Fracture resistance of different partial-coverage ceramic molar restorations: An in vitro investigation

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 137, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 514-522

  Stappert, Christian F J ^a,b   Att, Wael ^a   Gerds, Thomas ^a   Strub, Joerg R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ceramic restoration; Fatigue; Fracture strength; Onlay; Partial coverage restoration

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646364586     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0224     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Agerholm DM, Sidi AD. Reasons given for extraction of permanent teeth by general dental practitioners in England and Wales. Br Dent J 1988;164:345-8.
2. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjor IA, Wilson NH, Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices. Print Dent Care 1999;6(1):17-20.
3. van Dijken JW, Hasselrot L, Ormin A, Olofsson AL. Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage: a 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;8;109:222-9.
4. Perry RD, Kugel G. Success with inlays/onlays: the seven essentials. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002;23(3 supplement 1):30-5.
5. van Dijken JW, Sjostrom S. Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 1998;2(4):180-3.
6. Burke FJ. The effect of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 1995;26:293-300.
7. Christensen GJ. The bonding evolution in dentistry continues. JADA 1996;127:1114-6.
8. Burke FJ, Fleming GJ, Nathanson D, Marquis PM. Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent 2002;4(1):7-22.
9. Blatz MB. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 2002;33:415-26.
10. Hayashi M, Wilson NH, Yeung CA, Worthington HV. Systematic review of ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7(1):8-19.
11. Gaglio MA. Esthetic restorations designed with confidence and predictability. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22(supplement 6):30-4.
12. van Dijken JW. All-ceramic restorations: classification and clinical evaluations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:1115-24.
13. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3(1):45-64.
14. Marinello C, Soom U, Schaerer P. Tooth preparation in adhesive dentistry. Dent Today 1991;10(8):46, 48-51.
15. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997;25:459-73.
16. Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:410-6.
17. Ritter AV, Nunes MF, Swift EJ Jr. Longevity of ceramic inlays/onlays, part I. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14:377-9.
18. Ritter AV, Nunes MF. Longevity of ceramic inlays/onlays: part II. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:60-3.
19. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:239-46.
20. Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, Scharer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:9-16.
21. Rosenblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. JADA 1997;128:297-307.
22. Lehner C, Studer S, Brodbeck U, Schärer P. Six-year clinical results of leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays. Acta Med Dent Helv 1998;3:137-46.
23. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Kramer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Oper Dent 2000;25:459-65.
24. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:194-200.
25. El-Mowafy O, Brochu JF. Longevity and clinical performance of IPS-Empress ceramic restorations: a literature review. J Can Dent Assoc 2002;68:233-7.
26. Kramer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 2005;21:262-71.
27. Höland W, Schweiger M, Frank M, Rheinberger V. A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress 2 and the IPS Empress glass-ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:297-303.
28. Stappert CF, Stathopoulou N, Gerds T, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of maxillary incisors, restored with different kinds of full veneers. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:266-72.
29. Kelly JR, Tesk JA, Sorensen JA. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling. J Dent Res 1995;74:1253-8.
30. Kern M, Douglas WH, Fechtig T, Strub JR, DeLong R. Fracture strength of all-porcelain, resin-bonded bridges after testing in an artificial oral environment. J Dent 1993;21:117-21.
31. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems, part 1: a computer-controlled mastication simulator [in German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:953-60.
32. De Boever JA, McCall WD Jr, Holden S, Ash MM Jr. Functional occlusal forces: an investigation by telemetry. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:326-33.
33. Helfer AR, Melnick S, Schilder H. Determination of the moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;34:661-70.
34. Kelly JR. Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater 1995;11:103-10.
35. Muehlemann H. Physiologic and pathologic dental mobility [in German]. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd 1951;93:1-67.
36. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer JM, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 1990;21:823-31.
37. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Bonded to tooth ceramic restorations: in vitro evaluation of the efficiency and failure mode of two modern adhesives [in German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1995;105:299-305.
38. Cotert HS, Sen BH, Balkan M. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2001:14:374-8.
39. Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC, Lee RB. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:109-14.
40. Kern M, Strub JR, Lu XY. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:372-8.
41. Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Mauderli A, Lundeen HC. Limits of human bite strength. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:226-9.
42. DeLong R, Douglas WH. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 1983;62:32-6.
43. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, DeLong R, Pintado MR. The wear of a posterior-composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 1986;2:235-40.
44. Krejci I, Lutz F. In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems: correlation with in-vivo results [in German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:1445-9.
45. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann JL. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:425-30.
46. Mehl A, Pfeiffer A, Kremers L, Hickel R. Marginal accuracy of Cerec 2 inlays with extended cavities and weakened cusps [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1998;53:57-60.
47. Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, et al. Occlusal forces during chewing: influences of biting strength and food consistency. J Prosthet Dent 1981:46:561-7.
48. Peters MC, de Vree JH, Brekelmans WA. Distributed crack analysis of ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 1993;72:1537-42.
49. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:652-61.
50. Kelly JR, Giordano R, Pober R, Cima MJ. Fracture surface analysis of dental ceramics: clinically failed restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:430-40.
51. Deng Y, Lawn BR, Lloyd IK. Characterization of damage modes in dental ceramic bilayer structures. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:137-45.
52. Lawn BR, Deng Y, Thompson VP. Use of contact testing in the characterization and design of all-ceramic crownlike layer structures: a review. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:495-510.