Transperineal prostate biopsy under magnetic resonance image guidance: A needle placement accuracy study

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 688-694

  Blumenfeld, Philip ^a   Hata, Nobuhiko ^a   DiMaio, Simon ^a   Zou, Kelly ^a   Haker, Steven ^a   Fichtinger, Gabor ^b   Tempany, Clare M C ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy assessment; Biopsy; Intraoperative MRI; Needle misplacement; Prostate

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; HUMAN; MALE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERINEUM; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; AGED; ARTIFACT; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

AGED; ARTIFACTS; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 35248858919     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21067     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Weir HK, Thun MJ, Hankey BF, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95:1276-1299.
2. Beyersdorff D, Winkel A, Hamm B, Lenk S, Loening SA, Taupitz M. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. Radiology 2005;234:576-581.
3. Terris MK. Sensitivity and specificity of sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: preliminary report. Urology 1999;54: 486-489.
4. Mettlin C, Lee F, Drago J, Murphy GP. The American-Cancer-Society National Prostate-Cancer detection project - findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men. Cancer 1991;67: 2949-2958.
5. Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparen P, Norlen BJ, Busch C. The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 1997;50: 562-566.
6. D'Amico AV, Tempany CM, Cormack R, et al. Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2000;164: 385-387.
7. Zangos S, Eichler K, Engelmann K, et al. MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2005;15:174-182.
8. Hata N, Jinzaki M, Kacher D, et al. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. Radiology 2001;220:263-268.
9. Adusumilli S, Pretorius ES. Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 2002;20:192-210.
10. Wefer AE, Hricak H, Vigneron DB, et al. Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. J Urol 2000;164:400-404.
11. So MJ, Haker S, Zou KH, et al. Clinical evaluation of MR-guided prostate biopsy. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Miami Beach, FL, USA, 2005 (Abstract 264).
12. Shen D, Lao Z, Zeng J, et al. Optimized prostate biopsy via a statistical atlas of cancer spatial distribution. Med Image Anal 2004;8:139-150.
13. Susil RC, Camphausen K, Choyke P, et al. System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5 T MRI scanner. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:683-687.
14. Schneider E, Rohling KW, Schnall MD, Giaquinto RO, Morris EA, Ballon D. An apparatus for MR-guided breast lesion localization and core biopsy: design and preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:243-253.
15. DiMaio SP, Salcudean SE. Interactive simulation of needle insertion models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005;52:1167-1179.
16. DiMaio SP, Salcudean SE. Needle steering and motion planning in soft tissues. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005;52:965-974.
17. Horn BKP, Hilden HM, Negahdaripour S. Closed form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices. J Optical Soc A 1988;4:51127-51135.
18. Fitzpatrick JM, West JB, Maurer CR Jr. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17: 694-702.
19. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815-850.
20. Nakashima J, Tanimoto A, Imai Y, et al. Endorectal MRI for prediction of tumor site, tumor size, and local extension of prostate cancer. Urology. 2004;64:101-105.
21. Wu X, Dibiase SJ, Gullapalli R, Yu CX. Deformable image registration for the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in prostate treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;58:1577-1583.
22. Okamura AM, Simone C, O'Leary MD. Force modeling for needle insertion into soft tissue. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004;51:1707-1716.
23. Butts K, Pauly JM, Daniel BL, Kee S, Norbash AM. Management of biopsy needle artifacts: techniques for RF-refocused MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:586-595.
24. Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Jain VR, Petersilge CA, Chao CP, Haaga JR. Needle localization in MR-guided biopsy and aspiration: effects of field strength, sequence design, and magnetic field orientation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:1337-1345.
25. Ladd ME, Erhart P, Debatin JF, Romanowski BJ, Boesiger P, McKinnon GC. Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:646-651.
26. Liu H, Martin AJ, Truwit CL. Interventional MRI at high-field (1.5 T): needle artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:214-219.
27. Liu H, Hall WA, Martin AJ, Truwit CL. Biopsy needle tip artifact in MR-guided neurosurgery. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:16-22.
28. Krieger A, Susil RC, Menard C, et al. Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate intervention. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005;52:306-313.