Bornemann, S. Lemelson, M.H. Walter, and A. Huls An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing Int J Prosthodont 17 2004 680 685 (Pubitemid 39643276)
32. M. Groten, D. Axmann, L. Probster, and H. Weber Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in vitro testing J Prosthet Dent 83 2000 40 49
33. Phillips SD. Report of a special test. NIST test No. 681/280055-10 October 8; 2010. Available at http://www.geomagic.com/download-file/view/1133/ 104/ [accessed 11.11.11].
34. S. Etemadi, R.J. Smales, P.W. Drummond, and J.R. Goodhart Assessment of tooth preparation designs for posterior resin-bonded porcelain restorations J Oral Rehabil 26 1999 691 697
35. C.J. Soares, L.R. Martins, R.B. Fonseca, L. Correr-Sobrinho, and A.J. Fernandes Neto Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations J Prosthet Dent 95 2006 421 429 (Pubitemid 43831081)
36. C.F. Stappert, N. Stathopoulou, T. Gerds, and J.R. Strub Survival rate and fracture strength of maxillary incisors, restored with different kinds of full veneers J Oral Rehabil 32 2005 266 272 (Pubitemid 40470035)
37. M. Albakry, M. Guazzato, and M.V. Swain Biaxial flexural strength, elastic moduli, and X-ray diffraction characterization of three pressable all-ceramic materials J Prosthet Dent 89 2003 374 380 (Pubitemid 37323893)
38. M. Albakry, M. Guazzato, and M.V. Swain Fracture toughness and hardness evaluation of three pressable all-ceramic dental materials J Dent 31 2003 181 188 (Pubitemid 36875954)
39. A. Della Bona, J.J. Mecholsky Jr., and K.J. Anusavice Fracture behavior of lithia disilicate- and leucite-based ceramics Dent Mater 20 2004 956 962 (Pubitemid 40146125)
40. M.N. Mandikos Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: an update on clinical use Aust Dent J 43 1998 428 434 (Pubitemid 128519769)
41. T. Stober, G.H. Johnson, and M. Schmitter Accuracy of the newly formulated vinyl siloxanether elastomeric impression material J Prosthet Dent 103 2010 228 239
42. R. Van Noort The future of dental devices is digital Dent Mater 28 2012 3 12