Marginal adaptation of different types of all-ceramic partial coverage restorations after exposure to an artificial mouth

British Dental Journal

Volumn 199, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 779-783

  Stappert, C F J ^a,b   Denner, N ^a   Gerds, T ^a   Strub, J R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MASTICATION; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MASTICATION;

EID: 30344450830     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: 17417503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813036     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anusavice K J. Degradability of dental ceramics. Adv Dent Res 1992; 6: 82-89.
2. Rehberg H J. Exact marginal accuracy - what does that mean? Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1971; 26: 696-699.
3. Noack M J. Adaptation of composite-, glass-ceramic- and ceramic-inlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994; 49: 873-878.
4. Kerschbaum T. Standardized margin of the restoration? - Results from the clinical point of view. In Walther W (ed) Qualitätssicherung in der Zahnheilkunde. pp 19-45. Heidelberg: Hüthig GmbH, 1995.
5. Holmes J R, Bayne S C, Holland G A et al. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 405-408.
6. Dreyer Jorgensen K. Testing results of dental casting techniques. Dtsch Zahnäztl Z 1958; 13: 461-649.
7. McLean J W, Von Fraunhofer J A. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971; 131: 107-111.
8. Marxkors R. Marginal accuracy of gold crowns. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1980; 35: 913-915.
9. Spiekermann H. Crown restorations and periodontal tissue response. In Lange D E (ed) Parodontologie, Implantologie und Prothetik im Brennpunkt von Praxis und Wissenschaft. pp 209-233. Berlin: Quintessenz, 1985.
10. Delong R, Douglas W H. Devlopment of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 32-36.
11. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, De Long R et al. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 235-240.
12. Denissen H, Dozic A, Van Der Zel J, M V W. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC and PROCERA onlays. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 506-513.
13. Hürzeler M, Zimmermann E, Mörmann W H. The marginal adaptation of mechanically produced onlays in vitro. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990; 100: 715-720.
14. Schäfers F, Järschke J, Meyer G. Accuracy of fit of different all-ceramic procedures. ZWR 1994; 103: 686-689.
15. Lang R, Rosentritt M, Behr M, et al. The influence of modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid modified composite- and composite resin on the marginal accuracy of ceramic inlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2000; 55: 540-543.
16. Gemalmaz D, Ozcan M, Alkumru H N. A clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays bonded with different luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 273-283.
17. Lafuente J D, Chaves A, Carmiol R. Bond strength of dual-cured resin cements to human teeth. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 105-110.
18. Molin M K, Karlsson S L, Kristiansen M S. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 245-249.
19. Gemalmaz D, Özcan M, Yoruc AB, et al. Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 646-651.
20. Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, et al. Retrospective clinical study and survival analysis on partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Invest 2000; 4: 199-205.
21. Isenberg B P, Essig M E, Leinfelder K F. Three-year clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM restorations. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4: 173-176.
22. Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, et al. IPS EMPRESS inlays and onlays after four years - a clinical study. J Dent 1999; 27: 325-331.
23. Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 122-128.
24. Felden A, Schmalz G, Hiller K-A. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Invest 1998; 2: 161-167.
25. Hahn R. Experimental investigations of reproducible fitting accuracy of ceramic inserts. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1990; 45: 653-656.
26. Siervo S, Bandettini B, Siervo P, et al. The CELAY system: a comparison of the fit of direct and indirect fabrication technique. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 434-439.
27. Siervo S, Pampalone A, Siervo P, et al. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance. Quintessence Int 1994; 25: 773-779.
28. Mörmann W H, Schug J. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit aof CEREC 2 CAD/CIM inlays. J Amer Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 47-53.
29. Sturdevant J R, Bayne S C, Heymann H O. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 206-214.