Determinants of gradient field-induced current in a pacemaker lead system in a magnetic resonance imaging environment

Heart Rhythm

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 462-468

  Tandri, Harikrishna ^a   Zviman, Menekhem M ^a   Wedan, Steven R ^b   Lloyd, Thomas ^c   Berger, Ronald D ^a   Halperin, Henry ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Imricor Medical Systems   (United States)

^c Boston Scientific   (United States)

Author keywords

Determinants; Induced current; Interaction; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pacemaker

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART MUSCLE CONDUCTION SYSTEM; HEART MUSCLE POTENTIAL; HEART PACING; HEART RATE; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAGNETIC FIELD; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE GENERATOR;

ANIMALS; DOGS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 39649111737     PISSN: 15475271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.12.022     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Shellock F.G., and Crues J.V. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 232 (2004) 635-652
2. Prasad S.K., and Pennell D.J. Safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with cardiovascular implants and devices. Heart 90 (2004) 1241-1244
3. Faris O.P., and Shein M.J. Government viewpoint: U.S. Food and Drug Administration: pacemakers, ICDs and MRI. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28 (2005) 268-269
4. Roguin A., Donahue J.K., Bomma C.S., et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28 (2005) 336-338
5. Roguin A., Zviman M.M., Meininger G.R., et al. Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: in vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T. Circulation 110 (2004) 475-482
6. Nazarian S., Roguin A., Zviman M.M., et al. Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla. Circulation 114 (2006) 1277-1284
7. Sommer T., Naehle C.P., Yang A., et al. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations. Circulation 114 (2006) 1285-1292
8. Fontaine J.M., Mohamed F.B., Gottlieb C., et al. Rapid ventricular pacing in a pacemaker patient undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21 (1998) 1336-1339
9. Finelli D.A., Rezai A.R., Ruggieri P.M., et al. MRI-related heating of deep brain stimulation electrodes: in vitro study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23 (2002) 1795-1802
10. Shellock F.G. Thermal responses in human subjects exposed to MRI. Ann N Y Acad Sci 649 (1992) 260-272
11. Shellock F.G. Metallic neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 14 (2001) 295-299
12. Luechinger R., Duru F., Scheidegger M.B., et al. Force and torque effects of a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner on cardiac pacemakers and ICDs. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 24 (2001) 199-205