Full arch scans: Conventional versus digital impressions - An in-vitro study;Ganzkieferaufnahmen: Konventionelle versus digitale Abformtechnik - Eine In-vitro-Untersuchung

International Journal of Computerized Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 11-21

  Ender, A ^a   Mehl, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Accuracy; CAD CAM; Cerec bluecam; Digital impression; Lava COS; Precision; Trueness

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM SULFATE; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMPREGUM; INSTRUMENTATION; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH ARCH;

CALCIUM SULFATE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAXILLA; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SOFTWARE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 79954438032     PISSN: 14634201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Christensen GJ. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139: 761-763.
2. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008; 204: 505-511.
3. Fasbinder DJ. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent, Spec No 4 2010; 31: 2-11, quiz 12.
4. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008; 29: 494, 496, 498-505.
5. Dalstra M, Melsen B. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 2009; 36: 36-41, discussion 14.
6. Luthardt RG, Koch R, Rudolph H et al. Qualitative computer aided evaluation of dental impressions in vivo. Dent Mater 2006; 22:69-76. (Pubitemid 41808728)
7. Persson A, Andersson M, Oden A et al. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 194-200. (Pubitemid 43388110)
8. Wostmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 158-160.
9. Walker MP, Ries D, Borello B. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 669-674.
10. Rudolph H, Luthardt RG, Walter MH. Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology. Comput Biol Med 2007; 37: 579-587. (Pubitemid 46400614)
11. Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W et al. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009; 12: 11-28.
12. Quaas et al. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent, 2007; 35:903-908.
13. Ender et al. New procedure for accuracy measurement of full arch impression, in preparation.
14. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH et al. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1799-1807. (Pubitemid 127732204)
15. Brosky ME, Major RJ, DeLong RAet al. Evaluation of dental arch reproduction using three-dimensional optical digitization. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 434-440. (Pubitemid 37346292)
16. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005; 8:283-294. (Pubitemid 43357277)
17. Persson AS, Oden A, Andersson M et al. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 929-936.
18. Baig MR, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 216-227.
19. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D et al. Clinical evaluation of allceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010; 38: 553-559.
20. Piwowarczyk A, Ottl P, Buchler A et al. In vitro study on the dimensional accuracy of selected materials for monophase elastic impression making. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 168-174.
21. Caputi S, Varvara G. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99: 274-281.
22. Balkenhol M, Ferger P, Wostmann B. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20:573-575.