Interface gap size of manually and CAD/CAM-manufactured ceramic inlays/onlays in vitro

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 53-58

  Addi, Simon ^a   Hedayati Khams, Arjang ^a   Poya, Amin ^a   Sjögren, Göran ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Ceramic; Ceramic inlays; Composite; Dental materials; Inlays; Internal gap; Marginal gap

Indexed keywords

RESIN; ALUMINUM SILICATE; DENZIR; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; OPTIMAL PRESSED CERAMIC; PANAVIA FLUORO; PANAVIA-FLUORO; RESIN CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ASSISTANT; DENTAL SURGERY; HEAT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; CEMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; ENDODONTICS; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; BICUSPID; CEMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL PORCELAIN; HUMAN; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); RESIN CEMENTS; TECHNOLOGY, DENTAL;

EID: 0036133921     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00059-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Martin N, Jedyankiewicz NM. Interface dimensions of Cerec-2 MOD inlays. Dent Mater 2000;16:68-74.
2. Sertgöz A, Gemalmaz D, Alkumru H, Yoruç B. Luting composite thickness of two ceramic inlay systems. Eur J Prosthod Restorative Dent 1995;3:151-4.
3. Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthetic Dent 1999;11:206-14.
4. Audenino G, Bresciano ME, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthod 1999;12:342-7.
5. Kawai K, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quint Int 1994;25:53-8.
6. van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. J Dent 1994;22:265-72.
7. Mörmann W, Krejci I. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ; clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quint Int 1992;23:109-15.
8. Sjögren G. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:24-8.
9. Sjögren G. Dental ceramics and ceramic restorations. An in vitro and in vivo study. Swed Dent J, Suppl 1996;111:3-50.
10. Sjögren G, Hedlund S-O. Filler content and gap widths after luting, using the ultrasonic insertion technique, and composite resin cements. An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:403-7.
11. Sjölin R, Sundh A, Bergman M. The Decim System for production of dental restorations. Int J Computerized Dent 1999;2:197-207.
12. Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, Schärer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: technology and strength. Int J Prosthod 1992;5:9-16.
13. Panzera C. Opc. The new and improved pressable ceramic [brochure]. Wallingford, CT: Jeneric Pentron, 1996.
14. Duret F, Blouin J-L, Duret B. CAD-CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:715-20.
15. McLean JW, von Frauenhofer JA. The estimation of cement thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11.
16. Bäck T. Assessment of fit of dental crown reconstructions: a critical analysis of error sources. Göteborg, Sweden: Institute of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, 1993.
17. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:263-7.
18. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent 1994;222:147-53.
19. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Williams G, et al. Marginal adaption of four tooth-coulered inlay systems in vitro. J Dent 1992;20:18-26.
20. Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding of zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998;14:64-71.
21. Mörmann WH. The Cerec 3 - a quantum leap for computer-aided restorations: initial clinical results. Quint Int 2000;31:699-712.
22. Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidsson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 1989;68:48-50.
23. Reich E, Schmalz G, Federlin M. Marginal fit of ceramic and composite inlays in vitro. Deutsche Zahnärtzliche Zeitschrift 1990;45:656-60.
24. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. An in vitro study of parameters related to marginal and internal seal of bonded restorations. Quint Int 1993;24:281-91.