Reading Words and Wirds: Phonology and Lexical Access

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 696-714

  Marmurek, Harvey H C ^a   Kwantes, Peter J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030494425     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755634     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234-254.
2. Balota, D.A., & Chumbley, J.J. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
3. Baluch, B., & Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 644-652.
4. Besner, D., & Smith, M.C. (1992). Models of word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 468-482.
5. Broadbent, D.E., & Broadbent, M.H.P. (1975). Some further data concerning the word frequency effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 297-308.
6. Carr, T.H., & Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T.G. Waller, & G.E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 1-82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
8. Herdman, C.M., LeFevre, J., & Greenham, S.L. (1994). Implicating the lexicon: Base-word frequency effects in pseudohomophone naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 575-590.
9. Kucera, H., & Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
10. Laxon, V., Masterson, J., Pool, M., & Keating, C. (1992). Nonword naming: Further explanation of the pseudohomophone effect in terms of orthographic neighborhood size, graphemic changes, spelling-sound consistency, and reader accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 730-748.
11. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M.T. (1993). Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 166-178.
12. McCann, R.S., & Besner, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 14-24.
13. McRae, K., Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1990). On the roles of frequency and lexical access in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 43-65.
14. Monsell, S., Patterson, K.E., Graham, A., Hughes, C.H., & Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translations of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 452-467.
15. Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
16. Taft, M., & Russell, B. (1992). Pseudohomophone naming and the word frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 51-71.