Real-time magnetic resonance-guided placement of retrievable inferior vena cava filters: Comparison with fluoroscopic guidance with use of in vitro and animal models

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 327-333

  Shih, Ming Chen Paul ^a   Rogers, Walter J ^a   Hagspiel, Klaus D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FLUOROSCOPY; IMAGING; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SWINE; TECHNIQUE; VENA CAVA FILTER; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; DISEASE MODEL; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHLEBOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; DEVICE REMOVAL; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; FLUOROSCOPY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PHLEBOGRAPHY; SWINE; VENA CAVA FILTERS;

EID: 33746905547     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000196339.41703.6C     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bartels LW, Bakker CJG, Viergever MA. Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RF artifacts. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47:171-180.
2. Frahm C, Gehl HB, Lorch H, et al. MR-guided placement of a temporary vena cava filter: technique and feasibility. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8:105-109.
3. Kinney TB. Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:425-440.
4. Adam G, Bucker A, Nolte-Ernsting C, et al. Interventional MR imaging: percutaneous abdominal and skeletal biopsies and drainages of the abdomen. Eur Radiol 1999; 9:1471-1478.
5. Prince MR, Arnoldus C, Frisoli JK. Nephrotoxicity of high-dose gadolinium compared with iodinated contrast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 1:162-166.
6. Bucker A, Neuerburg JM, Adam GB, et al. Real-time MR guidance for inferior vena cava filter placement in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:753-756.
7. Hagspiel KD, Kandarpa K, Jolesz F. Interventional MR imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997; 8:745-758.
8. Araki T, Aoki S, Ishigame K, et al. MR-guided intravascular catheter manipulation: feasibility of both active and passive tracking in experimental study and initial clinical applications. Radiat Med 2002; 20:1-8.
9. Ladd ME, Debatin JF. Interventional and intravascular MR angiography. Herz 2000; 25:440-451.
10. Hagspiel KD, Kandarpa K, Silverman SG. Interactive MR-guided percutaneous nephrostomy. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8:1319-1322.
11. Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Darrow RD. Real-time position monitoring of invasive devices using magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29:411-415.
12. Melzer A, Busch MH, Bertsch T, et al. Active MRI catheters with integrated resonating circuit and RF antenna without lead connection to the MR system. Radiology 2000; 217:913-.
13. Gamblin TC, Ashley DW, Burch S, Solis M. A prospective evaluation of a bedside technique for placement of inferior vena cava filters: accuracy and limitations of intravascular ultrasound. Am Surg 2003; 69:382-386.