Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers: Era of "mR Conditional" designs

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Shinbane, Jerold S ^a   Colletti, Patrick M ^a   Shellock, Frank G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIVENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; BRADYCARDIA; CARDIAC PATIENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONDITIONING; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEFIBRILLATOR; DEVICE SAFETY; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; ENERGY TRANSFER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FILTER; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEART ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE; HEART CONDUCTION; HEART REPOLARIZATION; HUMAN; MAGNETIC FIELD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PACEMAKER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION SHIELD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SINUS NODE; SINUS RHYTHM; TACHYCARDIA; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; EQUIPMENT; HEART PACING; INSTRUMENTATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PREDICTIVE VALUE;

CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; PATIENT SAFETY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 84856794492     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-63     Document Type: Review

References (145)

1. MR in patients with pacemakers and ICDs: Defining the issues. Shinbane JS, Colletti PM, Shellock FG, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007 9 1 5 13 10.1080/10976640601117056 17178675 (Pubitemid 46018478)
2. Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Kalin R, Stanton MS, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 4 326 328 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.50024.x 15826268 (Pubitemid 40604048)
3. MR labeling information for implants and devices: explanation of terminology. Shellock FG, Woods TO, Crues JV, Radiology 2009 253 1 26 30 10.1148/radiol.2531091030 19789253
4. The effects of nuclear magnetic resonance on patients with cardiac pacemakers. Pavlicek W, Geisinger M, Castle L, Borkowski GP, Meaney TF, Bream BL, Gallagher JH, Radiology 1983 147 1 149 153 6828720 (Pubitemid 13112334)
5. The effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imagers on external and implantable pulse generators. Fetter J, Aram G, Holmes DR, Gray JE, Hayes DL, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1984 7 4 720 727 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1984.tb05602.x 6205375 (Pubitemid 14037689)
6. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on DDD pacemakers. Erlebacher JA, Cahill PT, Pannizzo F, Knowles RJ, Am J Cardiol 1986 57 6 437 440 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90768-X 3946261 (Pubitemid 16119716)
7. The effects of magnetic resonance imaging on implantable pulse generators. Holmes DR Jr, Hayes DL, Gray JE, Merideth J, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1986 9 3 360 370 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1986.tb04490.x 2423977 (Pubitemid 16083187)
8. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of a patient with implanted transvenous pacemaker. Iberer F, Justich E, Stenzl W, Tscheliessnig KH, Kapeller J, Herz 1987 7 196 199
9. Effect of 1.5 tesla nuclear magnetic resonance imaging scanner on implanted permanent pacemakers. Hayes DL, Holmes DR Jr, Gray JE, J Am Coll Cardiol 1987 10 4 782 786 10.1016/S0735-1097(87)80270-X 3655146 (Pubitemid 17163101)
10. Loss Prevention case of the month. Not my responsibility! Avery JK, J Tenn Med Assoc 1988 81 8 523 3411965
11. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with a DDD Pacemaker. Alagona P Jr, Toole JC, Maniscalco BS, Glover MU, Abernathy GT, Prida XE, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989 12 4 Pt 1 619 2470044
12. Case report: nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with a pacemaker. Inbar S, Larson J, Burt T, Mafee M, Ezri MD, Am J Med Sci 1993 305 3 174 175 10.1097/00000441-199303000-00009 8447338 (Pubitemid 23098292)
13. Pacemaker interactions with transcutaneous cardiac pacing. Amar D, Gross JN, Anesthesiology 1994 80 3 717 718 10.1097/00000542-199403000-00056 8141482 (Pubitemid 24097722)
14. Effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers. Lauck G, von Smekal A, Wolke S, Seelos KC, Jung W, Manz M, Luderitz B, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995 18 8 1549 1555 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb06741.x 7479176
15. Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers. Gimbel JR, Johnson D, Levine PA, Wilkoff BL, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996 19 6 913 919 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03387.x 8774821 (Pubitemid 26176166)
16. Magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with a dual-chamber pacemaker. Garcia-Bolao I, Albaladejo V, Benito A, Alegria E, Zubieta JL, Acta Cardiol 1998 53 1 33 35 9638968 (Pubitemid 28484466)
17. Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators are unaffected by operation of an extremity MR imaging system. Shellock FG, O'Neil M, Ivans V, Kelly D, O'Connor M, Toay L, Crues JV, AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999 172 1 165 170 9888762 (Pubitemid 29028452)
18. MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T. Sommer T, Vahlhaus C, Lauck G, von Smekal A, Reinke M, Hofer U, Block W, Traber F, Schneider C, Gieseke J, Jung W, Schild H, Radiology 2000 215 3 869 879 10831713 (Pubitemid 30346032)
19. Force and torque effects of a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner on cardiac pacemakers and ICDs. Luechinger R, Duru F, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P, Candinas R, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001 24 2 199 205 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00199.x 11270700 (Pubitemid 32207593)
20. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging: are there irreversible changes at 0.5 Tesla? Vahlhaus C, Sommer T, Lewalter T, Schimpf R, Schumacher B, Jung W, Luderitz B, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001 24 4 Pt 1 489 495 11341087 (Pubitemid 32374871)
21. The interference threshold of unipolar cardiac pacemakers in extremely low frequency magnetic fields. Scholten A, Silny J, J Med Eng Technol 2001 25 5 185 194 10.1080/03091900110066419 11695658 (Pubitemid 32999761)
22. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator dysfunction during and after magnetic resonance imaging. Anfinsen OG, Berntsen RF, Aass H, Kongsgaard E, Amlie JP, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002 25 9 1400 1402 10.1046/j.1460-9592. 2002.01400.x 12380781
23. Pacemaker interference by magnetic fields at power line frequencies. Dawson TW, Caputa K, Stuchly MA, Shepard RB, Kavet R, Sastre A, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002 49 3 254 262 10.1109/10.983460 11876290 (Pubitemid 34151003)
24. Magnetic resonance safety testing of a newly-developed fiber-optic cardiac pacing lead. Greatbatch W, Miller V, Shellock FG, J Magn Reson Imaging 2002 16 1 97 103 10.1002/jmri.10129 12112509 (Pubitemid 34700848)
25. Electronic security systems and active implantable medical devices. Irnich W, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002 25 8 1235 1258 10.1046/j.1460-9592. 2002.01235.x 12358176
26. Pacemaker reed switch behavior in 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging units: are reed switches always closed in strong magnetic fields? Luechinger R, Duru F, Zeijlemaker VA, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P, Candinas R, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002 25 10 1419 1423 10.1046/j.1460-9592. 2002.01419.x 12418737 (Pubitemid 35222797)
27. Radiofrequency heating effects around resonant lengths of wire in MRI. Pictet J, Meuli R, Wicky S, van der Klink JJ, Phys Med Biol 2002 47 16 2973 2985 10.1088/0031-9155/47/16/312 12222860 (Pubitemid 34947032)
28. Complete loss of ICD programmability after magnetic resonance imaging. Fiek M, Remp T, Reithmann C, Steinbeck G, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004 27 7 1002 1004 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00573.x 15271024 (Pubitemid 38970220)
29. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, Pulling CC, Fair R, Jenkins K, J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 43 7 1315 1324 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.016 15063447 (Pubitemid 38452612)
30. Implantable cardiac defibrillator interactions with magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla. Coman JA, Martin ET, Sandler DA, Thomas RT, J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 43 5 138A
31. Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: in vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T. Roguin A, Zviman MM, Meininger GR, Rodrigues ER, Dickfeld TM, Bluemke DA, Lardo A, Berger RD, Calkins H, Halperin HR, Circulation 2004 110 5 475 482 10.1161/01.CIR.0000137121.28722.33 15277324 (Pubitemid 39031161)
32. Is magnetic resonance imaging safe in cardiac pacemaker recipients? Del Ojo JL, Moya F, Villalba J, Sanz O, Pavon R, Garcia D, Pastor L, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 4 274 278 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.50033.x 15826258 (Pubitemid 40604039)
33. Strategies for the safe magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker-dependent patients. Gimbel JR, Bailey SM, Tchou PJ, Ruggieri PM, Wilkoff BL, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 10 1041 1046 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00230.x 16221260 (Pubitemid 43951406)
34. Outcome of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in selected patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Gimbel JR, Kanal E, Schwartz KM, Wilkoff BL, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 4 270 273 10.1111/j.1540-8159. 2005.09520.x 15826257 (Pubitemid 40604038)
35. Simple design changes to wires to substantially reduce MRI-induced heating at 1.5 T: implications for implanted leads. Gray RW, Bibens WT, Shellock FG, Magn Reson Imaging 2005 23 8 887 891 10.1016/j.mri.2005.07.005 16275428 (Pubitemid 41579032)
36. Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging? Irnich W, Irnich B, Bartsch C, Stertmann WA, Gufler H, Weiler G, Europace 2005 7 4 353 365 10.1016/j.eupc.2005.02.120 15944094 (Pubitemid 40790421)
37. In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging. Luechinger R, Zeijlemaker VA, Pedersen EM, Mortensen P, Falk E, Duru F, Candinas R, Boesiger P, Eur Heart J 2005 26 4 376 383 discussion 325-377 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi009 15618060 (Pubitemid 40283097)
38. Magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with pacemaker. Maldonado JG, Pereira ME, Albuquerque KR, Pires J, Arq Bras Cardiol 2005 84 5 428 430 15917978 (Pubitemid 40705268)
39. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Roguin A, Donahue JK, Bomma CS, Bluemke DA, Halperin HR, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 4 336 338 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005. 40032.x 15826272 (Pubitemid 40604052)
40. Re.Complete loss of ICD programmability after magnetic resonance imaging. Roguin A, Zviman MM, Halperin HR, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 4 354 author reply 354-355 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.40015-1.x 15826279 (Pubitemid 40604059)
41. Pacemaker complication during magnetic resonance imaging. Rozner MA, Burton AW, Kumar A, J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 45 1 161 162 author reply 162 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.004 15629394 (Pubitemid 40052045)
42. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in patients with cardiac pacemakers. Experimental and clinical investigations at 1.5 Tesla. Schmiedel A, Hackenbroch M, Yang A, Nahle CP, Skowasch D, Meyer C, Schimpf R, Schild H, Sommer T, Rofo 2005 177 5 731 744 10.1055/s-2005-858110 15871088 (Pubitemid 40862530)
43. Clinical study of interference with cardiac pacemakers by a magnetic field at power line frequencies. Trigano A, Blandeau O, Souques M, Gernez JP, Magne I, J Am Coll Cardiol 2005 45 6 896 900 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.072 15766826 (Pubitemid 40342816)
44. Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on a patient with an ICD. Wollmann C, Grude M, Tombach B, Kugel H, Heindel W, Breithardt G, Bocker D, Vahlhaus C, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 4 339 342 10.1111/j.1540-8159. 2005.09535.x 15826273 (Pubitemid 40604053)
45. MRI induced heating of pacemaker leads: effect of temperature probe positioning and pacemaker placement on lead tip heating and local SAR. Mattei E, Calcagnini G, Triventi M, Censi F, Bartolini P, Kainz W, Bassen H, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006 1 1889 1892 17946486 (Pubitemid 46520259)
46. Strategy for safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Naehle CP, Sommer T, Meyer C, Strach K, Kreuz J, Litt H, Lewalter T, Schild H, Schwab JO, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006 29 1 113 116 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00285.x 16441728
47. Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla. Nazarian S, Roguin A, Zviman MM, Lardo AC, Dickfeld TL, Calkins H, Weiss RG, Berger RD, Bluemke DA, Halperin HR, Circulation 2006 114 12 1277 1284 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.607655 16966586 (Pubitemid 44402053)
48. Suppression of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy during magnetic resonance imaging. Nemec J, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006 17 4 444 445 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00351.x 16643373
49. Cardiac pacemaker: in vitro assessment at 1.5 T. Shellock FG, Fieno DS, Thomson LJ, Talavage TM, Berman DS, Am Heart J 2006 151 2 436 443 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.015 16442911 (Pubitemid 43144747)
50. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations. Sommer T, Naehle CP, Yang A, Zeijlemaker V, Hackenbroch M, Schmiedel A, Meyer C, Strach K, Skowasch D, Vahlhaus C, Litt H, Schild H, Circulation 2006 114 12 1285 1292 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.597013 16966587 (Pubitemid 44402054)
51. In vitro investigation of eddy current effect on pacemaker operation generated by low frequency magnetic field. Babouri A, Hedjeidj A, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007 2007 5684 5687 18003302
52. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 0.5T in five patients with permanent pacemakers. Heatlie G, Pennell DJ, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007 9 1 15 19 10.1080/10976640600897260 17178676 (Pubitemid 46018479)
53. Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: in vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation at 1.5-tesla. Shellock FG, Fischer L, Fieno DS, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007 9 1 21 31 10.1080/10976640600897237 17178677 (Pubitemid 46018480)
54. In vitro investigation of pacemaker lead heating induced by magnetic resonance imaging: role of implant geometry. Calcagnini G, Triventi M, Censi F, Mattei E, Bartolini P, Kainz W, Bassen HI, J Magn Reson Imaging 2008 28 4 879 886 10.1002/jmri.21536 18821629
55. Complexity of MRI induced heating on metallic leads: experimental measurements of 374 configurations. Mattei E, Triventi M, Calcagnini G, Censi F, Kainz W, Mendoza G, Bassen HI, Bartolini P, Biomed Eng Online 2008 7 11 10.1186/1475-925X-7-11 18315869 (Pubitemid 351552588)
56. Cardiac biomarkers in patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators undergoing an MRI scan. Mollerus M, Albin G, Lipinski M, Lucca J, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008 31 10 1241 1245 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01172.x 18811802
57. Safety of brain 3-T MR imaging with transmit-receive head coil in patients with cardiac pacemakers: pilot prospective study with 51 examinations. Naehle CP, Meyer C, Thomas D, Remerie S, Krautmacher C, Litt H, Luechinger R, Fimmers R, Schild H, Sommer T, Radiology 2008 249 3 991 1001 10.1148/radiol.2493072195 19011193
58. Determinants of gradient field-induced current in a pacemaker lead system in a magnetic resonance imaging environment. Tandri H, Zviman MM, Wedan SR, Lloyd T, Berger RD, Halperin H, Heart Rhythm 2008 5 3 462 468 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.12.022 18313607
59. Unexpected asystole during 3T magnetic resonance imaging of a pacemaker-dependent patient with a 'modern' pacemaker. Gimbel JR, Europace 2009 11 9 1241 1242 10.1093/europace/eup162 19556252
60. Successful cervical MR scan in a patient several hours after pacemaker implantation. Goldsher D, Jahshan S, Roguin A, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009 32 10 1355 1356 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02497.x 19732369
61. Ectopy in patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators undergoing an MRI scan. Mollerus M, Albin G, Lipinski M, Lucca J, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009 32 6 772 778 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02364.x 19545340
62. Evaluation of cumulative effects of MR imaging on pacemaker systems at 1.5 Tesla. Naehle CP, Zeijlemaker V, Thomas D, Meyer C, Strach K, Fimmers R, Schild H, Sommer T, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009 32 12 1526 1535 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02570.x 19793358
63. Measuring RF-induced currents inside implants: Impact of device configuration on MRI safety of cardiac pacemaker leads. Nordbeck P, Weiss I, Ehses P, Ritter O, Warmuth M, Fidler F, Herold V, Jakob PM, Ladd ME, Quick HH, Bauer WR, Magn Reson Med 2009 61 3 570 578 10.1002/mrm.21881 19132759
64. Safety and imaging quality of MRI in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease patients with pacemakers. Pulver AF, Puchalski MD, Bradley DJ, Minich LL, Su JT, Saarel EV, Whitaker P, Etheridge SP, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009 32 4 450 456 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02304.x 19335853
65. Excessive temperature increases in pacemaker leads at 3-T MR imaging with a transmit-receive head coil. Shellock FG, Radiology 2009 251 3 948 949 author reply 949-950 10.1148/radiol.2513090034 19474383
66. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Patient with a Dual Chamber Pacemaker. Millar LM, Robinson AG, O'Flaherty MT, Eames N, Johnston N, Heyburn G, Case Report Med 2010 2010 292071 21331383
67. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging: increased safety for pacemaker patients? Strach K, Naehle CP, Muhlsteffen A, Hinz M, Bernstein A, Thomas D, Linhart M, Meyer C, Bitaraf S, Schild H, Sommer T, Europace 2010 12 7 952 960 10.1093/europace/euq081 20356915
68. Pacemaker lead tip heating in abandoned and pacemaker-attached leads at 1.5 tesla MRI. Langman DA, Goldberg IB, Finn JP, Ennis DB, J Magn Reson Imaging 2011 33 2 426 431 10.1002/jmri.22463 21274985
69. MRI of patients with cardiac pacemakers: a review of the medical literature. Zikria JF, Machnicki S, Rhim E, Bhatti T, Graham RE, AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011 196 2 390 401 10.2214/AJR.10.4239 21257892
70. Determining the risks of MRI at 1.5-Tesla for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioberter defibrillators (The MagnaSafe Registry). Cohen JD, Costa HS, Russo RJ, Circulation 2010 122 21241
71. The MagnaSafe Registry: Determining the Risks of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Presence of Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs). http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00907361)
72. Government viewpoint: U.S. Food & Drug Administration: Pacemakers, ICDs and MRI. Faris OP, Shein MJ, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 4 268 269 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.50035.x 15826256 (Pubitemid 40604037)
73. Industry viewpoint: Guidant: Pacemakers, ICDs, and MRI. Smith JM, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 4 264 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09591.x 15826253 (Pubitemid 40604034)
74. Industry viewpoint: Medtronic: Pacemakers, ICDs, and MRI. Stanton MS, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 4 265 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.50025.x 15826254 (Pubitemid 40604035)
75. Industry viewpoint: St. Jude Medical: Pacemakers, ICDs and MRI. Levine PA, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 4 266 267 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.50027. x 15826255 (Pubitemid 40604036)
76. MRI: safety in patients with pacemakers or defibrillators: is it prime time yet? Fisher JD, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005 28 4 263 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.50042.x 15826252 (Pubitemid 40604033)
77. Can cardiac pacemakers and magnetic resonance imaging systems co-exist? Martin ET, Eur Heart J 2005 26 4 325 327 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi084 15657068 (Pubitemid 40283090)
78. Food and Drug Administration perspective: Magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Faris OP, Shein M, Circulation 2006 114 12 1232 1233 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.647800 16982951 (Pubitemid 44402047)
79. Pacemaker and ICD malfunction - an incomplete picture. Wilkoff BL, JAMA 2006 295 16 1944 1946 10.1001/jama.295.16.1944 16639055
80. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of patients with a new Medtronic EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system: clinical study design. Sutton R, Kanal E, Wilkoff BL, Bello D, Luechinger R, Jenniskens I, Hull M, Sommer T, Trials 2008 9 68 19055703
81. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment. Wilkoff BL, Bello D, Taborsky M, Vymazal J, Kanal E, Heuer H, Hecking K, Johnson WB, Young W, Ramza B, Akhtar N, Kuepper B, Hunold P, Luechinger R, Puererfellner H, Duru F, Gotte MJ, Sutton R, Sommer T, Heart Rhythm 2011 8 1 65 73 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.002 20933098
82. Safety and efficacy of a new magnetic resonance imaging-compatible pacing system: early results of a prospective comparison with conventional dual-chamber implant outcomes. Forleo GB, Santini L, Della Rocca DG, Romano V, Papavasileiou LP, Magliano G, Sgueglia M, Romeo F, Heart Rhythm 2010 7 6 750 754 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.02.020 20167289
83. Advisa MRI Clinical Study. http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01110915)
84. Clinical Evaluation of the Sorin Group's REPLY MR-conditional Pacing System. http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01341522)
85. Standard Practice for Marking Medical Devices and Other Items for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance Environment. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International 2003 F2503-05(West Conshohocken, PA).
86. St. Jude User's Manual: Tendril MRI, Accent MRI, Accent ST MRI, SJM MRI Activator http://www.sjm.com
87. Biotronik User's Manual: ProMRI http://:www.biotronik.com
88. Cardiac pacemakers, ICDs, and loop recorder: evaluation of translational attraction using conventional ("long-bore") and "short-bore" 1.5- and 3.0-Tesla MR systems. Shellock FG, Tkach JA, Ruggieri PM, Masaryk TJ, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003 5 2 387 397 10.1081/JCMR-120019424 12765117 (Pubitemid 36569957)
89. Evaluation of the rotator cuff and glenoid labrum using a 0.2-Tesla extremity magnetic resonance (MR) system: MR results compared to surgical findings. Shellock FG, Bert JM, Fritts HM, Gundry CR, Easton R, Crues JV, J Magn Reson Imaging 2001 14 6 763 770 10.1002/jmri.10014 11747034 (Pubitemid 33101536)
90. Assessment of the rotator cuff and glenoid labrum using an extremity MR system: MR results compared to surgical findings from a multi-center study. Zlatkin MB, Hoffman C, Shellock FG, J Magn Reson Imaging 2004 19 5 623 631 10.1002/jmri.20040 15112313 (Pubitemid 38619926)
91. Normal and abnormal function of the pacemaker magnetic reed switch. Driller J, Barold SS, Parsonnet V, J Electrocardiol 1976 9 3 283 292 10.1016/S0022-0736(76)80058-1 781163
92. Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: in vitro MRI evaluation at 1.5-Tesla. Shellock FG, Fischer L, Fieno D, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007 9 1 21 31 10.1080/10976640600897237 17178677 (Pubitemid 46018480)
93. Unexpected pacing inhibition upon exposure to the 3T static magnetic field prior to imaging acquisition: What is the mechanism? Gimbel JR, Heart Rhythm 2011 8 6 944 945 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.048 21199688
94. Calculation of MRI-induced heating of an implanted medical lead wire with an electric field transfer function. Park SM, Kamondetdacha R, Nyenhuis JA, J Magn Reson Imaging 2007 26 5 1278 1285 10.1002/jmri.21159 17969143 (Pubitemid 350058295)
95. Minimizing RF heating of conducting wires in MRI. Yeung CJ, Karmarkar P, McVeigh ER, Magn Reson Med 2007 58 5 1028 1034 10.1002/mrm.21410 17969097 (Pubitemid 350074371)
96. Spatial distribution of RF-induced E-fields and implant heating in MRI. Nordbeck P, Fidler F, Weiss I, Warmuth M, Friedrich MT, Ehses P, Geistert W, Ritter O, Jakob PM, Ladd ME, Quick HH, Bauer WR, Magn Reson Med 2008 60 2 312 319 10.1002/mrm.21475 18666101
97. Impact of imaging landmark on the risk of MRI-related heating near implanted medical devices like cardiac pacemaker leads. Nordbeck P, Ritter O, Weiss I, Warmuth M, Gensler D, Burkard N, Herold V, Jakob PM, Ertl G, Ladd ME, Quick HH, Bauer WR, Magn Reson Med 2011 65 1 44 50 20806352
98. Rapid ventricular pacing in a pacemaker patient undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Fontaine JM, Mohamed FB, Gottlieb C, Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998 21 6 1336 1339 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998. tb00202.x 9633085 (Pubitemid 28270075)
99. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Diem B, Bieberle T, Schibgilla V, Bachmann K, Am Heart J 1997 134 3 467 473 10.1016/S0002-8703(97)70083-8 9327704 (Pubitemid 27431252)
100. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacing devices. Buendia F, Sanchez-Gomez JM, Sancho-Tello MJ, Olague J, Osca J, Cano O, Arnau MA, Igual B, Rev Esp Cardiol 2010 63 6 735 739 20515632
101. RF heating due to conductive wires during MRI depends on the phase distribution of the transmit field. Yeung CJ, Susil RC, Atalar E, Magn Reson Med 2002 48 6 1096 1098 10.1002/mrm.10310 12465125 (Pubitemid 35398545)
102. United States Of America Department Of Health And Human Services Food And Drug Administration Center For Devices And Radiological Health Medical Devices Advisory Committee Circulatory System Devices Panel. 2010 http://www.fda.gov/ downloads/AdvisoryCommittesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee
103. Numerical model for estimating RF-induced heating on a pacemaker implant during MRI: experimental validation. Mattei E, Calcagnini G, Censi F, Triventi M, Bartolini P, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2010 57 8 2045 2052 20176532
104. Designing passive MRI-safe implantable conducting leads with electrodes. Bottomley PA, Kumar A, Edelstein WA, Allen JM, Karmarkar PV, Med Phys 2010 37 7 3828 3843 10.1118/1.3439590 20831091
105. Safety of MR imaging in patients who have retained metallic materials after cardiac surgery. Hartnell GG, Spence L, Hughes LA, Cohen MC, Saouaf R, Buff B, AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997 168 5 1157 1159 9129404 (Pubitemid 27183785)
106. Safety of MR imaging in patients with retained epicardial pacer wires. Kanal E, AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998 170 1 213 214 9423633
107. The R-on-T phenomenon in patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators. Fries R, Steuer M, Schafers HJ, Bohm M, Am J Cardiol 2003 91 6 752 755 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)03424-0 12633818 (Pubitemid 36287478)
108. Significance of R-on-T phenomenon in early ventricular tachyarrhythmia susceptibility after acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. Chiladakis JA, Karapanos G, Davlouros P, Aggelopoulos G, Alexopoulos D, Manolis AS, Am J Cardiol 2000 85 3 289 293 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00734-1 11078294 (Pubitemid 30052898)
109. ECG artifacts during intraoperative high-field MRI scanning. Birkholz T, Schmid M, Nimsky C, Schuttler J, Schmitz B, J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2004 16 4 271 276 10.1097/00008506-200410000-00002 15557829 (Pubitemid 39336692)
110. Noise cancellation signal processing method and computer system for improved real-time electrocardiogram artifact correction during MRI data acquisition. Odille F, Pasquier C, Abacherli R, Vuissoz PA, Zientara GP, Felblinger J, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007 54 4 630 640 17405370 (Pubitemid 46469938)
111. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Borgstede JP, Bradley WG Jr, Froelich JW, Gilk T, Gimbel JR, Gosbee J, Kuhni-Kaminski E, Lester JW Jr, Nyenhuis J, Parag Y, Schaefer DJ, Sebek-Scoumis EA, Weinreb J, Zaremba LA, Wilcox P, Lucey L, Sass N, AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007 188 6 1447 1474 10.2214/AJR.06.1616 17515363 (Pubitemid 46866845)
112. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Levine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE, Bluemke DA, Flamm SD, Kanal E, Manning WJ, Martin ET, Smith JM, Wilke N, Shellock FS, Circulation 2007 116 24 2878 2891 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187256 18025533 (Pubitemid 350291228)
113. Pacemaker and ICD lead extraction with electrosurgical dissection sheaths and standard transvenous extraction systems: results of a randomized trial. Neuzil P, Taborsky M, Rezek Z, Vopalka R, Sediva L, Niederle P, Reddy V, Europace 2007 9 2 98 104 10.1093/europace/eul171 17272329 (Pubitemid 46237972)
114. Clinical experience with a new cardioverter defibrillator capable of biphasic waveform pulse and enhanced data storage: results of a prospective multicenter study. European Ventak P2 Investigator Group. Neuzner J, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994 17 7 1243 1255 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01491.x 7937230 (Pubitemid 24230899)
115. Clinical evaluation of defibrillation efficacy with a new single-capacitor biphasic waveform in patients undergoing implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Brugada J, Herse B, Sandsted B, Michel U, Schubert BD, Hahn SJ, Europace 2001 3 4 278 284 10.1053/eupc.2001.0184 11678385 (Pubitemid 32976403)
116. A randomized prospective study of single coil versus dual coil defibrillation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias undergoing implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Rinaldi CA, Simon RD, Geelen P, Reek S, Baszko A, Kuehl M, Gill JS, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003 26 8 1684 1690 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.t01-1-00253.x 12877701 (Pubitemid 36936743)
117. A protocol for patients with cardiovascular implantable devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): should defibrillation threshold testing be performed post-(MRI). Burke PT, Ghanbari H, Alexander PB, Shaw MK, Daccarett M, Machado C, J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2010 28 1 59 66 10.1007/s10840-009-9463-y 20111895
118. Shellock FG, Reference Manual for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Implants, and Devices Los Angeles: Biomedical Research Publishing Group 2011 2011
119. Neurostimulation systems for deep brain stimulation: in vitro evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-related heating at 1.5 tesla. Rezai AR, Finelli D, Nyenhuis JA, Hrdlicka G, Tkach J, Sharan A, Rugieri P, Stypulkowski PH, Shellock FG, J Magn Reson Imaging 2002 15 3 241 250 10.1002/jmri.10069 11891968 (Pubitemid 34195119)
120. MR imaging-related heating of deep brain stimulation electrodes: in vitro study. Finelli DA, Rezai AR, Ruggieri PM, Tkach JA, Nyenhuis JA, Hrdlicka G, Sharan A, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Stypulkowski PH, Shellock FG, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002 23 10 1795 1802 12427641 (Pubitemid 35304121)
121. MR safety in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation systems (DBS). Sharan A, Rezai AR, Nyenhuis JA, Hrdlicka G, Tkach J, Baker K, Turbay M, Rugieri P, Phillips M, Shellock FG, Acta Neurochir Suppl 2003 87 141 145 14518542
122. Neurostimulation system used for deep brain stimulation (DBS): MR safety issues and implications of failing to follow safety recommendations. Rezai AR, Phillips M, Baker KB, Sharan AD, Nyenhuis J, Tkach J, Henderson J, Shellock FG, Invest Radiol 2004 39 5 300 303 10.1097/01.rli.0000124940.02340.ab 15087724 (Pubitemid 38520664)
123. Bilateral neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation: in vitro study of MRI-related heating at 1.5 T and implications for clinical imaging of the brain. Bhidayasiri R, Bronstein JM, Sinha S, Krahl SE, Ahn S, Behnke EJ, Cohen MS, Frysinger R, Shellock FG, Magn Reson Imaging 2005 23 4 549 555 10.1016/j.mri.2005.02.007 15919600 (Pubitemid 40779241)
124. Permanent neurological deficit related to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes for Parkinson's disease: case report. Henderson JM, Tkach J, Phillips M, Baker K, Shellock FG, Rezai AR, Neurosurgery 2005 57 5 1063 discussion E1063 10.1227/01.NEU. 0000180810.16964.3E 16284543 (Pubitemid 41579747)
125. Is magnetic resonance imaging safe for patients with neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation? Rezai AR, Baker KB, Tkach JA, Phillips M, Hrdlicka G, Sharan AD, Nyenhuis J, Ruggieri P, Shellock FG, Henderson J, Neurosurgery 2005 57 5 1056 1062 discussion 1056-1062 10.1227/01.NEU.0000186935. 87971.2a 16284576 (Pubitemid 41579745)
126. Use of real-time magnetic resonance guidance to assist bone biopsy in pediatric malignancy. Ueno S, Yokoyama S, Hirakawa H, Yabe H, Suzuki Y, Atsumi H, Matsumae M, Pediatrics 2002 109 1 18 10.1542/peds.109.1.e18 11773586
127. Real-time magnetic resonance-guided placement of retrievable inferior vena cava filters: comparison with fluoroscopic guidance with use of in vitro and animal models. Shih MC, Rogers WJ, Hagspiel KD, J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006 17 2 Pt 1 327 333 16517779 (Pubitemid 44341452)
128. Transperineal prostate biopsy under magnetic resonance image guidance: a needle placement accuracy study. Blumenfeld P, Hata N, DiMaio S, Zou K, Haker S, Fichtinger G, Tempany CM, J Magn Reson Imaging 2007 26 3 688 694 10.1002/jmri.21067 17729363 (Pubitemid 350194593)
129. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging guidance for cardiovascular procedures. Horvath KA, Li M, Mazilu D, Guttman MA, McVeigh ER, Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007 19 4 330 335 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2007.10.006 18395633 (Pubitemid 351461264)
130. Feasibility of real-time magnetic resonance imaging for catheter guidance in electrophysiology studies. Nazarian S, Kolandaivelu A, Zviman MM, Meininger GR, Kato R, Susil RC, Roguin A, Dickfeld TL, Ashikaga H, Calkins H, Berger RD, Bluemke DA, Lardo AC, Halperin HR, Circulation 2008 118 3 223 229 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742452 18574048
131. Midterm results of transapical aortic valve replacement via real-time magnetic resonance imaging guidance. Horvath KA, Mazilu D, Guttman M, Zetts A, Hunt T, Li M, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010 139 2 424 430 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009. 08.005 19969312
132. Percutaneous cryoablation of small kidney tumours under magnetic resonance imaging guidance: medium-term follow-up. Caviezel A, Terraz S, Schmidlin F, Becker C, Iselin CE, Scand J Urol Nephrol 2008 42 5 412 416 10.1080/00365590801951632 18609277
133. Magnetic resonance guidance for radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors. Clasen S, Pereira PL, J Magn Reson Imaging 2008 27 2 421 433 10.1002/jmri.21264 18219677 (Pubitemid 351214048)
134. A clinical review of focused ultrasound ablation with magnetic resonance guidance: an option for treating uterine fibroids. Hesley GK, Gorny KR, Henrichsen TL, Woodrum DA, Brown DL, Ultrasound Q 2008 24 2 131 139 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31817c5e0c 18528271
135. Impact of intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging guidance on glioma surgery: a prospective volumetric analysis. Hatiboglu MA, Weinberg JS, Suki D, Rao G, Prabhu SS, Shah K, Jackson E, Sawaya R, Neurosurgery 2009 64 6 1073 1081 discussion 1081 10.1227/01.NEU.0000345647.58219.07 19487886
136. Percutaneous injection of chemotherapeutic drugs in the guidance of magnetic resonance imaging for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Liu ZH, Zhang P, Zhou YK, Qin HL, Med Sci Monit 2010 16 12 Y31 33 21119586
137. Interventional magnetic resonance guidance of deep brain stimulator implantation for Parkinson disease. Martin AJ, Larson PS, Ostrem JL, Starr PA, Top Magn Reson Imaging 2009 19 4 213 221 19148038
138. Magnetic catheter navigation system interference with a dual-chamber pacemaker. Kolb C, Luik A, Hessling G, Zrenner B, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007 18 8 892 893 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00824.x 17488267 (Pubitemid 47093064)
139. Rapid right ventricular pacing with MR-compatible pacemaker lead for MR-guided aortic balloon valvuloplasty in swine. Neizel M, Kramer N, Bonner F, Schutte A, Kruger S, Kelm M, Gunther RW, Kuhl HP, Krombach GA, Radiology 2010 255 3 799 804 10.1148/radiol.10091419 20501717
140. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Sarcoidosis with MR Conditional Pacemaker in Situ. Quarta G, Holdright DR, Plant GT, Harkness A, Hausenloy D, Hyare H, Moon JC, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011 13 1 26 10.1186/1532-429X-13-26 21539747
141. First MRI-safe pacemaker receives conditional approval from FDA. Mitka M, JAMA 2011 305 10 985 986 10.1001/jama.2011.273 21386073
142. The 11th World Survey of Cardiac Pacing and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Calendar Year 2009-A World Society of Arrhythmia's Project. Mond HG, Proclemer A, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011 34 8 1013 1027 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03150.x 21707667
143. MRI in patients with cardiac pacemakers: in vitro and in vivo evaluation at 0.5 tesla. Sommer T, Lauck G, Schimpf R, von Smekal A, Wolke S, Block W, Gieseke J, Schneider C, Funke HD, Schild H, Rofo 1998 168 1 36 43 10.1055/s-2007-1015179 9501932 (Pubitemid 28097745)
144. Dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging without complications in a patient with dual-chamber demand pacemaker. Sardanelli F, Lupo P, Esseridou A, Fausto A, Quarenghi M, Acta Radiol 2006 47 1 24 27 10.1080/02841850500409542 16498929 (Pubitemid 43177526)
145. Accent MRI Pacemaker and Tendril MRI Lead New Technology Assesment. http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01258218)