Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all-ceramic crown systems

Brazilian Oral Research

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 261-266

  Yüksel, Ece ^a   Zaimoǧlu, Ali ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Crowns; Dental cements; Dental leakage; Dental marginal adaptation

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TOOTH CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TIME; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CROWNS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; MATERIALS TESTING; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79959391649     PISSN: 18068324     EISSN: 18073107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242011000300012     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Trajtenberg CP, Caram SJ, Kiat-amnuay S. Microleakage of all-ceramic crowns using self-etching resin luting agents. Oper Dent. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(4):392-9.
2. Rossetti PHO, Valle AL, Carvalho RM, Goes MF, Pegoraro LF. Correlation between margin fit and microleakage in complete crowns cemented with three luting agents. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 Feb;16(1):64-9.
3. Albert FE, El-Mowafy OM. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera Allceram crowns with four cements. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):529-35.
4. Gorman CM, McDevitt WE, Hill RG. Comparison of two heat-pressed all-ceramic dental materials. Dent Mater. 2000 Nov;16(6):389-95.
5. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1997 Sep-Oct;10(5):478-84.
6. Yeo IS, Yang JH, Lee JB. In vitro marginal fit of three allceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Nov;90(5):459-64.
7. Lee K, Park C, Kim K, Kwon T. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated with two diferent CAD/CAM systems. Dent Mater J. 2008 May;27(3):422-6.
8. Shiratsuchi H, Komine F, Kakehashi Y, Matsumura H. Influence of finish line desing on marginal adaptation of electroformed metal-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Mar; 95(3):237-42.
9. Gu XH, Kern M. Marginal discrepancies and leakage of allceramic crowns: Influence of luting agents and aging conditions. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):109-16.
10. Lyons K M, Rodda JC, Hood JAA. Use of a pressure chamber to compare microleakage of three luting agents. Int J Prosthodont. 1997 Sep-Oct;10(5):426-33.
11. Tjan AHL, Peach KD, VanDenburgh SL, Zbaraschuk ER. Microleakage of crowns cemented with glass ionomer cemment: Effects of preparation finish and conditioning with polyacrylic acid. J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Nov;66(5):602-6.
12. Bernal G, Jones RM, Brown DT, Munoz CA, Goodacre CJ. The effect of finish line form and luting agent on the breaking strenght of Dicor crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1993 May-Jun;6(3):286-90.
13. Viotti RG, Kasaz A, Pena CE, Alexandre RS, Arrais CA, Reis AF. Microtensile bond strength of new self adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Nov;102(5):306-12.
14. Goldin EB, Boyd III NW, Goldstein GR, Hittelman EL, Thompson VP. Marginal fit of leucite-glass pressable ceramic restorations and ceramic-pressed-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Feb;93(2):143-7.
15. Grey NJ, Piddock V, Wilson MA. In vitro comparison of conventional crowns and a new all-ceramic system. J Dent. 1993 Feb;21(1):47-51.
16. Gonzalo E, Suarez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JFL. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Dec;102(6):378-84.
17. Gonzalo E, Suarez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JFL. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):374-7.
18. Balkaya MC, Cinar A, Pamuk S. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Apr;93(4):346-55.
19. Ferrari M, Dagostin A, Fabianelli A. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system. Dent Mater. 2003 Jun;19(4):270-6.
20. Bönecker-Valverde G, Maniglia-Ferreira C, Abi-Rached GP, Gomes BP, Mesquita MF. Seal capability of interim post and core crown with temporary cements. Braz Oral Res. 2010 Apr-Jun;24(2):238-44.
21. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent Mater. 2004 Jun;20(5):463-9.
22. Reich S, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. The effect of finish line preparation and layer thickness on the failure load and fractrography of ZrO2 copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 May;99(5):369-76.
23. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to metal and two types of ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Jan;63(1):26-31.
24. Beschnidt SM, Strub JR. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Jul;26(7):582-93.