Basic processes in reading: A critical review of pseudohomophone effects in reading aloud and a new computational account

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 622-646

  Reynolds, Michael ^a   Besner, Derek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31044447882     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196752     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. BALOTA, D., & CHUMBLEY, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 89-106.
2. BALOTA, D., & CHUMBLEY, J. I. (1990). Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 231-237.
3. BALUCH, B., & BESNER, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 644-652.
4. BESNER, D. (1999). Basic processes in reading: Multiple routines in localist and connectionist models. In R. M. Klein & P. A. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia (pp. 413-458). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. BESNER, D., & SMITH, M. (1992). Basic processes in reading: Is the orthographic depth hypothesis sinking? In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 45-66). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
6. BESNER, D., TWILLEY, L., MCCANN, R. S., & SEERGOBIN, K. (1990). On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary? Psychological Review, 97, 432-446.
7. BOROWSKY, R., & BESNER, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multi-stage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 813-840.
8. BOROWSKY, R., OWEN, W. J., & MASSON, M. E. J. (2002). Diagnostics of phonological lexical processing: Pseudohomophone naming advantages, disadvantages, and base-word frequency effects. Memory & Cognition, 30, 969-987.
9. BOROWSKY, R., PHILLIPS, J., & OWEN, W. (2003, June). Phonetic decoding processes: On the generalization of the dissociation of frequency and lexicality effects in pseudohomophone naming. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain Behaviour and Cognitive Science, Hamilton, ON.
10. BROWN, M., & BESNER, D. (2002). Semantic priming: On the role of awareness in visual word recognition in the absence of an expectancy. Consciousness & Cognition, 11, 402-422.
11. BUB, D., CANCELLIERE, A., & KERTESZ, A. (1985). Whole-word and analytic translation of spelling to sound in a non-semantic reader. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 15-34). London: Erlbaum.
12. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., LANGDON, R., & ZIEGLER, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
13. FORSTER, K. I., & CHAMBERS, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
14. GRAINGER, J., SPINELLI, E., & FERRAND, L. (2000). Effects of base word frequency and orthographic neighborhood size in pseudohomophone naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 88-102.
15. HERDMAN, C. M., LEFEVRE, J.-A., & GREENHAM, S. L. (1994). Implicating the lexicon: Base-word frequency effects in pseudohomophone naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 575-590.
16. HERDMAN, C. M., LEFEVRE, J.-A., & GREENHAM, S. L. (1996). Base-word frequency and pseudohomophone naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49 A, 1044-1061.
17. HOAGLIN, D. C., & WELSCH, R. E. (1978). The hat matrix in regression and ANOVA. American Statistician, 32, 17-22.
18. KINOSHITA, S., & LUPKER, S. J. (2003). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways in naming: A re-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 405-415.
19. LUPKER, S. J., BROWN, P., & COLOMBO, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 570-590.
20. MARMUREK, H. H. C., & KWANTES, P. J. (1996). Reading words and wirds: Phonology and lexical access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 696-714.
21. MCCANN, R. S., & BESNER, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word frequency effects in naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 14-24.
22. MONSELL, S., DOYLE, M. C., & HAGGARD, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43-71.
23. MONSELL, S., PATTERSON, K. E., GRAHAM, A., HUGHES, C. H., & MILROY, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 452-467.
24. MULATTI, C., BESNER, D., & JOB, R. (2003, November). Reading aloud: Evidence for a phonologically based neighborhood density effect. Poster presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver.
25. PATTERSON, K., SUZUKI, T., & WYDELL, T. N. (1996). Interpreting a case of Japanese phonological alexia: The key is in phonology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 803-822.
26. RASTLE, K., & COLTHEART, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 277-282.
27. REYNOLDS, M., & BESNER, D. (2004). Neighbourhood density, word frequency, and spelling-sound regularity effects in naming: Similarities and differences between skilled readers and the dual route cascaded computational model. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 58, 13-31.
28. REYNOLDS, M., & BESNER, D. (2005). Contextual control of lexical and sublexical routines when reading English aloud. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 113-118.
29. REYNOLDS, M., MULATTI, C., & BESNER, D. (2004, June). Spying on your neighbors: Orthographic and phonological effects in naming. Poster presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science, St. Johns, NF.
30. ROBERTS, M. A., RASTLE, K., COLTHEART, M., & BESNER, D. (2003). When parallel processing in visual word recognition is not enough: New evidence from naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 405-414.
31. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
32. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1990). More words but still no lexicon: Reply to Besner et al. (1990). Psychological Review, 97, 447-452.
33. SEIDENBERG, M. S., PETERSEN, A., MACDONALD, M. C., & FLAUT, D. C. (1996). Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. & Cognition, 22, 48-62.
34. SMITH, M. C., & BESNER, D. (2001). Modulating semantic feedback in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 111-117.
35. STOLZ, J. A., & NEELY, J. H. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 596-611.
36. STRAIN, E., PATTERSON, K. E., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1140-1154.
37. TAFT, M., & RUSSELL, B. (1992). Pseudohomophone naming and the word frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 51-71.
38. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICœUR, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47 A, 631-650.
39. WEEKES, B. (1997). Differential effects of letter number of word and nonword naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439-456.
40. ZEVIN, J. D., & BALOTA, D. A. (2000). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 121-135.