Phonological Priming in the Lexical Decision Task: Regularity Effects Are Not Necessary Evidence for Assembly

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 1727-1742

  Berent, Iris ^a  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; LINGUISTICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; READING; UNITED STATES;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PENNSYLVANIA; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING;

EID: 0031296621     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.6.1727     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory & Cognition, 10, 565-575.
2. Baron, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 241-246.
3. Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2, 386-393.
4. Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146-184.
5. Berent, I., & Van Orden, G. (1996). Can we unmask the phonemic masking effect? The problem of methodological divergence. In G. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 494-500). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Bernstein, S. E., & Carr, T. H. (1996). Dual-route theories of pronouncing printed words: What can be learned from concurrent task performance? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 86-116.
7. Bower, T. G. (1970). Reading by eye. Phonology and reading. In H. Levin & J. O. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies in reading (pp. 134-146). New York: Basic Books.
8. Carello, C., Turvey, M. T., & Lukatela, G. (1992). Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly nonphonological? In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 211-226). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). London: Academic Press.
10. Coltheart, M., Besner, D., Jonasson, T., & Davelaar, E. (1979). Phonological encoding in the lexical decision task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 489-507.
11. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual route and parallel distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
12. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, T. V., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In D. Stanislav (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 532-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
14. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353-372.
15. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1993). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation in the early phases of visual word recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 119-122.
16. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 365-382.
17. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1996). List context effects on masked phonological priming in the lexical decision task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 515-519.
18. Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
19. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 680-698.
20. Fredriksen, J. F., & Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 361-379.
21. Gibbs, P., & Van Orden, G. C. (in press). Pathway selection's utility for strategic control of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
22. Kawamoto, A. (1993). Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 474-516.
23. Kawamoto, A., & Zemblidge, J. (1992). Pronunciation of homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 349-374.
24. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
25. Lesch, M., & Pollatsek, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 285-294.
26. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology. Memory & Cognition, 18, 128-152.
27. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 166-178.
28. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associate priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
29. Martin, R. C. (1982). The pseudohomophone effect: The role of visual similarity in non-word decisions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 395-409.
30. McCann, R. S., Besner, D., & Davelaar, E. (1988). Word recognition and identification: Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical access? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 693-706.
31. McQuade, D. V. (1981). Variable reliance on phonological information in visual word recognition. Language and Speech, 24, 99-109.
32. McQuade, D. V. (1983). Pre-lexical phonological recoding becomes automatic with stimulus repetitions. Language and Speech, 26, 393-405.
33. Meyer, D. E., & Ruddy, M. G. (1973, November). Lexical-memory retrieval based on graphemic and phonemic representations of printed words. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
34. Monsell, S., Patterson, K., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H., & Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 451-467.
35. Paap, K. R., & Johansen, L. S. (1994). The case of vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1129-1157.
36. Paap, K. R., & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research, 53, 13-24.
37. Paap, K. R., Noel, R. W., & Johansen, L. S. (1992). Dual-route models of print to sound: Red herrings and real horses. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 293-318). Amsterdam: North Holland.
38. Parkin, A. J., & Underwood, G. (1983). Orthographic vs. phonological irregularity in lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 11, 351-355.
39. Perfetti, C. A., & Bell, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 473-485.
40. Perfetti, C. A., Bell, L. C., & Delaney, S. M. (1988). Automatic (pre-lexical) phonetic activation in silent reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 57-68.
41. Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a "universal" phonological principle. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 227-248). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
42. Plaut, D., & McClelland, J. (1993). Generalization with componential attractors: Word and nonword reading in an attractor network. In Proceedings of the 15th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 824-829). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148-162.
44. Pugh, K. R., Rexer, K., & Katz, L. (1994). Evidence of flexible coding in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 807-825.
45. Rosson, M. B. (1985). The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations in reading aloud. Memory & Cognition, 13, 90-99.
46. Rubinstein, H., Lewis, S. S., & Rubinstein, M. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 645-657.
47. Schneider, W. (1990). MEL user's guide: Computer techniques for real time experimentation. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
48. Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1-30.
49. Seidenberg, M., Peterson, A., MacDonald, M., & Plaut, D. (1996). Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 48-62.
50. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
51. Stanovich, K. E., & Bauer, D. W. (1978). Experiments on the spelling-to-sound regularity effect in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 6, 410-415.
52. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
53. Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 744-774.
54. Tuller, B., Case, P., Ding, M., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1994). The nonlinear dynamics of speech categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 3-16.
55. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
56. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
57. Venezky, R. L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
58. Verstaen, A., Humphreys, G., Olson, A., & D'Ydewalle, G. (1995). Are phonemic effects in backward masking evidence for automatic prelexical phonemic activation in visual word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 335-356.
59. Waters, G. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition, 13, 557-572.